El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 8:51, Saša Janiška () escribió:
>
> Hello,
>
> just curious which engine do you recommend to be used with Lyx: LuaTeX
> or XeTeX?
>
As pointed out in this thread, *in principle* you can use both without
trouble... except when you can't. It's a know "issue" (it can be
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 03:31:15PM +0100, Herbert Voss via lyx-users wrote:
> >Could anyone of the better informed review https://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LuaTeX ?
> >Some of the claims (like LuaTeX is still in beta status) are unlikely to be
> >truth
> >and they can shape LyX users base in a wrong
And 20 seconds is a drama? Come on.
And my understanding is that you can pass parameters from the command
line to make, so this can become part of an automatable workflow.
el
On 2021-12-20 22:49 , Steve Litt via lyx-users wrote:
Dr Eberhard Lisse via lyx-users said on Mon, 20 Dec 2021
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:03:46AM -0500, Steve Litt via lyx-users wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak via lyx-users said on Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:55:24 -0500
>
> >On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 07:26:57AM -0500, Steve Litt via lyx-users
> >wrote:
> >> Scott Kostyshak via lyx-users said on Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:55:18
Scott Kostyshak via lyx-users said on Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:55:24 -0500
>On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 07:26:57AM -0500, Steve Litt via lyx-users
>wrote:
>> Scott Kostyshak via lyx-users said on Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:55:18 -0500
>>
>> >On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 03:49:33PM -0500, Steve Litt via lyx-users
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 07:26:57AM -0500, Steve Litt via lyx-users wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak via lyx-users said on Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:55:18 -0500
>
> >On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 03:49:33PM -0500, Steve Litt via lyx-users
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Because I
> >> personalize every book, I need to recompile
Scott Kostyshak via lyx-users said on Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:55:18 -0500
>On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 03:49:33PM -0500, Steve Litt via lyx-users
>wrote:
>
>> Because I
>> personalize every book, I need to recompile for every order, so I
>> might research using PDFTeX. Thanks for the tip.
>
>Does the
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 03:49:33PM -0500, Steve Litt via lyx-users wrote:
> Because I
> personalize every book, I need to recompile for every order, so I might
> research using PDFTeX. Thanks for the tip.
Does the personalization change every page or just a few?
Best,
Scott
signature.asc
Dr Eberhard Lisse via lyx-users said on Mon, 20 Dec 2021 08:49:24 +0200
>PDFLaTeX is much faster that LuaLaTeX but to be hoest, nowadays the
>day to day stuff is so fast anyway that that doesn't matter.
I noticed that my new book, which is much shorter than most, took about
triple the time,
Stve,
I like the Noto fonts, but my understanding is that all TeX Gyre
fonts also work under PDFLaTeX.
But, LUA is really cool.
You can put simple stuff into the preamble like
\usepackage{luacode}
\begin{luacode*}
socket = require "socket"
function
Am 17.12.21 um 20:20 schrieb Virgil Arrington:
*From: *Herbert Voss via lyx-users <mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
*Sent: *Friday, December 17, 2021 6:06 AM
*To: *lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
*Subject: *Re: LuaTeX vs XeTeX
Am 16.12.21 um 22:12 schrieb Virgil Arrington via lyx-users:
> &
Herbert Voss via lyx-users said on Thu, 16 Dec 2021 15:31:15 +0100
>- no more fiddling around with the encoding, everything is UTF-8
>- no more restrictions in using fonts, all current types are supported,
> like pfb, ttf, utf, ttc, ...
>- easy integration of the script language Lua into a
From: Herbert Voss via lyx-users<mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 6:06 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org<mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
Subject: Re: LuaTeX vs XeTeX
Am 16.12.21 um 22:12 schrieb Virgil Arrington via lyx-users:
> > Starting with th
Am 17.12.21 um 15:03 schrieb Neal Becker:
I thought all LaTeX have to pass strict tests and produce identical
results. Any difference due to different fonts. Is this correct?
no. It is correct only for TeX, the original one! run the example with
pdftex, xetex, and luatex
\hsize 1cm
I thought all LaTeX have to pass strict tests and produce identical
results. Any difference due to different fonts. Is this correct?
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 6:06 AM Herbert Voss via lyx-users
wrote:
>
> Am 16.12.21 um 22:12 schrieb Virgil Arrington via lyx-users:
> > Starting with the
Am 16.12.21 um 22:12 schrieb Virgil Arrington via lyx-users:
Starting with the completely clean files, I added the Microtype
package to both and compiled them. As with my first test, I got
different results. XeTeX once again produced many more hyphenated
lines -- essentially the same as it
On 12/16/2021 3:17 PM, Herbert Voss via lyx-users wrote:
Do _not_ load any font and choose an empty preanble,
then Computer Modern is used for pdflatex and Latin Modern
for lualatex/xelatex. And then you will see _no_ difference in
the created pdf.
I did as you said, and you are right; with
Am 16.12.21 um 21:02 schrieb Virgil Arrington via lyx-users:
On 12/16/2021 9:31 AM, Herbert Voss via lyx-users wrote:
LuaTeX ,and XeTeX too, are more or less frozen code, just like TeX.
Only bugs will be fixed. There are no good reasons _not_ to use
LuaTeX instead
of pdfTeX:
On 12/16/2021 9:31 AM, Herbert Voss via lyx-users wrote:
LuaTeX ,and XeTeX too, are more or less frozen code, just like TeX.
Only bugs will be fixed. There are no good reasons _not_ to use LuaTeX instead
of pdfTeX:
I just performed an interesting experiment comparing the results from compiling
Am 16.12.21 um 14:45 schrieb Pavel Sanda via lyx-users:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:49:29AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
Am 08.11.21 um 09:46 schrieb Saša Janiška:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:58:37 +0100
Herbert Voss wrote:
LuaHBTeX (HB for HarfBuzz) is the default engine for lualatex
Thank you
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:49:29AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Am 08.11.21 um 09:46 schrieb Saša Janiška:
> >On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:58:37 +0100
> >Herbert Voss wrote:
> >
> >
> >>LuaHBTeX (HB for HarfBuzz) is the default engine for lualatex
> >>
> >Thank you since I was not aware of it despite
That's from 2016, right?
On 2021-11-08 15:57 , Joel Kulesza wrote:
[...]
> I don't necessarily recommend one versus the other, but I usually use
> `pdflatex` unless I cannot, in which case I opt for `lualatex`. In
> those cases, my preference was somewhat informed by other
> Internet-based
Saša Janiška said on Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:51:26 +0100
>Hello,
>
>just curious which engine do you recommend to be used with Lyx: LuaTeX
>or XeTeX?
These days, I always opt for luatex and lualatex. They just always
work, and if they don't, I know enough Lua that I might be able to
strongarm things.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:50 AM Herbert Voss
wrote:
>
> Am 08.11.21 um 09:46 schrieb Saša Janiška:
> > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:58:37 +0100
> > Herbert Voss wrote:
> >
> >
> >> LuaHBTeX (HB for HarfBuzz) is the default engine for lualatex
> >>
> > Thank you since I was not aware of it despite it
Am 08.11.21 um 09:46 schrieb Saša Janiška:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:58:37 +0100
Herbert Voss wrote:
LuaHBTeX (HB for HarfBuzz) is the default engine for lualatex
Thank you since I was not aware of it despite it is being installed on
my Debian machine.
Otherwise, I was aware of LuaTeX
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:58:37 +0100
Herbert Voss wrote:
> LuaHBTeX (HB for HarfBuzz) is the default engine for lualatex
>
Thank you since I was not aware of it despite it is being installed on
my Debian machine.
Otherwise, I was aware of LuaTeX since I was considering to use ConTeXt
instead
Am 08.11.21 um 08:51 schrieb Saša Janiška:
just curious which engine do you recommend to be used with Lyx: LuaTeX
or XeTeX?
LuaHBTeX (HB for HarfBuzz) is the default engine for lualatex
Herbert
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
