Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Thanks! On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:34 AM Gregory McGill wrote: > Sorry wrong link > https://discord.gg/zauSrYSR3E is it > > On Wed, May 4, 2022, 8:28 AM Gregory McGill > wrote: > >> Yes the discord is here https://discord.gg/5yNTCDG >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2022, 8:11 AM Mike Stein wrote: >> >>>

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

" some people apparently have the opinion that you shouldn't respond unless you have a specific, substantive thing to say" Yeah I hope that's not where we're at. There's a balance somewhere. When someone asks a question and I don't have an answer or know where to look for it I don't usually

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Sorry wrong link https://discord.gg/zauSrYSR3E is it On Wed, May 4, 2022, 8:28 AM Gregory McGill wrote: > Yes the discord is here https://discord.gg/5yNTCDG > > On Wed, May 4, 2022, 8:11 AM Mike Stein wrote: > >> There's a Discord channel? >> >> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 2:23 PM Gregory McGill

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Yes the discord is here https://discord.gg/5yNTCDG On Wed, May 4, 2022, 8:11 AM Mike Stein wrote: > There's a Discord channel? > > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 2:23 PM Gregory McGill > wrote: > >> A good way to tell is the discord email list channel, it has 99% of the >> messages except the ones

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Not speaking to your specific concern... but some people apparently have the opinion that you shouldn't respond unless you have a specific, substantive thing to say. I've seen people on this very list get mad & quit over "unnecessary" traffic, messages not being snipped, etc. On Tue, May 3, 2022

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

There's a Discord channel? On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 2:23 PM Gregory McGill wrote: > A good way to tell is the discord email list channel, it has 99% of the > messages except the ones that exceed 2000 characters.. those are skipped > due to limitations on the importer > Greg >

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

I didn't see either one. I can only say I have only tried to use mcomm for windows to test it's bootstrapper to document how to use it and to verify what it can or can't do (like can you supply an arbitrary payload, and if not what exactly is built in) and I couldn't get it to work. It runs, but

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:17 PM Daryn Hanright wrote: > Looks like you didn't break the list John! > Don't worry I'll get there

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Through. Sent from my iPad > On May 3, 2022, at 6:22 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: > >  > I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. > If this message gets through please respond. > thanks > Steve

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Vollan To: m...@bitchin100.com Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2022 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [M100] is the list actually working? I'd appreciate if someone could respond to my messages just so I know they got through. I have posted about the weird error I am getting with Kurt McCullum's Mcomm twice

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

On 4/5/22 11:18, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: So I tried adding Host: lists.bitchin100.com Type: TXT Value: v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all It accepted

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

it got through On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 5:53 PM Peter Vollan wrote: > I'd appreciate if someone could respond to my messages just so I know they > got through. I have posted about the weird error I am getting with Kurt > McCullum's Mcomm twice without a peep, and I don't want to bore people to >

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

On bitchin100.com I have one TXT record Host: @ Type: TXT Value: v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include: relay.mailchannels.net -all I have a lists type A record under bitchin100.com which is the IP address. So I tried adding Host: lists.bitchin100.com Type: TXT Value: v=spf1 mx

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

yes On Tue, May 3, 2022, 8:53 PM Peter Vollan wrote: > I'd appreciate if someone could respond to my messages just so I know they > got through. I have posted about the weird error I am getting with Kurt > McCullum's Mcomm twice without a peep, and I don't want to bore people to > death if they

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

I think only one other person actually cc'd Steve in on the reply. If he's having list problems, replying only to the list *probably* isn't going to help. --dt On 4/5/22 07:43, Alastair Wiggins wrote: Received loud and clear here in Australia! Alastair Wiggins

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

There's still the SPF record fix to try: John, tl;dr - copy the SPF TXT record from bitchin100.com to lists.bitchin100.com. Completely unsure if this resolves Google's issue or not, but it will improve the SPF side of things. On 4/5/22 02:00, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: If anyone has a

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Received loud and clear here in Australia! Alastair Wiggins

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 11:55 AM Peter Vollan wrote: > I'd appreciate if someone could respond to my messages just so I know they > got through. I have posted about the weird error I am getting with Kurt > McCullum's Mcomm twice without a peep, and I don't want to bore people to > death if they

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

A good way to tell is the discord email list channel, it has 99% of the messages except the ones that exceed 2000 characters.. those are skipped due to limitations on the importer Greg

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

> On May 3, 2022, at 10:02 AM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > You say "messages will look a little different from these users." > Can you talk more about that? Are you talking about mail service software or > people reading the list? End users (us!) will see messages from the list with a From:

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

You say "messages will look a little different from these users." Can you talk more about that? Are you talking about mail service software or people reading the list? If you think there are any likely side effects to the suggested fixes, pluses and minuses it would be helpful to hear them.

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

> On May 3, 2022, at 9:30 AM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > If anyone has a suggestion that I can try in Mailman I'll try it. Hi John, In my own opinion the safest thing to do is to sigh and implement one of mailman's two header munging policies: Option A is: set dmarc_mitigate_action to

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 12:38 PM John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > > If anyone has a suggestion that I can try in Mailman I'll try it. On the mailman server I used to manage, I had to bite the bullet and enable munge_from https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC -Josh

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

If anyone has a suggestion that I can try in Mailman I'll try it. For what it's worth I think emails are coming through. Seems like some are getting delayed or bouncing for some users. But I haven't personally noticed any gaps in the discussions. -- John. >

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

> On May 3, 2022, at 8:20 AM, Cedric Amand wrote: > > By implementing DMARC records, you know who's trying to send mail "on your > behalf" and I noticed that in the DMARC reports, this mailing list's server > was one of them. This is true for users who control their domain and can manage mail

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Zero percent degredation. From: M100 on behalf of Lloyd Johnson Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 3:57 PM To: m...@bitchin100.com Subject: Re: [M100] is the list actually working? Received by me. From: M100 On Behalf Of Stephen Adolph Sent: Tuesday, May 03

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Received by me. From: M100 On Behalf Of Stephen Adolph Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2022 8:23 AM To: m...@bitchin100.com Subject: [M100] is the list actually working? I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. If this message gets through please respond.

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Exactly, Actually DMARC just let's you know what SPF records would already do on their own, but silently. By implementing DMARC records, you know who's trying to send mail "on your behalf" and I noticed that in the DMARC reports, this mailing list's server was one of them. In my case, SPF

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

> On May 3, 2022, at 7:09 AM, Cedric Amand wrote: > I did not investigate this much ; but I would look at the DMARC and « from » > problems DMARC is definitely one -- potentially the main -- issue here. If someone with a strict DMARC record submits a message to the list for broadcast, many

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Ok Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 3 mei 2022 om 15:40 heeft Brad Grier het volgende > geschreven: > >  > Got it. > >> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:24 AM incoming wrote: >> received >> >> > On May 3, 2022, at 8:22 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: >> > >> > I find myself wondering if the mailing

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

There are multiple things that seem to be weird with the mailing list ; I for example receive DMARC complaints that your domain is sending email with a « from » of my domain ; which is nowadays asking for problems The « reply « field is also weird with multiple times the mailing list name in it

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

5 x 5 From: M100 On Behalf Of Stephen Adolph Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2022 9:23 AM To: m...@bitchin100.com Subject: [M100] is the list actually working? I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. If this message gets through please respond. thanks Steve

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Yep. Got it. I'm using Fastmail, not Gmail. george g. On Tue, May 3, 2022, at 6:22 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: > I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. > If this message gets through please respond. > thanks > Steve

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Got it. On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:24 AM incoming wrote: > received > > > On May 3, 2022, at 8:22 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: > > > > I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very > unreliable. > > If this message gets through please respond. > > thanks > > Steve > > -- --

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

received > On May 3, 2022, at 8:22 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: > > I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. > If this message gets through please respond. > thanks > Steve

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Yep, the list is working and at least I seem to get all of the messages normally (but then again I'm not using Gmail). - kim -- Original Message -- From: "Stephen Adolph" To: m...@bitchin100.com Sent: Tue, 03 May 16:22:32 Subject: [M100] is the list actually working? I find myself