Thanks to all who responded to my requests for help to get LyX
working. It's now functioning fine... but tex2lyx has problems
translating my sample file so...
Having looked at Latex stuff a lot over the past few weeks as a Latex
newbie, could I ask a (heretical!?) question? Why isn't LyX
Thanks to all who responded to my requests for help to get LyX
working. It's now functioning fine... but tex2lyx has problems
translating my sample file so...
Having looked at Latex stuff a lot over the past few weeks as a Latex
newbie, could I ask a (heretical!?) question? Why isn't LyX
>Thanks to all who responded to my requests for help to get LyX
>working. It's now functioning fine... but tex2lyx has problems
>translating my sample file so...
>
>Having looked at Latex stuff a lot over the past few weeks as a Latex
>newbie, could I ask a (heretical!?) quest
Michael Wojcik wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
assume you see some advantages to LyX, right?
[This is late, but Paul's query doesn't seem to have
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:00:20PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
assume you see some advantages to LyX,
Michael Wojcik wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
assume you see some advantages to LyX, right?
[This is late, but Paul's query doesn't seem to have
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:00:20PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Michael Wojcik wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
assume you see some advantages to LyX,
Michael Wojcik wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
assume you see some advantages to LyX, right?
[This is late, but Paul's query doesn't seem to have
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:00:20PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Michael Wojcik wrote:
> >Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
> >>thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
> >>assume you see some
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
assume you see some advantages to LyX, right?
[This is late, but Paul's query doesn't seem to have garnered much
response.]
One
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
assume you see some advantages to LyX, right?
[This is late, but Paul's query doesn't seem to have garnered much
response.]
One
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
assume you see some advantages to LyX, right?
[This is late, but Paul's query doesn't seem to have garnered much
response.]
One
On Jul 25, 2005, at 11:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
William == William F Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William John's is much better though and should be enshrined in an
William FAQ or advocacy document or something.
What about making a
On Jul 25, 2005, at 11:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
William == William F Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William John's is much better though and should be enshrined in an
William FAQ or advocacy document or something.
What about making a
On Jul 25, 2005, at 11:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"William" == William F Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William> John's is much better though and should be enshrined in an
William> FAQ or advocacy document or something.
What about
John == John O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Sorry I didnot notice the reply-to was not the list.
I did not notice at the time that this answer only went to me. It was
a pity, since I really enjoyed reading it :)
JMarc
On Jul 24, 2005, at 9:26 PM, John O'Gorman wrote:
snip excellent discussion of my WYSIWYM is a good view
All of the above makes it easier to use LyX. You focus entirely on
content.
FWIW, I made a similar explanation in the Practical TeX on-line journal
recently:
William == William F Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William John's is much better though and should be enshrined in an
William FAQ or advocacy document or something.
What about making a page on the wiki?
JMarc
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
William == William F Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William John's is much better though and should be enshrined in an
William FAQ or advocacy document or something.
What about making a page on the wiki?
Sounds like a very good idea.
John == John O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Sorry I didnot notice the reply-to was not the list.
I did not notice at the time that this answer only went to me. It was
a pity, since I really enjoyed reading it :)
JMarc
On Jul 24, 2005, at 9:26 PM, John O'Gorman wrote:
snip excellent discussion of my WYSIWYM is a good view
All of the above makes it easier to use LyX. You focus entirely on
content.
FWIW, I made a similar explanation in the Practical TeX on-line journal
recently:
William == William F Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William John's is much better though and should be enshrined in an
William FAQ or advocacy document or something.
What about making a page on the wiki?
JMarc
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
William == William F Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William John's is much better though and should be enshrined in an
William FAQ or advocacy document or something.
What about making a page on the wiki?
Sounds like a very good idea.
> "John" == John O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Sorry I didnot notice the reply-to was not the list.
I did not notice at the time that this answer only went to me. It was
a pity, since I really enjoyed reading it :)
JMarc
On Jul 24, 2005, at 9:26 PM, John O'Gorman wrote:
excellent discussion of my WYSIWYM is a good view
All of the above makes it easier to use LyX. You focus entirely on
content.
FWIW, I made a similar explanation in the Practical TeX on-line journal
recently:
> "William" == William F Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William> John's is much better though and should be enshrined in an
William> FAQ or advocacy document or something.
What about making a page on the wiki?
JMarc
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "William" == William F Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> William> John's is much better though and should be enshrined in an
> William> FAQ or advocacy document or something.
>
> What about making a page on the wiki?
Sounds like a
; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Heretical question?
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Heretical question?
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
lla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Heretical question?
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTEC
Most of the mentioned projects seem to be quite young. Let us see how
they develop.
What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is
On Friday 22 July 2005 09:33, Axel Rasche wrote:
What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is open
to you. One can add any
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Friday 22 July 2005 09:33, Axel Rasche wrote:
What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is open
to you. One
Most of the mentioned projects seem to be quite young. Let us see how
they develop.
What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is
On Friday 22 July 2005 09:33, Axel Rasche wrote:
What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is open
to you. One can add any
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Friday 22 July 2005 09:33, Axel Rasche wrote:
What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is open
to you. One
Most of the mentioned projects seem to be quite young. Let us see how
they develop.
What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is
On Friday 22 July 2005 09:33, Axel Rasche wrote:
> What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
> figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
> not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is open
> to you. One can add any
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Friday 22 July 2005 09:33, Axel Rasche wrote:
What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is open
to you. One
Thanks to all who responded to my requests for help to get LyX working.
It's now functioning fine... but tex2lyx has problems translating my
sample file so...
Having looked at Latex stuff a lot over the past few weeks as a Latex
newbie, could I ask a (heretical!?) question? Why isn't LyX
Peter Rockett writes:
Why isn't LyX (or
something else) a fully fledged WYSIWYG word processor?
Or a structured document processor, etc. Short answer: if you build it,
they'll come -- i.e. someone has to have the time and inclination and
skills to do this.
In the meantime, it remains what
Peter Rockett wrote:
tex2lyx has problems translating my sample file
Then post your sample so that tex2lyx can be improved.
Why isn't LyX (or something else) a fully fledged WYSIWYG word processor?
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
--
Angus
Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
or (if you're on win)
http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
Jürgen
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
Juergen or (if you're on win)
Juergen http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
I did not know this one.
I guess there is also BaKoMa YeX
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
or (if you're on win)
http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
works also with wine under *nix and has an own homepage and
is a _real_ wysiwyg TeX
On Thursday 21 July 2005 06:59, Herbert Voss wrote:
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
or (if you're on win)
http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
works also with wine under *nix and has an own
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
Juergen or (if you're on win)
Juergen http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
I did not know this one.
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
assume you see some advantages to LyX, right?
I like it as a LaTeX front-end with a much shallower learning
Thanks to all who responded to my requests for help to get LyX working.
It's now functioning fine... but tex2lyx has problems translating my
sample file so...
Having looked at Latex stuff a lot over the past few weeks as a Latex
newbie, could I ask a (heretical!?) question? Why isn't LyX
Peter Rockett writes:
Why isn't LyX (or
something else) a fully fledged WYSIWYG word processor?
Or a structured document processor, etc. Short answer: if you build it,
they'll come -- i.e. someone has to have the time and inclination and
skills to do this.
In the meantime, it remains what
Peter Rockett wrote:
tex2lyx has problems translating my sample file
Then post your sample so that tex2lyx can be improved.
Why isn't LyX (or something else) a fully fledged WYSIWYG word processor?
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
--
Angus
Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
or (if you're on win)
http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
Jürgen
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
Juergen or (if you're on win)
Juergen http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
I did not know this one.
I guess there is also BaKoMa YeX
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
or (if you're on win)
http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
works also with wine under *nix and has an own homepage and
is a _real_ wysiwyg TeX
On Thursday 21 July 2005 06:59, Herbert Voss wrote:
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
or (if you're on win)
http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
works also with wine under *nix and has an own
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
Juergen or (if you're on win)
Juergen http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
I did not know this one.
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
assume you see some advantages to LyX, right?
I like it as a LaTeX front-end with a much shallower learning
Thanks to all who responded to my requests for help to get LyX working.
It's now functioning fine... but tex2lyx has problems translating my
sample file so...
Having looked at Latex stuff a lot over the past few weeks as a Latex
newbie, could I ask a (heretical!?) question? Why isn't LyX
Peter Rockett writes:
> Why isn't LyX (or
> something else) a fully fledged WYSIWYG word processor?
Or a structured document processor, etc. Short answer: "if you build it,
they'll come" -- i.e. someone has to have the time and inclination and
skills to do this.
In the meantime, it remains
Peter Rockett wrote:
> tex2lyx has problems translating my sample file
Then post your sample so that tex2lyx can be improved.
> Why isn't LyX (or something else) a fully fledged WYSIWYG word processor?
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
--
Angus
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
or (if you're on win)
http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
Jürgen
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
Juergen> or (if you're on win)
Juergen> http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
I did not know this one.
I guess there is
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
or (if you're on win)
http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
works also with wine under *nix and has an own homepage and
is a _real_ wysiwyg TeX
On Thursday 21 July 2005 06:59, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > Angus Leeming wrote:
> >>Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
> >
> > or (if you're on win)
> > http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
>
> works also with wine under *nix and has
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Angus Leeming wrote:
Perhaps you should check out http://www.texmacs.org/
Juergen> or (if you're on win)
Juergen> http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/systems/win32/microimp/
I did not know
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Can anyone summarize pros/cons of the various options listed in this
> thread? You're all using (and most are actively developing) LyX, so I
> assume you see some advantages to LyX, right?
I like it as a LaTeX front-end with a much shallower
66 matches
Mail list logo
