José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
>> > reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
>> >
José Matos wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it correct, and just a
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
> > reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
> > making it correct, and just after we should m
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
> reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
> making it correct, and just after we should make it fast. :-)
It seems that this time has come :)
JMarc
On Sunday 26 October 2008 20:38:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
> > conversion is taking place.
>
> And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
> this is pos
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
> conversion is taking place.
And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
this is possible in python?
JMarc
On 25/10/2008 19:26, William Seager wrote:
On October 25, 2008 12:34:14 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I guess the 37 seconds you are seeing is probably due to lyx2lyx
conversion
OK, I'm an idiot.
You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
conversion is taking place.
Of c
On October 25, 2008 12:34:14 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I guess the 37 seconds you are seeing is probably due to lyx2lyx
> conversion
OK, I'm an idiot. Of course that was the problem - instant loading once
the 1.6 format version was in place :)
--
William Seager
University of Toronto Scarborough
On 25/10/2008 17:49, William Seager wrote:
Hi all. I'm not sure this is a problem or just reflects
the unfinished state of lyx 1.6. But I have a large-ish
document (about 140 pages when output to pdf).
On my old slow laptop running lyx 1.5.6 (under gentoo
linux btw) this loads in 2 seconds. On my
Hi all. I'm not sure this is a problem or just reflects
the unfinished state of lyx 1.6. But I have a large-ish
document (about 140 pages when output to pdf).
On my old slow laptop running lyx 1.5.6 (under gentoo
linux btw) this loads in 2 seconds. On my fast, dual
core amd64 architecture (also gen
10 matches
Mail list logo