Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-27 Thread Gary Weber
Ken, Sounds like you're on to something fairly promising! If there's any assistance you think you might need (hunting for technical info on the NEC side, perhaps), I have quite a bit of resources at my disposal. Good luck sir! Gary On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Ken Pettit

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-26 Thread Philip Avery
From: Gary Weber To: m...@bitchin100.com Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 10:35 AM Subject: Re: [M100] CP/M Expander Ken, While the NEC "All Ram" mode is as easy as copying whatever contents you want into "Bank2 RAM" and flipping a few bits on an OUT port to MAP

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-26 Thread Ken Pettit
Hey Gary, Actually, thinking about it, even generating the WR signal shouldn't be an issue. I could just detect CE active with no RD at the proper location. This would be really easy. Trying to decode the opcodes to generate WR is complicated by the fact that the opcodes produce varying

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-26 Thread Ken Pettit
Hi Gary, This should be manageable still using only the RD and CE signals. Without the ALE, it is a bit more work to track the bus activity, but not impossible. If the Woolly board has an FPGA on it, then it would certainly be no issue. But I'm investigating if I can use a Xilinx

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-26 Thread Scott Lawrence
Are there docs about exactly what port writes were necessary for the bank switching? I don't have one just curious about the architecture. S Sent from your iPhone. > On Jul 26, 2017, at 6:35 PM, Gary Weber wrote: > > Ken, > > While the NEC "All Ram" mode is as easy as

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-24 Thread Mark J. Blair
> On Jul 24, 2017, at 10:03, Ken Pettit wrote: > > I was looking at using the ATWINC1500 module. This is WiFi only and no > Bluetooth. The module is *just* small enough that it can fit on a PCB within > the OptROM socket, provided it is a stacked PCB on top of the main

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-24 Thread Ken Pettit
Hi Mark, I looked at the ESP32 and ESP8266. The problem is that the modules are too big for the OptROM socket. And trying to use just the chip vs. using a module, it requires adding external components for RF and then getting FCC testing done (10's of thousands of dollars). With a module,

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-24 Thread Mark J. Blair
I'm late to this thread because I tend to let my Bitchin100 folder sit ignored for long periods while my fickle obsessions shift to my other machines and hobbies. Boy, was this thread a pleasant surprise when I decided it's time to clear out old unread messages! The board that Ken is

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-12 Thread Brian White
Mike I meant. Well Ken too. On Jul 12, 2017 9:37 AM, "Brian White" wrote: > Ken was refering to the names of the things. nads is slang for gonads. > > On Jul 11, 2017 11:21 PM, "Flow gmail" wrote: > > No, Ken. That's something else. But, then,

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-12 Thread Flow gmail
Oh. For a moment, I thought they referred to Hillary's elegy, "If I'd had them, I'd be King." 論 Gene Corrigan flowcharles...@gmail.com >>>175 Market Street, 407<<< Charleston SC 29401 +843.870.3235 > On Jul 12, 2017, at 9:37 AM, Brian White wrote: > > Ken was refering to

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-12 Thread Ken Pettit
Right, and I came up with the name Woolly because a module like that inside the M100 would pretty much be a Mammoth, which is of course pre-historic, much like the Model T laptops. Ken On 7/12/17 6:37 AM, Brian White wrote: Ken was refering to the names of the things. nads is slang for

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-12 Thread Brian White
Ken was refering to the names of the things. nads is slang for gonads. On Jul 11, 2017 11:21 PM, "Flow gmail" wrote: No, Ken. That's something else. But, then, you guys do get a little mired in miniature rapture, hey? Gene Corrigan flowcharles...@gmail.com >>>175

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-11 Thread Flow gmail
No, Ken. That's something else. But, then, you guys do get a little mired in miniature rapture, hey? Gene Corrigan flowcharles...@gmail.com >>>175 Market Street, 407<<< Charleston SC 29401 +843.870.3235 > On Jul 11, 2017, at 9:09 PM, Ken Pettit wrote: > > My Initial

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-11 Thread Ken Pettit
My Initial thought was that it is kinda like a Super REX, so it should be called SEX. But then I thought "no". :) Ken On 7/11/17 5:29 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:58 PM Ken Pettit > wrote: Oh, and the name I

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-11 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:58 PM Ken Pettit wrote: > Oh, and the name I gave to this design is "Woolly". It would be the > Woolly board. :) > > > Ken > Wooly bully

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-11 Thread Ken Pettit
Oh, and the name I gave to this design is "Woolly". It would be the Woolly board. :) Ken On 7/11/17 4:39 PM, Ken Pettit wrote: Hi Philip, It is possible. No wires needed, just plug in the module. I developed a board for a client that has this much functionality on it and it is small

Re: [M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-11 Thread Ken Pettit
Hi Philip, It is possible. No wires needed, just plug in the module. I developed a board for a client that has this much functionality on it and it is small enough that the user wears it under their foot (along with a big battery and charger coil). The solution I am thinking about would

[M100] CP/M Expander

2017-07-11 Thread Philip Avery
Great Ken. Changing thread to "CP/M Expander" Is it really possible to fit all that on OptROM form factor? Would it need a heap of wires soldered to motherboard? Philip On 12/07/2017 7:14 AM, Ken Pettit wrote: Downloaded the remem.bin file and ran CP/M under VT 1.7 on Linux. Works great!