Re: lyx 1.6rc4 ultra slow to load document

2008-10-29 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are >> > reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on >> >

Re: lyx 1.6rc4 ultra slow to load document

2008-10-27 Thread rgheck
José Matos wrote: On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on making it correct, and just a

Re: lyx 1.6rc4 ultra slow to load document

2008-10-27 Thread José Matos
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are > > reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on > > making it correct, and just after we should m

Re: lyx 1.6rc4 ultra slow to load document

2008-10-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are > reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on > making it correct, and just after we should make it fast. :-) It seems that this time has come :) JMarc

Re: lyx 1.6rc4 ultra slow to load document

2008-10-27 Thread José Matos
On Sunday 26 October 2008 20:38:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a > > conversion is taking place. > > And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess > this is pos

Re: lyx 1.6rc4 ultra slow to load document

2008-10-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a > conversion is taking place. And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess this is possible in python? JMarc

Re: lyx 1.6rc4 ultra slow to load document

2008-10-25 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 25/10/2008 19:26, William Seager wrote: On October 25, 2008 12:34:14 Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I guess the 37 seconds you are seeing is probably due to lyx2lyx conversion OK, I'm an idiot. You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a conversion is taking place. Of c

Re: lyx 1.6rc4 ultra slow to load document

2008-10-25 Thread William Seager
On October 25, 2008 12:34:14 Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > I guess the 37 seconds you are seeing is probably due to lyx2lyx > conversion OK, I'm an idiot. Of course that was the problem - instant loading once the 1.6 format version was in place :) -- William Seager University of Toronto Scarborough

Re: lyx 1.6rc4 ultra slow to load document

2008-10-25 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 25/10/2008 17:49, William Seager wrote: Hi all. I'm not sure this is a problem or just reflects the unfinished state of lyx 1.6. But I have a large-ish document (about 140 pages when output to pdf). On my old slow laptop running lyx 1.5.6 (under gentoo linux btw) this loads in 2 seconds. On my

lyx 1.6rc4 ultra slow to load document

2008-10-25 Thread William Seager
Hi all. I'm not sure this is a problem or just reflects the unfinished state of lyx 1.6. But I have a large-ish document (about 140 pages when output to pdf). On my old slow laptop running lyx 1.5.6 (under gentoo linux btw) this loads in 2 seconds. On my fast, dual core amd64 architecture (also gen