-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Rudi :
Don't work. I have installed it, without error, but don't start.
I have make the command lyx -dbg 2 and that is the log :
lyxrc.dist Not found
Preferences Not found
Encodings Not found
Languages Not found
Reading layouts ...
here stop.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When installed libqt3-devel, have more dependences : libmng-devel,
liblcms-devel, libadudio-devel and so, and so .. to
infinite. I have download and installed some packages and say me :
failed dependences : need libmng-devel,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Rudi :
Don't work. I have installed it, without error, but don't start.
I have make the command lyx -dbg 2 and that is the log :
lyxrc.dist Not found
Preferences Not found
Encodings Not found
Languages Not found
Reading layouts ...
here stop.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When installed libqt3-devel, have more dependences : libmng-devel,
liblcms-devel, libadudio-devel and so, and so .. to
infinite. I have download and installed some packages and say me :
failed dependences : need libmng-devel,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Rudi :
Don't work. I have installed it, without error, but don't start.
I have make the command lyx -dbg 2 and that is the log :
lyxrc.dist Not found
Preferences Not found
Encodings Not found
Languages Not found
Reading layouts ...
here stop.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When installed libqt3-devel, have more dependences : libmng-devel,
liblcms-devel, libadudio-devel and so, and so .. to
infinite. I have download and installed some packages and say me :
failed dependences : need libmng-devel,
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the man
page, I noticed that you can include extra requirements to the
final rpm package, but I
Hi, Jean-Marc.
I created a new rpm from Georg's intructions. Its name is:
lyx-1.4.3-1_qt_mdv2006.i586.rpm
I uploaded it to ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming. The ftp client reported a
successful transfer, but I could not get the directory listing to confirm.
Could you please verify for me?
Rudi == Rudi Gaelzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rudi Hi, Jean-Marc. I created a new rpm from Georg's intructions. Its
Rudi name is: lyx-1.4.3-1_qt_mdv2006.i586.rpm
Very good.
Rudi I uploaded it to ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming. The ftp client
Rudi reported a successful transfer, but I could
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the man
page, I noticed that you can include extra requirements to the
final rpm package, but I
Hi, Jean-Marc.
I created a new rpm from Georg's intructions. Its name is:
lyx-1.4.3-1_qt_mdv2006.i586.rpm
I uploaded it to ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming. The ftp client reported a
successful transfer, but I could not get the directory listing to confirm.
Could you please verify for me?
Rudi == Rudi Gaelzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rudi Hi, Jean-Marc. I created a new rpm from Georg's intructions. Its
Rudi name is: lyx-1.4.3-1_qt_mdv2006.i586.rpm
Very good.
Rudi I uploaded it to ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming. The ftp client
Rudi reported a successful transfer, but I could
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
>> I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
>> instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the man
>> page, I noticed that you can include extra requirements to the
>> final
Hi, Jean-Marc.
I created a new rpm from Georg's intructions. Its name is:
lyx-1.4.3-1_qt_mdv2006.i586.rpm
I uploaded it to ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming. The ftp client reported a
successful transfer, but I could not get the directory listing to confirm.
Could you please verify for me?
> "Rudi" == Rudi Gaelzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rudi> Hi, Jean-Marc. I created a new rpm from Georg's intructions. Its
Rudi> name is: lyx-1.4.3-1_qt_mdv2006.i586.rpm
Very good.
Rudi> I uploaded it to ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming. The ftp client
Rudi> reported a successful transfer,
Hi, Christian.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so we'll keep the page. I didn't quite understand if you wanted to
keep the name of the page, or thought it was ok to rename it to 'LyX on
RPM-based Linux'? (Or if you have another suggestion for the name of the
Thanks, Georg.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 12:15, Georg Baum wrote:
If your package was built from clean sources and it is useful for a wider
audience, i.e. it does not require anything that is not part of your
distro, then it would be a good idea to put it on the LyX ftp server. If
you want
Rudi == Rudi Gaelzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rudi I think it's safe to say that the answers to both your questions
Rudi is yes.
Rudi I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
Rudi instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the
Rudi man page, I noticed
On Thursday 12 October 2006 11:51, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Rudi == Rudi Gaelzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does the LE stand for? Only 2005 was a LE version (because they
rushed it out, IIRC).
Really? I didn't pay attention to that... My bad, sorry... perhaps you should
remove LE
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the man page,
I noticed that you can include extra requirements to the final rpm
package, but
I did not do that. Here's the list from:
I did not
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Hi, Christian.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so we'll keep the page. I didn't quite understand if you wanted to
keep the name of the page, or thought it was ok to rename it to 'LyX on
RPM-based Linux'? (Or if you
On Thursday 12 October 2006 12:05, Georg Baum wrote:
I did not know that you used checkinstall. I just corrected the wiki page,
because checkinstall builds suboptimal packages. They should not be
distributed IMHO. If you use the rpm spec file that is inside the source
archive then you get
Hi, Christian.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so we'll keep the page. I didn't quite understand if you wanted to
keep the name of the page, or thought it was ok to rename it to 'LyX on
RPM-based Linux'? (Or if you have another suggestion for the name of the
Thanks, Georg.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 12:15, Georg Baum wrote:
If your package was built from clean sources and it is useful for a wider
audience, i.e. it does not require anything that is not part of your
distro, then it would be a good idea to put it on the LyX ftp server. If
you want
Rudi == Rudi Gaelzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rudi I think it's safe to say that the answers to both your questions
Rudi is yes.
Rudi I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
Rudi instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the
Rudi man page, I noticed
On Thursday 12 October 2006 11:51, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Rudi == Rudi Gaelzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does the LE stand for? Only 2005 was a LE version (because they
rushed it out, IIRC).
Really? I didn't pay attention to that... My bad, sorry... perhaps you should
remove LE
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the man page,
I noticed that you can include extra requirements to the final rpm
package, but
I did not do that. Here's the list from:
I did not
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Hi, Christian.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so we'll keep the page. I didn't quite understand if you wanted to
keep the name of the page, or thought it was ok to rename it to 'LyX on
RPM-based Linux'? (Or if you
On Thursday 12 October 2006 12:05, Georg Baum wrote:
I did not know that you used checkinstall. I just corrected the wiki page,
because checkinstall builds suboptimal packages. They should not be
distributed IMHO. If you use the rpm spec file that is inside the source
archive then you get
Hi, Christian.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, so we'll keep the page. I didn't quite understand if you wanted to
> keep the name of the page, or thought it was ok to rename it to 'LyX on
> RPM-based Linux'? (Or if you have another suggestion for the name of the
Thanks, Georg.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 12:15, Georg Baum wrote:
> If your package was built from clean sources and it is useful for a wider
> audience, i.e. it does not require anything that is not part of your
> distro, then it would be a good idea to put it on the LyX ftp server. If
> you
> "Rudi" == Rudi Gaelzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rudi> I think it's safe to say that the answers to both your questions
Rudi> is yes.
Rudi> I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
Rudi> instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the
Rudi> man
On Thursday 12 October 2006 11:51, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Rudi" == Rudi Gaelzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What does the LE stand for? Only 2005 was a LE version (because they
> rushed it out, IIRC).
Really? I didn't pay attention to that... My bad, sorry... perhaps you should
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
> instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the man page,
> I noticed that you can include extra requirements to the final rpm
> package, but
> I did not do that. Here's the list from:
I
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Hi, Christian.
> On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ok, so we'll keep the page. I didn't quite understand if you wanted to
> > keep the name of the page, or thought it was ok to rename it to 'LyX on
> > RPM-based Linux'?
On Thursday 12 October 2006 12:05, Georg Baum wrote:
> I did not know that you used checkinstall. I just corrected the wiki page,
> because checkinstall builds suboptimal packages. They should not be
> distributed IMHO. If you use the rpm spec file that is inside the source
> archive then you get
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might have created the page based on Paul's post. The page should
probably say that LyX is in Fedora Extras (whatever that is).
Is there a point to having a page describing how to create LyX RPM? If so,
maybe the page could be
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Anyway, I got at least one person interested in my package. Is there any
possibility that I can upload it to an official mirror? I don't have any
public repository quota available to me, right now...
If your package was built from clean sources and it is useful for a wider
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might have created the page based on Paul's post. The page should
probably say that LyX is in Fedora Extras (whatever that is).
Is there a point to having a page describing how to
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might have created the page based on Paul's post. The page should
probably say that LyX is in Fedora Extras (whatever that is).
Is there a point to having a page describing how to create LyX RPM? If so,
maybe the page could be
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Anyway, I got at least one person interested in my package. Is there any
possibility that I can upload it to an official mirror? I don't have any
public repository quota available to me, right now...
If your package was built from clean sources and it is useful for a wider
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might have created the page based on Paul's post. The page should
probably say that LyX is in Fedora Extras (whatever that is).
Is there a point to having a page describing how to
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I might have created the page based on Paul's post. The page should
> probably say that LyX is in Fedora Extras (whatever that is).
>
> Is there a point to having a page describing how to create LyX RPM? If so,
> maybe the page could
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Anyway, I got at least one person interested in my package. Is there any
> possibility that I can upload it to an official mirror? I don't have any
> public repository quota available to me, right now...
If your package was built from clean sources and it is useful for a
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I might have created the page based on Paul's post. The page should
> > probably say that LyX is in Fedora Extras (whatever that is).
> >
> > Is there a point to having a page describing
Hi.
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006. I
followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
It is not a terribly well-organized rpm package, but it looks like it
installed in my
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in Fedora Extras (and has been for some time), is
On 10/10/06, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in Fedora Extras (and has
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Paul Smith wrote:
On 10/10/06, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
On 10/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in
Is there a point to having a page describing how to create LyX RPM? If so,
maybe the page could be called 'LyX on RPM-based Linux'?
+1 as official Mandriva also has rpm packages for Lyx, Mandriva 2006 is
just offering a little bit older 1.3x version.
Hi.
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006. I
followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
It is not a terribly well-organized rpm package, but it looks like it
installed in my
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in Fedora Extras (and has been for some time), is
On 10/10/06, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in Fedora Extras (and has
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Paul Smith wrote:
On 10/10/06, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
On 10/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in
Is there a point to having a page describing how to create LyX RPM? If so,
maybe the page could be called 'LyX on RPM-based Linux'?
+1 as official Mandriva also has rpm packages for Lyx, Mandriva 2006 is
just offering a little bit older 1.3x version.
Hi.
I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006. I
followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
Ridderström in:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
It is not a terribly well-organized rpm package, but it looks like it
installed in my
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
> I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
> Ridderström in:
>
> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in Fedora Extras (and has been for some time), is
On 10/10/06, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
> I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
> Ridderström in:
>
> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in Fedora Extras
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Paul Smith wrote:
> On 10/10/06, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
> > > I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
> > > Ridderström in:
> > >
> > >
On 10/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
> > > I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
> > > Ridderström in:
> > >
> > > http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
> >
> >
> Is there a point to having a page describing how to create LyX RPM? If so,
> maybe the page could be called 'LyX on RPM-based Linux'?
>
>
+1 as official Mandriva also has rpm packages for Lyx, Mandriva 2006 is
just offering a little bit older 1.3x version.
63 matches
Mail list logo
