Re: LaTex question: KOMA-script headers and chapter bibliography

2015-04-29 Thread Johannes Böttcher
On 04/29/2015 06:40 AM, Sam Lewis wrote: I create running headers in a Koma-script book with the following. This gives me a page number and the chapter heading on each page, except on the first page of each chapter as desired. \usepackage[automark]{scrlayer-scrpage}

Re: LaTex question: KOMA-script headers and chapter bibliography

2015-04-29 Thread Sam Lewis
On Thursday, 30 April 2015, 2:03, Johannes Böttcher wrote: You are defining `defbibheading` in a way that updates the running header with *Further Reading* via `markboth`. Deleting this line should fix your problem. If you really want to have the chapter titles on the starting pages of

Re: LaTex question: KOMA-script headers and chapter bibliography

2015-04-29 Thread Johannes Böttcher
On 04/29/2015 06:40 AM, Sam Lewis wrote: I create running headers in a Koma-script book with the following. This gives me a page number and the chapter heading on each page, except on the first page of each chapter as desired. \usepackage[automark]{scrlayer-scrpage}

Re: LaTex question: KOMA-script headers and chapter bibliography

2015-04-29 Thread Sam Lewis
On Thursday, 30 April 2015, 2:03, Johannes Böttcher wrote: You are defining `defbibheading` in a way that updates the running header with *Further Reading* via `markboth`. Deleting this line should fix your problem. If you really want to have the chapter titles on the starting pages of

Re: LaTex question: KOMA-script headers and chapter bibliography

2015-04-29 Thread Johannes Böttcher
On 04/29/2015 06:40 AM, Sam Lewis wrote: > I create running headers in a Koma-script book with the following. This gives me a page number and the chapter heading on each page, except on the first page of each chapter as desired. > > \usepackage[automark]{scrlayer-scrpage} >

Re: LaTex question: KOMA-script headers and chapter bibliography

2015-04-29 Thread Sam Lewis
> On Thursday, 30 April 2015, 2:03, Johannes Böttcher wrote: > You are defining `defbibheading` in a way that updates the running > header with *Further Reading* via `markboth`. Deleting this line should > fix your problem. > > If you really want to have the chapter titles on the starting

Re: LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 10/29/2012 08:13 AM, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear Group, This is more of a LaTeX question rather than a LyX question, but I know there are many LaTeX experts here, too, so here goes. I'm currently working with a set of fluids equations which have both velocity and volume terms. Given how

Re : LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
Wow, this is comprehensive indeed! Thank you Richard! Rob, you could maybe use mathcal form for one the v's, to distinguish it from the other. -- Murat Yildizoglu http://yildizoglu.info Le lundi 29 octobre 2012 à 14:28, Richard Heck a écrit : On 10/29/2012 08:13 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:

Re: LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2012-10-29, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear Group, This is more of a LaTeX question rather than a LyX question, but I know there are many LaTeX experts here, too, so here goes. I'm currently working with a set of fluids equations which have both velocity and volume terms. Given how frequently the

Re: LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 30/10/2012 3:35 a.m., Guenter Milde wrote: On 2012-10-29, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear Group, This is more of a LaTeX question rather than a LyX question, but I know there are many LaTeX experts here, too, so here goes. I'm currently working with a set of fluids equations which have both

Re: LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 10/29/2012 08:13 AM, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear Group, This is more of a LaTeX question rather than a LyX question, but I know there are many LaTeX experts here, too, so here goes. I'm currently working with a set of fluids equations which have both velocity and volume terms. Given how

Re : LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
Wow, this is comprehensive indeed! Thank you Richard! Rob, you could maybe use mathcal form for one the v's, to distinguish it from the other. -- Murat Yildizoglu http://yildizoglu.info Le lundi 29 octobre 2012 à 14:28, Richard Heck a écrit : On 10/29/2012 08:13 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:

Re: LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2012-10-29, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear Group, This is more of a LaTeX question rather than a LyX question, but I know there are many LaTeX experts here, too, so here goes. I'm currently working with a set of fluids equations which have both velocity and volume terms. Given how frequently the

Re: LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 30/10/2012 3:35 a.m., Guenter Milde wrote: On 2012-10-29, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear Group, This is more of a LaTeX question rather than a LyX question, but I know there are many LaTeX experts here, too, so here goes. I'm currently working with a set of fluids equations which have both

Re: LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 10/29/2012 08:13 AM, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear Group, This is more of a LaTeX question rather than a LyX question, but I know there are many LaTeX experts here, too, so here goes. I'm currently working with a set of fluids equations which have both velocity and volume terms. Given how

Re : LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
Wow, this is comprehensive indeed! Thank you Richard! Rob, you could maybe use mathcal form for one the v's, to distinguish it from the other. -- Murat Yildizoglu http://yildizoglu.info Le lundi 29 octobre 2012 à 14:28, Richard Heck a écrit : > On 10/29/2012 08:13 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:

Re: LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2012-10-29, Rob Oakes wrote: > Dear Group, > This is more of a LaTeX question rather than a LyX question, but I know > there are many LaTeX experts here, too, so here goes. > I'm currently working with a set of fluids equations which have both > velocity and volume terms. Given how frequently

Re: LaTeX Question

2012-10-29 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 30/10/2012 3:35 a.m., Guenter Milde wrote: On 2012-10-29, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear Group, This is more of a LaTeX question rather than a LyX question, but I know there are many LaTeX experts here, too, so here goes. I'm currently working with a set of fluids equations which have both

Re: latex question

2012-03-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/09/2012 07:46 AM, paul sutton wrote: Hi I am using kile (latex editor for kde) and have created a simple how to file, the code is below, what is happening is that it compiles fine, however where I have the picture inserted this a appears first then the text that in the source is

Re: latex question

2012-03-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/09/2012 07:46 AM, paul sutton wrote: Hi I am using kile (latex editor for kde) and have created a simple how to file, the code is below, what is happening is that it compiles fine, however where I have the picture inserted this a appears first then the text that in the source is

Re: latex question

2012-03-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/09/2012 07:46 AM, paul sutton wrote: Hi I am using kile (latex editor for kde) and have created a simple how to file, the code is below, what is happening is that it compiles fine, however where I have the picture inserted this a appears first then the text that in the source is

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 04/04/11 21:47, Hellmut Weber a écrit : Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to my LyX document as string in the document.

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Hellmut Weber
Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/05/2011 03:20 AM, Hellmut Weber wrote: To make clear what I'm looking for I put it in python code: leo@sylhepta ~ $ python Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Sep 15 2010, 15:52:39) [GCC 4.4.5] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. def shorten_path(path, len):

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Hellmut Weber
Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Julien Rioux
On 05/04/2011 7:21 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/05/2011 07:28 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 05/04/2011 7:21 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 04/04/11 21:47, Hellmut Weber a écrit : Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to my LyX document as string in the document.

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Hellmut Weber
Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/05/2011 03:20 AM, Hellmut Weber wrote: To make clear what I'm looking for I put it in python code: leo@sylhepta ~ $ python Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Sep 15 2010, 15:52:39) [GCC 4.4.5] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. def shorten_path(path, len):

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Hellmut Weber
Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Julien Rioux
On 05/04/2011 7:21 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/05/2011 07:28 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 05/04/2011 7:21 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 04/04/11 21:47, Hellmut Weber a écrit : Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to my LyX document as string in the document.

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Hellmut Weber
Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: > On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: >> Hi list, >> recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro >> >>\input@path >> >> mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) >> in an ERT eventually gives me the

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/05/2011 03:20 AM, Hellmut Weber wrote: To make clear what I'm looking for I put it in python code: leo@sylhepta ~ $ python Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Sep 15 2010, 15:52:39) [GCC 4.4.5] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. def shorten_path(path,

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Hellmut Weber
Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: > On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: >> Hi list, >> recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro >> >>\input@path >> >> mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) >> in an ERT eventually gives me the

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Julien Rioux
On 05/04/2011 7:21 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-05 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/05/2011 07:28 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 05/04/2011 7:21 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Am 04.04.2011 23:32, schrieb Julien Rioux: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to my LyX document as string in the document.

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/04/2011 5:32 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to my LyX

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/04/2011 05:32 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: kludge solution, if you know how deep your paths are: \def\removeprefixx/#1/#2/#3/#4/#5{Your path is /.../#5} \def\removeprefix#1{\expandafter\removeprefixx#1} Can you explain the point of the \expandafter? I see this often, but don't understand

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/04/2011 5:54 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/04/2011 05:32 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: kludge solution, if you know how deep your paths are: \def\removeprefixx/#1/#2/#3/#4/#5{Your path is /.../#5} \def\removeprefix#1{\expandafter\removeprefixx#1} Can you explain the point of the

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to my LyX document as string in the document.

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/04/2011 5:32 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to my LyX

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/04/2011 05:32 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: kludge solution, if you know how deep your paths are: \def\removeprefixx/#1/#2/#3/#4/#5{Your path is /.../#5} \def\removeprefix#1{\expandafter\removeprefixx#1} Can you explain the point of the \expandafter? I see this often, but don't understand

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/04/2011 5:54 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/04/2011 05:32 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: kludge solution, if you know how deep your paths are: \def\removeprefixx/#1/#2/#3/#4/#5{Your path is /.../#5} \def\removeprefix#1{\expandafter\removeprefixx#1} Can you explain the point of the

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to my LyX document as string in the document.

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/04/2011 5:32 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 04/04/2011 3:47 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: Hi list, recently in another post I found the internal LaTeX macro \input@path mentioned. Putting this (surrounded by \makeatletter and \makeatother) in an ERT eventually gives me the correct path to my LyX

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/04/2011 05:32 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: kludge solution, if you know how deep your paths are: \def\removeprefixx/#1/#2/#3/#4/#5{Your path is /.../#5} \def\removeprefix#1{\expandafter\removeprefixx#1} Can you explain the point of the \expandafter? I see this often, but don't understand

Re: LaTeX question w.r.t \input@path

2011-04-04 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/04/2011 5:54 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/04/2011 05:32 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: kludge solution, if you know how deep your paths are: \def\removeprefixx/#1/#2/#3/#4/#5{Your path is /.../#5} \def\removeprefix#1{\expandafter\removeprefixx#1} Can you explain the point of the

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-17 Thread Helge Hafting
Daniel CLEMENT wrote: Also possible : Place the cross-reference to the labeled footnote in a superscript, so that it will appear as a note too. Thus you get twice the same reference to the same footnote, they look alike, and the numbering si preserved. Be careful if your footnotes are set

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-17 Thread Helge Hafting
Daniel CLEMENT wrote: Also possible : Place the cross-reference to the labeled footnote in a superscript, so that it will appear as a note too. Thus you get twice the same reference to the same footnote, they look alike, and the numbering si preserved. Be careful if your footnotes are set

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-17 Thread Helge Hafting
Daniel CLEMENT wrote: Also possible : Place the cross-reference to the labeled footnote in a superscript, so that it will appear as a note too. Thus you get twice the same reference to the same footnote, they look alike, and the numbering si preserved. Be careful if your footnotes are set

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Neal Becker
Neal Becker wrote: I have a description env, and I have some notes for some entries. I was planning to use footnotes, but I need multiple references to the _same_ notes. Like: entry A: 1 entry B: 1 entry C: 2 1: some footnote 2: some other footnote It looks like floatmisc package

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Les Denham
On Friday 11 January 2008 08:25, Neal Becker wrote: I have a description env, and I have some notes for some entries. I was planning to use footnotes, but I need multiple references to the _same_ notes. Like: entry A: 1 entry B: 1 entry C: 2 1: some footnote 2: some other footnote

RE: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dominik Wa?enhoven Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:19 PM To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote? Neal Becker schrieb: Strangely, lyx allows inserting a label into a footnote, but I don't see how to use this as a reference

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Dominik Waßenhoven
Neal Becker schrieb: Strangely, lyx allows inserting a label into a footnote, but I don't see how to use this as a reference (that would appear formatted in the style of a footnote). You could do something like 1: [label-in-footnote] This is a footnote. 2: On this topic, see footnote

RE: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dominik Wa?enhoven Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:19 PM To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote? Neal Becker schrieb: Strangely, lyx allows inserting a label into a footnote, but I don't see how to use this as a reference

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Neal Becker
Neal Becker wrote: I have a description env, and I have some notes for some entries. I was planning to use footnotes, but I need multiple references to the _same_ notes. Like: entry A: 1 entry B: 1 entry C: 2 1: some footnote 2: some other footnote It looks like floatmisc package

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Les Denham
On Friday 11 January 2008 08:25, Neal Becker wrote: I have a description env, and I have some notes for some entries. I was planning to use footnotes, but I need multiple references to the _same_ notes. Like: entry A: 1 entry B: 1 entry C: 2 1: some footnote 2: some other footnote

RE: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dominik Wa?enhoven Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:19 PM To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote? Neal Becker schrieb: Strangely, lyx allows inserting a label into a footnote, but I don't see how to use this as a reference

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Dominik Waßenhoven
Neal Becker schrieb: Strangely, lyx allows inserting a label into a footnote, but I don't see how to use this as a reference (that would appear formatted in the style of a footnote). You could do something like 1: [label-in-footnote] This is a footnote. 2: On this topic, see footnote

RE: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dominik Wa?enhoven Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:19 PM To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote? Neal Becker schrieb: Strangely, lyx allows inserting a label into a footnote, but I don't see how to use this as a reference

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Neal Becker
Neal Becker wrote: > I have a description env, and I have some notes for some entries. I was > planning to use footnotes, but I need multiple references to the _same_ > notes. > > Like: > > entry A: 1 > entry B: 1 > entry C: 2 > > 1: some footnote > 2: some other footnote It looks like

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Les Denham
On Friday 11 January 2008 08:25, Neal Becker wrote: > I have a description env, and I have some notes for some entries. I was > planning to use footnotes, but I need multiple references to the _same_ > notes. > > Like: > > entry A: 1 > entry B: 1 > entry C: 2 > > 1: some footnote > 2: some other

RE: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dominik Wa?enhoven > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:19 PM > To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org > Subject: Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote? > > > Neal Becker schrieb: > > > Strangely, lyx allows inserting a label into a footnote,

Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Dominik Waßenhoven
Neal Becker schrieb: > Strangely, lyx allows inserting a label into a footnote, but I don't see how > to use this as a reference (that would appear formatted in the style of a > footnote). You could do something like 1: [label-in-footnote] This is a footnote. 2: On this topic, see footnote

RE: (latex question) Repeated footnote?

2008-01-11 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dominik Wa?enhoven > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:19 PM > To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org > Subject: Re: (latex question) Repeated footnote? > > > Neal Becker schrieb: > > > Strangely, lyx allows inserting a label into a footnote,

Re: LaTeX question

2007-07-18 Thread William Adams
On Jul 17, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: AS LONG AS you don't have illegal cahrs in your path (Like '_' which I use quite a lot. Does anybody know how to modify TeX strings as 'Test_01' to 'Test \_01', i.e. escape the illegal chars with a backslash. I'm sure it is possible but my

Re: LaTeX question

2007-07-18 Thread Hellmut Weber
Hi William, this certainly will do it ;-) Change the catcode so that underscore is treated as a letter instead: \catcode`\_=12\relax should do it. Many thanks Hellmut -- Dr. Hellmut Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 D-80803 München-Schwabing

Re: LaTeX question

2007-07-18 Thread William Adams
On Jul 17, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: AS LONG AS you don't have illegal cahrs in your path (Like '_' which I use quite a lot. Does anybody know how to modify TeX strings as 'Test_01' to 'Test \_01', i.e. escape the illegal chars with a backslash. I'm sure it is possible but my

Re: LaTeX question

2007-07-18 Thread Hellmut Weber
Hi William, this certainly will do it ;-) Change the catcode so that underscore is treated as a letter instead: \catcode`\_=12\relax should do it. Many thanks Hellmut -- Dr. Hellmut Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 D-80803 München-Schwabing

Re: LaTeX question

2007-07-18 Thread William Adams
On Jul 17, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Hellmut Weber wrote: AS LONG AS you don't have "illegal" cahrs in your path (Like '_' which I use quite a lot. Does anybody know how to modify TeX strings as 'Test_01' to 'Test \_01', i.e. escape the illegal chars with a backslash. I'm sure it is possible but

Re: LaTeX question

2007-07-18 Thread Hellmut Weber
Hi William, this certainly will do it ;-) Change the catcode so that underscore is treated as a letter instead: \catcode`\_=12\relax should do it. Many thanks Hellmut -- Dr. Hellmut Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 D-80803 München-Schwabing

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin A. Hansen wrote: author = {Smith, J.F.}, and ends up as Smith, J. now, it has not been possible for me to verify that the author format in the bibtex file is ok. (the problem is solved if i introduce a blank between the initials - J. F., but i think that is wrong and a freak fluke

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Martin A. Hansen
my bibtex file is generated from the medline format - a large bibliographic collection of life science publications - and there they truncate the names to initials and surname. now, the medline2bibtex convertions is done by pybliographer which gives bibtex files with: author = {Smith, J.F.} it

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:48 PM Subject: Re: latex question my bibtex file is generated from the medline format - a large bibliographic collection of life science publications - and there they truncate the names to initials and surname. now, the medline2bibtex convertions is done

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin A. Hansen wrote: now, the medline2bibtex convertions is done by pybliographer which gives bibtex files with: author = {Smith, J.F.} it is possible that publiographer is wrong here - but i have not been able to locate a precise description of the bibtex file format. It is. Bibtex knows

Re: latex question (SOLVED)

2005-06-02 Thread Martin A. Hansen
you are beautiful people :o) a space between J.F. did the trick. if i ever was to cite you guys, your initials would now come out correct :o sincerely martin On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:12:08PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin A. Hansen wrote: now, the medline2bibtex

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Jean-Pierre Chretien
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:48:31 +0200 To: Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: latex question From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin A. Hansen) it is possible that publiographer is wrong here - but i have not been able to locate a precise description

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin A. Hansen wrote: author = {Smith, J.F.}, and ends up as Smith, J. now, it has not been possible for me to verify that the author format in the bibtex file is ok. (the problem is solved if i introduce a blank between the initials - J. F., but i think that is wrong and a freak fluke

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Martin A. Hansen
my bibtex file is generated from the medline format - a large bibliographic collection of life science publications - and there they truncate the names to initials and surname. now, the medline2bibtex convertions is done by pybliographer which gives bibtex files with: author = {Smith, J.F.} it

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:48 PM Subject: Re: latex question my bibtex file is generated from the medline format - a large bibliographic collection of life science publications - and there they truncate the names to initials and surname. now, the medline2bibtex convertions is done

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin A. Hansen wrote: now, the medline2bibtex convertions is done by pybliographer which gives bibtex files with: author = {Smith, J.F.} it is possible that publiographer is wrong here - but i have not been able to locate a precise description of the bibtex file format. It is. Bibtex knows

Re: latex question (SOLVED)

2005-06-02 Thread Martin A. Hansen
you are beautiful people :o) a space between J.F. did the trick. if i ever was to cite you guys, your initials would now come out correct :o sincerely martin On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:12:08PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Martin A. Hansen wrote: now, the medline2bibtex

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Jean-Pierre Chretien
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:48:31 +0200 To: Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: latex question From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin A. Hansen) it is possible that publiographer is wrong here - but i have not been able to locate a precise description

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin A. Hansen wrote: > author = {Smith, J.F.}, and ends up as Smith, J. > > now, it has not been possible for me to verify that the author format in > the bibtex file is ok. (the problem is solved if i introduce a blank > between the initials -> J. F., but i think that is wrong and a freak >

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Martin A. Hansen
my bibtex file is generated from the medline format - a large bibliographic collection of life science publications - and there they truncate the names to initials and surname. now, the medline2bibtex convertions is done by pybliographer which gives bibtex files with: author = {Smith, J.F.} it

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
IL PROTECTED]> Cc: <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:48 PM Subject: Re: latex question my bibtex file is generated from the medline format - a large bibliographic collection of life science publications - and there they truncate the names to initials and surname. now,

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin A. Hansen wrote: > now, the medline2bibtex convertions is done by pybliographer which gives > bibtex files with: author = {Smith, J.F.} > > it is possible that publiographer is wrong here - but i have not been > able to locate a precise description of the bibtex file format. It is. Bibtex

Re: latex question (SOLVED)

2005-06-02 Thread Martin A. Hansen
you are beautiful people :o) a space between J.F. did the trick. if i ever was to cite you guys, your initials would now come out correct :o sincerely martin On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:12:08PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin A. Hansen wrote: > > now, the medline2bibtex

Re: latex question

2005-06-02 Thread Jean-Pierre Chretien
>>Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:48:31 +0200 >>To: Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org >>Subject: Re: latex question >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin A. Hansen) >>it is possible that publiographer is wrong here - but

Re: LaTeX Question: Sector Symbol

2004-09-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Bruce Pourciau wrote: I've looked in Gratzer, Kopka-Daley, and Goossens et al, but I can't find how to get the symbol for a sector (a slice of pie shaped region). Any one know? Bruce, I did not see it in the LaTeX Comprehensive Symbol List; you might. Get a copy on CTAN.

Re: LaTeX Question: Sector Symbol

2004-09-30 Thread Les Denham
On Thursday 30 September 2004 10:20, Rich Shepard wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Bruce Pourciau wrote: I've looked in Gratzer, Kopka-Daley, and Goossens et al, but I can't find how to get the symbol for a sector (a slice of pie shaped region). Any one know? Bruce, I did not see it in

Re: LaTeX Question: Sector Symbol

2004-09-30 Thread Bruce Pourciau
Thanks, Rich and Les. Bruce On Thursday, September 30, 2004, at 10:32 AM, Les Denham wrote: On Thursday 30 September 2004 10:20, Rich Shepard wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Bruce Pourciau wrote: I've looked in Gratzer, Kopka-Daley, and Goossens et al, but I can't find how to get the symbol for a

Re: LaTeX Question: Sector Symbol

2004-09-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Bruce Pourciau wrote: I've looked in Gratzer, Kopka-Daley, and Goossens et al, but I can't find how to get the symbol for a sector (a slice of pie shaped region). Any one know? Bruce, I did not see it in the LaTeX Comprehensive Symbol List; you might. Get a copy on CTAN.

Re: LaTeX Question: Sector Symbol

2004-09-30 Thread Les Denham
On Thursday 30 September 2004 10:20, Rich Shepard wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Bruce Pourciau wrote: I've looked in Gratzer, Kopka-Daley, and Goossens et al, but I can't find how to get the symbol for a sector (a slice of pie shaped region). Any one know? Bruce, I did not see it in

Re: LaTeX Question: Sector Symbol

2004-09-30 Thread Bruce Pourciau
Thanks, Rich and Les. Bruce On Thursday, September 30, 2004, at 10:32 AM, Les Denham wrote: On Thursday 30 September 2004 10:20, Rich Shepard wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Bruce Pourciau wrote: I've looked in Gratzer, Kopka-Daley, and Goossens et al, but I can't find how to get the symbol for a

Re: LaTeX Question: Sector Symbol

2004-09-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Bruce Pourciau wrote: I've looked in Gratzer, Kopka-Daley, and Goossens et al, but I can't find how to get the symbol for a sector (a slice of pie shaped region). Any one know? Bruce, I did not see it in the LaTeX Comprehensive Symbol List; you might. Get a copy on CTAN.

  1   2   >