Short attachments (was Re: Bibliographic entries)

2003-11-15 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote: Good point... I think this list in general accept _short_ attachments (typically .lyx or .layout-file illustrating a problem)... I could be wrong though :-) Christian, Not to flog a dead

Re: Short attachments (was Re: Bibliographic entries)

2003-11-15 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote: Flog away..., IMO the question is relvant in general to user's of this list.. (I'd say 3+K is short but I'm on 10Mbit...) Actually, the expression minimal example file comes to mind... so I guess in general it's ok with attachments if they

Short attachments (was Re: Bibliographic entries)

2003-11-15 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote: Good point... I think this list in general accept _short_ attachments (typically .lyx or .layout-file illustrating a problem)... I could be wrong though :-) Christian, Not to flog a dead

Re: Short attachments (was Re: Bibliographic entries)

2003-11-15 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote: Flog away..., IMO the question is relvant in general to user's of this list.. (I'd say 3+K is short but I'm on 10Mbit...) Actually, the expression minimal example file comes to mind... so I guess in general it's ok with attachments if they

Short attachments (was Re: Bibliographic entries)

2003-11-15 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote: > > > Good point... I think this "list" in general accept _short_ attachments > > (typically .lyx or .layout-file illustrating a problem)... I could be > > wrong though :-) > > Christian, > > Not to

Re: Short attachments (was Re: Bibliographic entries)

2003-11-15 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote: > Flog away..., IMO the question is relvant in general to user's of this > list.. (I'd say 3+K is short but I'm on 10Mbit...) > > Actually, the expression "minimal example file" comes to mind... so > I guess in general it's ok with attachments if