David L. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800
Adrian Robson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment)
in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single
definition. If I force some standard
David L. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800
Adrian Robson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment)
in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single
definition. If I force some standard
David L. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800
"Adrian Robson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment)
in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single
definition. If I force some
You can just put some ERT there, too. Even a LaTeX comment: %whatever.
It's true that there should be a better way.
Richard
Adrian Robson wrote:
I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment)
in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800
Adrian Robson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment)
in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single
definition. If I force some standard text between the two,
You can just put some ERT there, too. Even a LaTeX comment: %whatever.
It's true that there should be a better way.
Richard
Adrian Robson wrote:
I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment)
in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800
Adrian Robson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment)
in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single
definition. If I force some standard text between the two,
You can just put some ERT there, too. Even a LaTeX comment: %whatever.
It's true that there should be a better way.
Richard
Adrian Robson wrote:
> I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment)
> in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800
"Adrian Robson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment)
> in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single
> definition. If I force some standard text between the
