Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Phil" == Phil Scordis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Phil However, after re-writing all of the cites into the original Phil document the buffer overflow returned. Inspection of the .aux Phil file indicated a number of figure captions that seemed to be Phil quite lengthy, and sure enough commenting

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Phil" == Phil Scordis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Phil No, those particular ones did not, but reducing their lengths or Phil removing them all together solved it. That may be a bibtex bug, then, but it surprises me a bit. JMarc

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Phil" == Phil Scordis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Phil However, after re-writing all of the cites into the original Phil document the buffer overflow returned. Inspection of the .aux Phil file indicated a number of figure captions that seemed to be Phil quite lengthy, and sure enough commenting

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Phil" == Phil Scordis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Phil No, those particular ones did not, but reducing their lengths or Phil removing them all together solved it. That may be a bibtex bug, then, but it surprises me a bit. JMarc

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Phil" == Phil Scordis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Phil> However, after re-writing all of the cites into the original Phil> document the buffer overflow returned. Inspection of the .aux Phil> file indicated a number of figure captions that seemed to be Phil> quite lengthy, and sure enough

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Phil" == Phil Scordis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Phil> No, those particular ones did not, but reducing their lengths or Phil> removing them all together solved it. That may be a bibtex bug, then, but it surprises me a bit. JMarc

Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Phil Scordis
I am having strange problems inserting a bibtex database into both lyx and klyx (the error message below is from lyx 1.1.5, but I have experienced the same problem in Klyx) This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Herbert Voss
This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's buffer size 5000 Can anyone tell me why this may be happening? Especially as the bib file, when inserted into another document, works perfectly. delete the aux-file and

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Phil Scordis
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Herbert Voss wrote: This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's buffer size 5000 Can anyone tell me why this may be happening? Especially as the bib file, when inserted into another

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Phil" == Phil Scordis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Phil On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Herbert Voss wrote: This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's buffer size 5000 Can anyone tell me why this may be happening?

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Phil Scordis
I think I discovered the REAL source of my lyx/bibtex problem. After experimenting with sections of the document to identify which elements were causing the problem, I thought I had discovered the source of the error. It appeared that a very much shortened document with fewer incorrect cites

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Herbert Voss
Phil Scordis wrote: I think I discovered the REAL source of my lyx/bibtex problem. After experimenting with sections of the document to identify which elements were causing the problem, I thought I had discovered the source of the error. It appeared that a very much shortened document

Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Phil Scordis
I am having strange problems inserting a bibtex database into both lyx and klyx (the error message below is from lyx 1.1.5, but I have experienced the same problem in Klyx) This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Herbert Voss
This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's buffer size 5000 Can anyone tell me why this may be happening? Especially as the bib file, when inserted into another document, works perfectly. delete the aux-file and

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Phil Scordis
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Herbert Voss wrote: This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's buffer size 5000 Can anyone tell me why this may be happening? Especially as the bib file, when inserted into another

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Phil" == Phil Scordis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Phil On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Herbert Voss wrote: This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's buffer size 5000 Can anyone tell me why this may be happening?

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Phil Scordis
I think I discovered the REAL source of my lyx/bibtex problem. After experimenting with sections of the document to identify which elements were causing the problem, I thought I had discovered the source of the error. It appeared that a very much shortened document with fewer incorrect cites

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Herbert Voss
Phil Scordis wrote: I think I discovered the REAL source of my lyx/bibtex problem. After experimenting with sections of the document to identify which elements were causing the problem, I thought I had discovered the source of the error. It appeared that a very much shortened document

Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Phil Scordis
I am having strange problems inserting a bibtex database into both lyx and klyx (the error message below is from lyx 1.1.5, but I have experienced the same problem in Klyx) This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Herbert Voss
> This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) > The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux > Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's buffer size 5000 > > Can anyone tell me why this may be happening? > Especially as the bib file, when inserted into another document, works > perfectly. delete the

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Phil Scordis
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Herbert Voss wrote: > > This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) > > The top-level auxiliary file: thesis.aux > > Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's buffer size 5000 > > > > Can anyone tell me why this may be happening? > > Especially as the bib file, when inserted into

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Phil" == Phil Scordis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Phil> On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Herbert Voss wrote: >> > This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.3.1) > The top-level >> auxiliary file: thesis.aux > Sorry---you've exceeded BibTeX's >> buffer size 5000 > > Can anyone tell me why this may be

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Phil Scordis
I think I discovered the REAL source of my lyx/bibtex problem. After experimenting with sections of the document to identify which elements were causing the problem, I thought I had discovered the source of the error. It appeared that a very much shortened document with fewer incorrect cites

Re: Bibtex in Lyx and/or Klyx

2000-06-23 Thread Herbert Voss
Phil Scordis wrote: > > I think I discovered the REAL source of my lyx/bibtex problem. > > After experimenting with sections of the document to identify which > elements were causing the problem, I thought I had discovered the source > of the error. It appeared that a very much shortened