On 3.03.08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Conclusion: if you need bold math characters, Times Roman is not a good
choice (if you insist on mixing fonts that do not match, you can still
set the fonts to default in the SettingsDocumentFonts selection
boxes and in the
On 3.03.08, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
... if I have to choose between a close match between the math and text
fonts or having bold symbols, I'll typically take the bold symbols. I
don't produce books, and for pretty much everything else Times without
mathptmx seems
On Mar 3, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
If you don't _have_ to use Times, why not choose Palatino? It is a
beautiful face, unlike Times. I'm happy as a clam -- boldface and
all -- with \usepackage[osf]{mathpazo} in the preamble.
How well does that work with
On 3.03.08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Conclusion: if you need bold math characters, Times Roman is not a good
choice (if you insist on mixing fonts that do not match, you can still
set the fonts to default in the SettingsDocumentFonts selection
boxes and in the
On 3.03.08, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
... if I have to choose between a close match between the math and text
fonts or having bold symbols, I'll typically take the bold symbols. I
don't produce books, and for pretty much everything else Times without
mathptmx seems
On Mar 3, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
If you don't _have_ to use Times, why not choose Palatino? It is a
beautiful face, unlike Times. I'm happy as a clam -- boldface and
all -- with \usepackage[osf]{mathpazo} in the preamble.
How well does that work with
On 3.03.08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Conclusion: if you need bold math characters, Times Roman is not a good
> > choice (if you insist on mixing fonts that do not match, you can still
set the fonts to "default" in the Settings>Document>Fonts selection
boxes and
On 3.03.08, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Bruce Pourciau wrote:
> ... if I have to choose between a close match between the math and text
> fonts or having bold symbols, I'll typically take the bold symbols. I
> don't produce books, and for pretty much everything else Times without
> mathptmx
On Mar 3, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
If you don't _have_ to use Times, why not choose Palatino? It is a
beautiful face, unlike Times. I'm happy as a clam -- boldface and
all -- with \usepackage[osf]{mathpazo} in the preamble.
How well does that work with
Dear all
It seems that pdf output of boldsymbol math does not show properly when the
command \boldsymbol is used. I am using lyx-1.5.4 (compiled version using
kubuntu and texlive)
Open a new document (article) enter a math inset with \boldsymbol* an enter a
letter \boldsymbol{a}
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx automatically if
you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no bold
symbols, I can see this being a problem, and I'm surprised it was done.
In the short term, the workarounds are either to switch
Oscar Lopez wrote:
Dear all
It seems that pdf output of boldsymbol math does not show properly when the
command \boldsymbol is used. I am using lyx-1.5.4 (compiled version using
kubuntu and texlive)
Open a new document (article) enter a math inset with \boldsymbol* an enter a
letter
Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oscar Lopez wrote:
Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx automatically if
you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no bold
symbols, I can see this being a problem, and I'm surprised it was done.
Yes I
Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx automatically if
you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no bold
symbols, I can see this being a problem, and I'm surprised it was done.
In
Oscar Lopez wrote:
But as Paul has pointed out mathptmx has no bold symbols. Therefore lyx has
to load something to the preamble in the case math boldsymbols are
required. Either a \usepackage{bm} together with \usepackage{mathptmx} are
added or only \usepackage{bm} is loaded. Please note that
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Conclusion: if you need bold math characters, Times Roman is not a good
choice (if you insist on mixing fonts that do not match, you can still load
Times Roman as roman font only with
\def\rmdefault{ptm}
which is still better than \usepackage{times}).
There's also
On Mar 3, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Oscar Lopez wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx
automatically if
you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no
bold
symbols, I can see this being
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
If you don't _have_ to use Times, why not choose Palatino? It is a
beautiful face, unlike Times. I'm happy as a clam -- boldface and all --
with \usepackage[osf]{mathpazo} in the preamble.
How well does that work with PDF files?
One reason I use
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Assuming I'm using Times, if I have to choose between a close match
between the math and text fonts or having bold symbols, I'll typically
take the bold symbols.
I think the choice is between a good match between math and text, but
(somewhat)
Dear all
It seems that pdf output of boldsymbol math does not show properly when the
command \boldsymbol is used. I am using lyx-1.5.4 (compiled version using
kubuntu and texlive)
Open a new document (article) enter a math inset with \boldsymbol* an enter a
letter \boldsymbol{a}
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx automatically if
you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no bold
symbols, I can see this being a problem, and I'm surprised it was done.
In the short term, the workarounds are either to switch
Oscar Lopez wrote:
Dear all
It seems that pdf output of boldsymbol math does not show properly when the
command \boldsymbol is used. I am using lyx-1.5.4 (compiled version using
kubuntu and texlive)
Open a new document (article) enter a math inset with \boldsymbol* an enter a
letter
Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oscar Lopez wrote:
Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx automatically if
you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no bold
symbols, I can see this being a problem, and I'm surprised it was done.
Yes I
Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx automatically if
you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no bold
symbols, I can see this being a problem, and I'm surprised it was done.
In
Oscar Lopez wrote:
But as Paul has pointed out mathptmx has no bold symbols. Therefore lyx has
to load something to the preamble in the case math boldsymbols are
required. Either a \usepackage{bm} together with \usepackage{mathptmx} are
added or only \usepackage{bm} is loaded. Please note that
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Conclusion: if you need bold math characters, Times Roman is not a good
choice (if you insist on mixing fonts that do not match, you can still load
Times Roman as roman font only with
\def\rmdefault{ptm}
which is still better than \usepackage{times}).
There's also
On Mar 3, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Oscar Lopez wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx
automatically if
you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no
bold
symbols, I can see this being
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
If you don't _have_ to use Times, why not choose Palatino? It is a
beautiful face, unlike Times. I'm happy as a clam -- boldface and all --
with \usepackage[osf]{mathpazo} in the preamble.
How well does that work with PDF files?
One reason I use
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Assuming I'm using Times, if I have to choose between a close match
between the math and text fonts or having bold symbols, I'll typically
take the bold symbols.
I think the choice is between a good match between math and text, but
(somewhat)
Dear all
It seems that pdf output of boldsymbol math does not show properly when the
command \boldsymbol is used. I am using lyx-1.5.4 (compiled version using
kubuntu and texlive)
Open a new document (article) enter a math inset with \boldsymbol* an enter a
letter \boldsymbol{a}
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx automatically if
> you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no bold
> symbols, I can see this being a problem, and I'm surprised it was done.
> In the short term, the workarounds are either to
Oscar Lopez wrote:
Dear all
It seems that pdf output of boldsymbol math does not show properly when the
command \boldsymbol is used. I am using lyx-1.5.4 (compiled version using
kubuntu and texlive)
Open a new document (article) enter a math inset with \boldsymbol* an enter a
letter
Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Oscar Lopez wrote:
>
> Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx automatically if
> you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no bold
> symbols, I can see this being a problem, and I'm surprised it was done.
Yes
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> > Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx automatically if
> > you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no bold
> > symbols, I can see this being a problem, and I'm surprised it was
Oscar Lopez wrote:
> But as Paul has pointed out mathptmx has no bold symbols. Therefore lyx has
> to load something to the preamble in the case math boldsymbols are
> required. Either a \usepackage{bm} together with \usepackage{mathptmx} are
> added or only \usepackage{bm} is loaded. Please note
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Conclusion: if you need bold math characters, Times Roman is not a good
> choice (if you insist on mixing fonts that do not match, you can still load
> Times Roman as roman font only with
>
> \def\rmdefault{ptm}
>
> which is still better than \usepackage{times}).
On Mar 3, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Oscar Lopez wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Apparently, as of a recent version, LyX loads mathptmx
automatically if
you select Times Roman as your Roman font. Since mathptmx has no
bold
symbols, I can see this
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
If you don't _have_ to use Times, why not choose Palatino? It is a
beautiful face, unlike Times. I'm happy as a clam -- boldface and all --
with \usepackage[osf]{mathpazo} in the preamble.
How well does that work with PDF files?
One reason I use
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Assuming I'm using Times, if I have to choose between a close match
> between the math and text fonts or having bold symbols, I'll typically
> take the bold symbols.
I think the choice is between a good match between math and text, but
(somewhat)
39 matches
Mail list logo
