Re: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Kornel Benko 
Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 10:09:37, schrieb Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On 11/06/12 09:40, Kornel Benko wrote:
  Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 04:21:13, schrieb Scott Kostyshak 
  skost...@princeton.edu
  
  I'm trying to fix a couple of bugs that others haven't been able to 
  replicate. Could you 
  please
  let me know if you observe the same behavior as I do?
  
  
  
  (1)
  
  in the edit menu when you see Find and Replace (quick) ... is the F 
  underlined? Or does 
  the
  underscore appear before the F ?
  
  
  
  before F if I set the User interface lanuage to English.
 
 Nope - can't confirm this for English - LyX 2.0.3 from ppa, Ubuntu Precise
 
 Rainer

Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.

Kornel

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Liviu Andronic 
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
  before F if I set the User interface lanuage to English.
 Nope - can't confirm this for English - LyX 2.0.3 from ppa, Ubuntu
 Precise
 Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.

I have fairly old branch and trunk snapshots, but I cannot confirm
this here. Perhaps this is related to the current locale? This is what
I have:
liv@liv-laptop:~$ locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC=en_US.UTF-8
LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8
LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NAME=en_US.UTF-8
LC_ADDRESS=en_US.UTF-8
LC_TELEPHONE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8
LC_IDENTIFICATION=en_US.UTF-8
LC_ALL=


Liviu

RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:19 AM

Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.


Does this mean that in 2.1.0svn the F is correctly underlined for you or that 
you are just not confirming for 2.1.0svn?


Thanks,


Scott

RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
From: Liviu Andronic [landronim...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:31 AM

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
  before F if I set the User interface lanuage to English.
 Nope - can't confirm this for English - LyX 2.0.3 from ppa, Ubuntu
 Precise
 Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.

I have fairly old branch and trunk snapshots, but I cannot confirm
this here. Perhaps this is related to the current locale? This is what
I have:
liv@liv-laptop:~$ locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC=en_US.UTF-8
LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8
LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NAME=en_US.UTF-8
LC_ADDRESS=en_US.UTF-8
LC_TELEPHONE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8
LC_IDENTIFICATION=en_US.UTF-8
LC_ALL=

I have the same locale output as you. If interested, here was the discussion on 
the lyx-dev list regarding a possible fix to this behavior:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg174086.html
Don't pay attention to my patch; JMarc's idea is clearly better, if indeed this 
is a problem to be fixed.

Scott

Re: RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Kornel Benko 
Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 11:03:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak 
skost...@princeton.edu
 From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
 Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:19 AM
 
 Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.
 
 
 Does this mean that in 2.1.0svn the F is correctly underlined for you or that 
 you are just not confirming for 2.1.0svn?
 

Sorry, it means
in 2.1.0svn ' ' before F *was* underlined,
in 2.0.4svn 'F' is underlined

In both cases the locale is the same, using kde-plasma desktop.
LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=de_DE:sk:en
LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_TIME=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_COLLATE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_MONETARY=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_MESSAGES=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_PAPER=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_NAME=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_ADDRESS=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_TELEPHONE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_MEASUREMENT=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_IDENTIFICATION=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_ALL=

This may not be important, me thinks.

The crazy thing now is: Without recompiling, now also in 2.1.0svn 'F' is 
underlined.
I cannot see the bad behaviour anymore.

What I have done in the meantime? I played with configure of the unity-desktop 
(with my login)
to be able to configure it correct later for my wife.


 Thanks,
 
 
 Scott

Kornel

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

RE: RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 7:44 AM

The crazy thing now is: Without recompiling, now also in 2.1.0svn 'F' is 
underlined.

This is indeed weird. It's not completely crazy because the menu item in this 
case is controlled by a text file, stdmenus.inc. If you modify that file then 
the changes will show up instantly (this is also an easy way to customize the 
menu to way you like it). What is strange is that you didn't modify that file.


 I cannot see the bad behaviour anymore. What I have done in the meantime? I 
 played with configure of the unity-desktop (with my login) to be able to 
 configure it correct later for my wife.

Strange. I don't know why this would have an effect. If you're able to 
reproduce the solution, please post back.

I still don't know if this is an Ubuntu issue, a Qt issue, or what.

Thanks for your help,

Scott

Re: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Kornel Benko 
Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 10:09:37, schrieb Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On 11/06/12 09:40, Kornel Benko wrote:
  Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 04:21:13, schrieb Scott Kostyshak 
  skost...@princeton.edu
  
  I'm trying to fix a couple of bugs that others haven't been able to 
  replicate. Could you 
  please
  let me know if you observe the same behavior as I do?
  
  
  
  (1)
  
  in the edit menu when you see Find and Replace (quick) ... is the F 
  underlined? Or does 
  the
  underscore appear before the F ?
  
  
  
  before F if I set the User interface lanuage to English.
 
 Nope - can't confirm this for English - LyX 2.0.3 from ppa, Ubuntu Precise
 
 Rainer

Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.

Kornel

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Liviu Andronic 
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
  before F if I set the User interface lanuage to English.
 Nope - can't confirm this for English - LyX 2.0.3 from ppa, Ubuntu
 Precise
 Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.

I have fairly old branch and trunk snapshots, but I cannot confirm
this here. Perhaps this is related to the current locale? This is what
I have:
liv@liv-laptop:~$ locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC=en_US.UTF-8
LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8
LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NAME=en_US.UTF-8
LC_ADDRESS=en_US.UTF-8
LC_TELEPHONE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8
LC_IDENTIFICATION=en_US.UTF-8
LC_ALL=


Liviu

RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:19 AM

Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.


Does this mean that in 2.1.0svn the F is correctly underlined for you or that 
you are just not confirming for 2.1.0svn?


Thanks,


Scott

RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
From: Liviu Andronic [landronim...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:31 AM

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
  before F if I set the User interface lanuage to English.
 Nope - can't confirm this for English - LyX 2.0.3 from ppa, Ubuntu
 Precise
 Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.

I have fairly old branch and trunk snapshots, but I cannot confirm
this here. Perhaps this is related to the current locale? This is what
I have:
liv@liv-laptop:~$ locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC=en_US.UTF-8
LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8
LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NAME=en_US.UTF-8
LC_ADDRESS=en_US.UTF-8
LC_TELEPHONE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8
LC_IDENTIFICATION=en_US.UTF-8
LC_ALL=

I have the same locale output as you. If interested, here was the discussion on 
the lyx-dev list regarding a possible fix to this behavior:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg174086.html
Don't pay attention to my patch; JMarc's idea is clearly better, if indeed this 
is a problem to be fixed.

Scott

Re: RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Kornel Benko 
Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 11:03:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak 
skost...@princeton.edu
 From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
 Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:19 AM
 
 Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.
 
 
 Does this mean that in 2.1.0svn the F is correctly underlined for you or that 
 you are just not confirming for 2.1.0svn?
 

Sorry, it means
in 2.1.0svn ' ' before F *was* underlined,
in 2.0.4svn 'F' is underlined

In both cases the locale is the same, using kde-plasma desktop.
LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=de_DE:sk:en
LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_TIME=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_COLLATE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_MONETARY=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_MESSAGES=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_PAPER=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_NAME=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_ADDRESS=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_TELEPHONE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_MEASUREMENT=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_IDENTIFICATION=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_ALL=

This may not be important, me thinks.

The crazy thing now is: Without recompiling, now also in 2.1.0svn 'F' is 
underlined.
I cannot see the bad behaviour anymore.

What I have done in the meantime? I played with configure of the unity-desktop 
(with my login)
to be able to configure it correct later for my wife.


 Thanks,
 
 
 Scott

Kornel

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

RE: RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 7:44 AM

The crazy thing now is: Without recompiling, now also in 2.1.0svn 'F' is 
underlined.

This is indeed weird. It's not completely crazy because the menu item in this 
case is controlled by a text file, stdmenus.inc. If you modify that file then 
the changes will show up instantly (this is also an easy way to customize the 
menu to way you like it). What is strange is that you didn't modify that file.


 I cannot see the bad behaviour anymore. What I have done in the meantime? I 
 played with configure of the unity-desktop (with my login) to be able to 
 configure it correct later for my wife.

Strange. I don't know why this would have an effect. If you're able to 
reproduce the solution, please post back.

I still don't know if this is an Ubuntu issue, a Qt issue, or what.

Thanks for your help,

Scott

Re: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Kornel Benko 
Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 10:09:37, schrieb Rainer M Krug 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 11/06/12 09:40, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 04:21:13, schrieb Scott Kostyshak 
> > 
> > 
> >> I'm trying to fix a couple of bugs that others haven't been able to 
> >> replicate. Could you 
> >> please
> > let me know if you observe the same behavior as I do?
> > 
> >> 
> > 
> >> (1)
> > 
> >> in the edit menu when you see "Find and Replace (quick) ..." is the "F" 
> >> underlined? Or does 
> >> the
> > underscore appear before the "F" ?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > before F if I set the User interface lanuage to "English".
> 
> Nope - can't confirm this for "English" - LyX 2.0.3 from ppa, Ubuntu Precise
> 
> Rainer

Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.

Kornel

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Liviu Andronic 
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Kornel Benko  wrote:
>> > before F if I set the User interface lanuage to "English".
>> Nope - can't confirm this for "English" - LyX 2.0.3 from ppa, Ubuntu
>> Precise
> Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.
>
I have fairly old branch and trunk snapshots, but I cannot confirm
this here. Perhaps this is related to the current locale? This is what
I have:
liv@liv-laptop:~$ locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ALL=


Liviu

RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:19 AM

>Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.


Does this mean that in 2.1.0svn the F is correctly underlined for you or that 
you are just not confirming for 2.1.0svn?


Thanks,


Scott

RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
From: Liviu Andronic [landronim...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:31 AM

>On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Kornel Benko  wrote:
>>> > before F if I set the User interface lanuage to "English".
>>> Nope - can't confirm this for "English" - LyX 2.0.3 from ppa, Ubuntu
>>> Precise
>> Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.
>>
>I have fairly old branch and trunk snapshots, but I cannot confirm
>this here. Perhaps this is related to the current locale? This is what
>I have:
>liv@liv-laptop:~$ locale
>LANG=en_US.UTF-8
>LANGUAGE=
>LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8"
>LC_ALL=

I have the same locale output as you. If interested, here was the discussion on 
the lyx-dev list regarding a possible fix to this behavior:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg174086.html
Don't pay attention to my patch; JMarc's idea is clearly better, if indeed this 
is a problem to be fixed.

Scott

Re: RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Kornel Benko 
Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 11:03:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak 

> From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:19 AM
> 
> >Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.
> 
> 
> Does this mean that in 2.1.0svn the F is correctly underlined for you or that 
> you are just not confirming for 2.1.0svn?
> 

Sorry, it means
in 2.1.0svn ' ' before F *was* underlined,
in 2.0.4svn 'F' is underlined

In both cases the locale is the same, using kde-plasma desktop.
LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=de_DE:sk:en
LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_MONETARY="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_PAPER="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_ADDRESS="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_TELEPHONE="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_MEASUREMENT="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_ALL=

This may not be important, me thinks.

The crazy thing now is: Without recompiling, now also in 2.1.0svn 'F' is 
underlined.
I cannot see the bad behaviour anymore.

What I have done in the meantime? I played with configure of the unity-desktop 
(with my login)
to be able to configure it correct later for my wife.


> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Scott

Kornel

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

RE: RE: Re: Ubuntu users -- can you replicate this?

2012-06-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak 
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 7:44 AM

>The crazy thing now is: Without recompiling, now also in 2.1.0svn 'F' is 
>underlined.

This is indeed weird. It's not completely crazy because the menu item in this 
case is controlled by a text file, stdmenus.inc. If you modify that file then 
the changes will show up instantly (this is also an easy way to customize the 
menu to way you like it). What is strange is that you didn't modify that file.


> I cannot see the bad behaviour anymore. >What I have done in the meantime? I 
> played with configure of the unity-desktop (with my login) to be >able to 
> configure it correct later for my wife.

Strange. I don't know why this would have an effect. If you're able to 
reproduce the solution, please post back.

I still don't know if this is an Ubuntu issue, a Qt issue, or what.

Thanks for your help,

Scott