Ken,
Sounds like you're on to something fairly promising! If there's any
assistance you think you might need (hunting for technical info on the NEC
side, perhaps), I have quite a bit of resources at my disposal.
Good luck sir!
Gary
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Ken Pettit
From: Gary Weber
To: m...@bitchin100.com
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [M100] CP/M Expander
Ken,
While the NEC "All Ram" mode is as easy as copying whatever contents you want
into "Bank2 RAM" and flipping a few bits on an OUT port to MAP
Hey Gary,
Actually, thinking about it, even generating the WR signal shouldn't be
an issue. I could just detect CE active with no RD at the proper
location. This would be really easy.
Trying to decode the opcodes to generate WR is complicated by the fact
that the opcodes produce varying
Hi Gary,
This should be manageable still using only the RD and CE signals.
Without the ALE, it is a bit more work to track the bus activity, but
not impossible. If the Woolly board has an FPGA on it, then it would
certainly be no issue. But I'm investigating if I can use a Xilinx
Are there docs about exactly what port writes were necessary for the bank
switching? I don't have one just curious about the architecture.
S
Sent from your iPhone.
> On Jul 26, 2017, at 6:35 PM, Gary Weber wrote:
>
> Ken,
>
> While the NEC "All Ram" mode is as easy as
> On Jul 24, 2017, at 10:03, Ken Pettit wrote:
>
> I was looking at using the ATWINC1500 module. This is WiFi only and no
> Bluetooth. The module is *just* small enough that it can fit on a PCB within
> the OptROM socket, provided it is a stacked PCB on top of the main
Hi Mark,
I looked at the ESP32 and ESP8266. The problem is that the modules are
too big for the OptROM socket. And trying to use just the chip vs.
using a module, it requires adding external components for RF and then
getting FCC testing done (10's of thousands of dollars). With a module,
I'm late to this thread because I tend to let my Bitchin100 folder sit ignored
for long periods while my fickle obsessions shift to my other machines and
hobbies. Boy, was this thread a pleasant surprise when I decided it's time to
clear out old unread messages!
The board that Ken is
Mike I meant. Well Ken too.
On Jul 12, 2017 9:37 AM, "Brian White" wrote:
> Ken was refering to the names of the things. nads is slang for gonads.
>
> On Jul 11, 2017 11:21 PM, "Flow gmail" wrote:
>
> No, Ken. That's something else. But, then,
Oh. For a moment, I thought they referred to Hillary's elegy, "If I'd had
them, I'd be King."
論
Gene Corrigan
flowcharles...@gmail.com
>>>175 Market Street, 407<<<
Charleston SC 29401
+843.870.3235
> On Jul 12, 2017, at 9:37 AM, Brian White wrote:
>
> Ken was refering to
Right, and I came up with the name Woolly because a module like that
inside the M100 would pretty much be a Mammoth, which is of course
pre-historic, much like the Model T laptops.
Ken
On 7/12/17 6:37 AM, Brian White wrote:
Ken was refering to the names of the things. nads is slang for
Ken was refering to the names of the things. nads is slang for gonads.
On Jul 11, 2017 11:21 PM, "Flow gmail" wrote:
No, Ken. That's something else. But, then, you guys do get a little mired
in miniature rapture, hey?
Gene Corrigan
flowcharles...@gmail.com
>>>175
No, Ken. That's something else. But, then, you guys do get a little mired in
miniature rapture, hey?
Gene Corrigan
flowcharles...@gmail.com
>>>175 Market Street, 407<<<
Charleston SC 29401
+843.870.3235
> On Jul 11, 2017, at 9:09 PM, Ken Pettit wrote:
>
> My Initial
My Initial thought was that it is kinda like a Super REX, so it should
be called SEX. But then I thought "no". :)
Ken
On 7/11/17 5:29 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:58 PM Ken Pettit > wrote:
Oh, and the name I
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:58 PM Ken Pettit wrote:
> Oh, and the name I gave to this design is "Woolly". It would be the
> Woolly board. :)
>
>
> Ken
>
Wooly bully
Oh, and the name I gave to this design is "Woolly". It would be the
Woolly board. :)
Ken
On 7/11/17 4:39 PM, Ken Pettit wrote:
Hi Philip,
It is possible. No wires needed, just plug in the module. I
developed a board for a client that has this much functionality on it
and it is small
Hi Philip,
It is possible. No wires needed, just plug in the module. I developed
a board for a client that has this much functionality on it and it is
small enough that the user wears it under their foot (along with a big
battery and charger coil). The solution I am thinking about would
Great Ken.
Changing thread to "CP/M Expander"
Is it really possible to fit all that on OptROM form factor? Would it
need a heap of wires soldered to motherboard?
Philip
On 12/07/2017 7:14 AM, Ken Pettit wrote:
Downloaded the remem.bin file and ran CP/M under VT 1.7 on Linux.
Works great!
18 matches
Mail list logo