27;m very frustrated by the lack of
documentation for BeagleBone specific code that has been
added to machinekit. I will continue trying to figure this out,
but I'm going to hit send in that hopes that someone can
help.
--
John Kasunich
jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
--
website: http://www.machin
uot; a bunch of times, or going back to the
original link. I suppose I should have clicked "open in new
tab" when I wanted to edit the page.
Having made it back to the original page, I find that my
edit isn't there...
Git and github might be good for programmers who need to
ca
Well I was hoping not to clutter the thread with debugging,
but sometimes it happens.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016, at 05:54 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
> Trying it resulted in an insmod failure, and what seems
> to be two more errors during the cleanup process:
I started halcmd in a terminal
sentially useless, but still listed in the man page.
Yet another case of programming without documenting.
If the BBG + LCD wasn't such a nice little platform this is the
point where I'd throw up my hands in frustration and go back
to LinuxCNC...
--
John Kasunich
jmk
-15-4gb.img.xz
downloaded from this location back in February:
http://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack_Debian#BBW.2FBBB_.28All_Revs.29_Machinekit
According to github the .h file hasn't changed since 2013,
and the .c file since May 2015. So hopefully I'm looking
at the same code I'm
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016, at 10:42 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 7/31/2016 4:54 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
> >
> > I found the source on github, which included a commit from
> > January 2015, where Charles changed the pin numbering from
> > 1xx and 2xx to 8xx and
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016, at 10:44 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 7/31/2016 9:20 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
> >
> > 3) I successfully loaded it using input pin 803 (header P8, pin 3)
> >
> > loadrt hal_bb_gpio input_pins=803
> >
> > Jul 31 21:39:54 beag
"github is hard to use and not the appropriate tool
for user-submitted documentation revisions".
--
John Kasunich
jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github:
https://github.com/machinekit
---
You received this message be
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016, at 12:04 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 7/31/2016 10:12 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
> >
> > What is the bug? "claimed" fields retaining their value
> > over an unloadrt/loadrt cycle? Since they are arrays and
> > are initialized as
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016, at 09:16 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 8/1/2016 1:25 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
> >
> > Is it device tree that determines whether pins are used for MMC or GPIO,
> > etc?
>
> Not exactly. Ultimately, it is the pinmux control register in th
thing in that time but all I did is drive my frustration level
higher. Leaving for a while, hopefully by tomorrow someone can
explain how I can contribute an improvement to a man page when
the checkout doesn't include the man page!
--
John Kasunich
jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
--
web
ain text to the required asciidoc.
I'm not writing new pages. I'm trying to fix errors and omissions in halcmd
and HAL component man pages. Even in TROFF the formatting is no big
deal - simply copy an adjacent section and change the content while
leaving the formatting alone. Now that I kno
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016, at 04:01 AM, schoone...@btinternet.com wrote:
>
> On 08/08/16 06:01, John Kasunich wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016, at 02:10 AM, schoone...@btinternet.com wrote:
> >>
> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/machinekit/8tHlQEbvq2I
> &g
rs is that the code does what the docs
say it does, and vice versa.
--
John Kasunich
jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github:
https://github.com/machinekit
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
&qu
se. Try it.
It's not typing the letter that's the problem. Its knowing that you
need to type the letter.
You're probably right - neither of us is going to convince the other.
--
John Kasunich
jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://bl
ssue goes from a show-stopper for the user "Where's the
> documentation?!?" to a strange nuisance "When will I remember to type
> mank first?!?". :)
Agreed. And if I forget, the stub will remind me.
--
John Kasunich
jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
--
website: htt
Because Github considers machinekit to
be a fork of linuxcnc, it won't let me have personal forks of both repos.
Hopefully someone in the machinekit project can pull and merge these
commits.
--
John Kasunich
jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http:
ael as well as
others have gone to some lengths to ensure that the scriptmode output is
consistent even when interactive output changes.
--
John Kasunich
jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github:
https://github.com/machinekit
---
Yo
orrect data, unless it turns out that rev 4 is
the same as a previous rev as far as GPIO goes. I'm not familiar with RPi and
don't know how well such things are documented.
--
John Kasunich
jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machine
nalog current
feedback? Analog or resolver or absolute encoder or incremental
encoder for pendulum angles?
The nature of the required control and feedback signals will drive your
choice of control platform.
Regards,
John Kasunich
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016, at 12:20 PM, 'Luke Steele' via M
blocks, etc. You can write
your own realtime blocks in C, and non-realtime blocks in multiple
languages.
Skim thru this tutorial for a good overview that should help you decide
if it makes sense: http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/hal/tutorial.html
--
John Kasunich
jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
--
w
o - I'll have a read through. In
> general though, what is the 'correct' way to achieve high speed use of the
> GPIOs on the BBB?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Luke
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 7:21:01 PM UTC+1, John Kasunich wrote:
> >
> >
onverter and do the current
loop in software - although that would require MUCH faster
control loops relative to the pendulum control.
We've wandered far off topic for the machinekit mailing list.
I'd be happy to continue this discussion off-list. (Power electronics
and mot
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 12:31 PM, 'Luke Steele' via Machinekit wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 3:30:31 PM UTC+1, John Kasunich wrote:
> >
> >
> > You mentioned the LMD18200, and I looked it up. That is a chip, not a
> > comp
24 matches
Mail list logo
