RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
De Are you sure that you didn't have this problem with fix1 ? De I don't see how can this happen. De De Maybe you updated latex and this caused the problem ? St I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem St exists on my system, too. St St I searched the archive about this problem: St St Is it possible that it's caused by some optimizing compiling St options of gcc as mentioned earlier? St St If it's so, how can the source made robust to be protected St about this optimizations? Is it possible, that Claus Hentschel has fixed this problem for the windows release? I have found this on http://www.fh-hannover.de/mbau/tim/hentschel/lyx/index.htm 2001-06-25 New release LyX 1.1.6fix2b with small changes compared to LyX 1.1.6fix2a: * Fixed problem with missing index using MikTeX. * Fixed problem with pdf-update after any change in the lyx file. The last one sounds very interesting! Can this be aplied to the linux versions? Marcus By the way: IMHO www.lyx.org looks *much* better now, and is *much* better readable :-) Nice job!!
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
De Are you sure that you didn't have this problem with fix1 ? De I don't see how can this happen. De De Maybe you updated latex and this caused the problem ? St I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem St exists on my system, too. St St I searched the archive about this problem: St St Is it possible that it's caused by some optimizing compiling St options of gcc as mentioned earlier? St St If it's so, how can the source made robust to be protected St about this optimizations? Is it possible, that Claus Hentschel has fixed this problem for the windows release? I have found this on http://www.fh-hannover.de/mbau/tim/hentschel/lyx/index.htm 2001-06-25 New release LyX 1.1.6fix2b with small changes compared to LyX 1.1.6fix2a: * Fixed problem with missing index using MikTeX. * Fixed problem with pdf-update after any change in the lyx file. The last one sounds very interesting! Can this be aplied to the linux versions? Marcus By the way: IMHO www.lyx.org looks *much* better now, and is *much* better readable :-) Nice job!!
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
De> > Are you sure that you didn't have this problem with fix1 ? De> > I don't see how can this happen. De> De> > Maybe you updated latex and this caused the problem ? St> I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem St> exists on my system, too. St> St> I searched the archive about this problem: St> St> Is it possible that it's caused by some optimizing compiling St> options of gcc as mentioned earlier? St> St> If it's so, how can the source made robust to be protected St> about this "optimizations"? Is it possible, that Claus Hentschel has fixed this problem for the windows release? I have found this on http://www.fh-hannover.de/mbau/tim/hentschel/lyx/index.htm 2001-06-25 New release LyX 1.1.6fix2b with small changes compared to LyX 1.1.6fix2a: * Fixed problem with missing index using MikTeX. * Fixed problem with pdf-update after any change in the lyx file. The last one sounds very interesting! Can this be aplied to the linux versions? Marcus By the way: IMHO www.lyx.org looks *much* better now, and is *much* better readable :-) Nice job!!
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:10:21PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: It is possible to disable compiler optimization if the compiler is gcc 2.96 (but recent versions of gcc 2.96 work correctly, so people with older version should really upgrade). Just to be clear: the latest available upgrade for RedHat 7.0 is still buggy. regards, john -- Euler's equation contains the five most important numbers in mathematics.
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:07:26PM +0200, Steffen Seufert wrote: I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem exists on my system, too. I searched the archive about this problem: Is it possible that it's caused by some optimizing compiling options of gcc as mentioned earlier? It is possible. If it's so, how can the source made robust to be protected about this optimizations? It is possible to disable compiler optimization if the compiler is gcc 2.96 (but recent versions of gcc 2.96 work correctly, so people with older version should really upgrade).
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:10:21PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: It is possible to disable compiler optimization if the compiler is gcc 2.96 (but recent versions of gcc 2.96 work correctly, so people with older version should really upgrade). Just to be clear: the latest available upgrade for RedHat 7.0 is still buggy. regards, john -- Euler's equation contains the five most important numbers in mathematics.
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:07:26PM +0200, Steffen Seufert wrote: > I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem > exists on my system, too. > > I searched the archive about this problem: > > Is it possible that it's caused by some optimizing compiling > options of gcc as mentioned earlier? It is possible. > If it's so, how can the source made robust to be protected > about this "optimizations"? It is possible to disable compiler optimization if the compiler is gcc 2.96 (but recent versions of gcc 2.96 work correctly, so people with older version should really upgrade).
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:10:21PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > It is possible to disable compiler optimization if the compiler is gcc 2.96 > (but recent versions of gcc 2.96 work correctly, so people with older > version should really upgrade). Just to be clear: the latest available upgrade for RedHat 7.0 is still buggy. regards, john -- "Euler's equation contains the five most important numbers in mathematics."
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JMarc I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. Marcus Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere? Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon? JMarc
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JMarc I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. Marcus Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere? Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon? That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2. Marcus
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Beyer, == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marcus That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2. Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?) JMarc
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2. JMarc Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure JMarc that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?) I am not quite sure if I understand you. Certainly there are many bugs fixed from fix1 to fix2. And that is very nice. (thank you!) But this bug is a new one (since fix2), and it is annoying. So I wouldn't have installed fix2 on my Windows system, which always costs me serveral hours. And oscillating between different versions is not so easy as with unix/linux, because the installation procedure changed a lot during the last versions. Marcus
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JMarc I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. Marcus Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere? Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon? JMarc
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JMarc I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. Marcus Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere? Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon? That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2. Marcus
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Beyer, == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marcus That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2. Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?) JMarc
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2. JMarc Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure JMarc that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?) I am not quite sure if I understand you. Certainly there are many bugs fixed from fix1 to fix2. And that is very nice. (thank you!) But this bug is a new one (since fix2), and it is annoying. So I wouldn't have installed fix2 on my Windows system, which always costs me serveral hours. And oscillating between different versions is not so easy as with unix/linux, because the installation procedure changed a lot during the last versions. Marcus
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:39:06PM +0200, Beyer, Marcus wrote: I am not quite sure if I understand you. Certainly there are many bugs fixed from fix1 to fix2. And that is very nice. (thank you!) But this bug is a new one (since fix2), and it is annoying. So I wouldn't have installed fix2 on my Windows system, which always costs me serveral hours. And oscillating between different versions is not so easy as with unix/linux, because the installation procedure changed a lot during the last versions. Are you sure that you didn't have this problem with fix1 ? I don't see how can this happen. Maybe you updated latex and this caused the problem ?
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
> "Marcus" == Beyer, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. Marcus> Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere? Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon? JMarc
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
> > "Marcus" == Beyer, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > JMarc> I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. > > Marcus> Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere? > > Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon? That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2. Marcus
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
> "Beyer," == Beyer, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marcus> That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2. Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?) JMarc
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus> That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2. JMarc > Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure JMarc > that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?) I am not quite sure if I understand you. Certainly there are many bugs fixed from fix1 to fix2. And that is very nice. (thank you!) But this bug is a new one (since fix2), and it is annoying. So I wouldn't have installed fix2 on my Windows system, which always costs me serveral hours. And oscillating between different versions is not so easy as with unix/linux, because the installation procedure changed a lot during the last versions. Marcus
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:39:06PM +0200, Beyer, Marcus wrote: > I am not quite sure if I understand you. > Certainly there are many bugs fixed from fix1 to fix2. > And that is very nice. (thank you!) > > But this bug is a new one (since fix2), and it is annoying. > > So I wouldn't have installed fix2 on my Windows system, > which always costs me serveral hours. > And oscillating between different versions is not so > easy as with unix/linux, because the installation > procedure changed a lot during the last versions. Are you sure that you didn't have this problem with fix1 ? I don't see how can this happen. Maybe you updated latex and this caused the problem ?
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex. Marcus Doing 1. View - PDF (pdflatex) on a document, 2. close the Marcus viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4. Marcus then do View - PDF (pdflatex) again, the changes are not in Marcus the target document (pdf). JMarc I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere? Marcus
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex. Marcus Doing 1. View - PDF (pdflatex) on a document, 2. close the Marcus viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4. Marcus then do View - PDF (pdflatex) again, the changes are not in Marcus the target document (pdf). JMarc I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere? Marcus
RE: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus> Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex. Marcus> Doing 1. "View -> PDF (pdflatex)" on a document, 2. close the Marcus> viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4. Marcus> then do "View -> PDF (pdflatex)" again, the changes are not in Marcus> the target document (pdf). JMarc > I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere? Marcus
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marcus Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex. Marcus Doing 1. View - PDF (pdflatex) on a document, 2. close the Marcus viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4. Marcus then do View - PDF (pdflatex) again, the changes are not in Marcus the target document (pdf). I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. JMarc
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marcus Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex. Marcus Doing 1. View - PDF (pdflatex) on a document, 2. close the Marcus viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4. Marcus then do View - PDF (pdflatex) again, the changes are not in Marcus the target document (pdf). I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. JMarc
Re: problem with 116fix2 and pdflatex
> "Marcus" == Beyer, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marcus> Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex. Marcus> Doing 1. "View -> PDF (pdflatex)" on a document, 2. close the Marcus> viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4. Marcus> then do "View -> PDF (pdflatex)" again, the changes are not in Marcus> the target document (pdf). I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3. JMarc
