On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 08:00 pm, Puneet Kishor wrote:
...
Here are some additional ways you can look at the log more
conveniently...
from the terminal, type
tail /private/var/log/httpd/error_log to see the last 10 lines.
Sometimes last 10 lines are not enough so you can pass a
On 4/14/02 11:17 PM, Alex S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he was just stirring up debate on the lack of my in the latter
example. Ie, not declaring variables (and thus scope).
Well... Scope isn't important - we can all just use globals and be done with
it.
-Sx- :]
How can I unsubscribe to this mailing list?
thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 8:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: canonical perl IDE for Mac OSX
Importance: Low
On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at
On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 07:21 , John Buono wrote:
[..]
When I created my scripts I used BBEdit, but did not set the type of file
to
Unix, I let it remain the default of Macintosh (well I was on a Mac).
I discovered that if the scripts are in Mac test format, they will not
run,
and
Hey this is a lot of fun.
For what little I do with PERL on the iMac I use xemacs. I guess I've got
the keystrokes too firmly embedded in my motor memory. I went out and
bought a Happy Hacking keyboard (for work and soon at home) so I wouldn't
have keep curling my little finger down to hit the
On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 06:21 , Bill -Sx- Jones wrote:
--boring, cautious, obvious over commented code--
Nothing wrong with being OVERLY cautious, especially if YOU expect to
understand why you did what you did months or years later.
I wrote a quick hack once to fix a short term
Bill == Bill -Sx- Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill Merlyn, you must have thought they were 'enjoyable' as well, once upon a
Bill time...
Yes, and seeing the damage that is done, I've since repented. I now
sell code review services as my atonement. :)
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 07:43 , Bill -Sx- Jones wrote:
On 4/15/02 10:34 AM, drieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on a vt52 dial up with only sed as your editor
Yes - and THAT is why I only use a Mac :)
So I don't have use vt52 OR sed;
my complements to your good fortune!
But given
At 10:43 AM -0400 4/15/02, Bill -Sx- Jones wrote:
On 4/15/02 10:34 AM, drieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on a vt52 dial up with only sed as your editor
Yes - and THAT is why I only use a Mac :)
So I don't have use vt52 OR sed;
Damn, your right. I just checked and terminal doesn't do
At 8:36 AM -0700 4/15/02, drieux wrote:
If anything the fact that they opted to go for the
plain jane vt100 mode is the 'warm fuzzy' - no need
to worry about esoteric and arcane 'termCap/termInfo'
settings for remote hosts
Actually the terminal setting lies. It is definitely not a vt100.
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 08:59 , Kee Hinckley wrote:
At 8:36 AM -0700 4/15/02, drieux wrote:
If anything the fact that they opted to go for the
plain jane vt100 mode is the 'warm fuzzy' - no need
to worry about esoteric and arcane 'termCap/termInfo'
settings for remote hosts
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:26 , drieux wrote:
Lou's list of books from
his URL seemed a good start - thought I would collect others.
Honey, come'ere lookit, someone has been on the Homepage!
--
Lou Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ellem.dyn.dhs.org:5281/
(OS X)
Drieux == Drieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Drieux I have the first printing from 1991 version - does this version have
Drieux a name??? So that when I mention it, I can use the culturally
Drieux accepted term. This remains the dog eared, coffee stained,
Drieux fast thumber - in lieu of a
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:54 , Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
[..]
Now, the next step would be to write a book that is how to spend your
*second* 40 hours with Perl :)
while that sorta sounds like a joke - it might help some of the
folks I know - sober as a judge
may I request an
Willam,
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 04:55 , William H. Magill wrote:
I'm not a programmer, so I may simply be mis-interpreting things.
I was hunting for a way to display the flags found in OS X in a
rational
manner. (ie not having to get info for every bloody file.)
So I found your
afaiunderstand, a sub should be a closed beast, no? poke it with something,
it returns something. That something should be just data (in good MVC
tradition (you can tell I have started to read the beginners guide to
programming Cocoa) and not any display information about that data. How that
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, PK Eidesis wrote:
afaiunderstand, a sub should be a closed beast, no? poke it with something,
it returns something. That something should be just data (in good MVC
tradition (you can tell I have started to read the beginners guide to
programming Cocoa) and not any
Chris Devers wrote:
afaiunderstand, a sub should be a closed beast, no? poke it with something,
it returns something. That something should be just data (in good MVC
tradition (you can tell I have started to read the beginners guide to
programming Cocoa) and not any display information about
--At 4/15/02 4:25 PM -0500, PK Eidesis wrote:
sub makeCalendar {
$type = _;
if($type eq month) {
print all the code for a monthly calendar;
elsif($type eq week) {
print all the code for a weekly calendar;
elsif($type eq year) {
print all the code for a yearly calendar;
}
}
I agree with Ryan. I think it's often more useful to have a string
returned, giving me the option of what I want to do with it higher up.
If you have the makeCalendar() subroutine print, I would rename it to
something like outputCalendar() or something to that effect. I like to
make sure
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 02:40 , Ryan wrote:
--At 4/15/02 4:25 PM -0500, PK Eidesis wrote:
sub makeCalendar {
$type = _;
if($type eq month) {
print all the code for a monthly calendar;
elsif($type eq week) {
print all the code for a weekly calendar;
elsif($type eq year) {
Since we're giving coding exmaples for ideas... One way to do it with a
Template enginer:
use Template;
my $calOutput = getCalendar('week');
print Content-type: text/html\n\n . $calOutput ;
sub getCalendar {
my $type = shift _;
my $template = Template-new( INCLUDE_PATH =
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 11:39 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
Maybe I'll have to try turning locales off if the bugs don't go
away... :/
I haven't been able to figure out how to use locales under OS X
anyway, so it's probably no big loss, eh? Or have you gotten
them working?
-Ken
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Alex S wrote:
Chris Devers wrote:
If yes, how do I accommodate repeated poking of the sub which
repeatedly returns data in a predictive display format? iow, do
I violate the above premise by making the sub return the display
info as well as shown below?
Well if the
On 4/15/02 5:21 PM, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] claimed:
I haven't been able to figure out how to use locales under OS X
anyway, so it's probably no big loss, eh? Or have you gotten
them working?
Hmm. I somehow rather doubt that they've been implemented in OS X in a
POSIXy way. For
so, everyone is in general agreement that...
Separating layout, logic data is a virtue in any programming
situation [which is why HTML is such an abomination, but I digress].
I guess I should have clarified that that is what I believe in already
(the separating part, not necessarily the
this list is becoming nearly useless if os x is supposed
to be its focus. if most of us wanted style guides, coding
advice, or the best way to lay out a calendar, we'd have
the good grace to seek those answers on lists and locations
where they are discussed.
a few off topic threads are natural
Replying briefly offlist because, well, I agree with you don't want to
waste more bandwidth. This list *has* gotten dull. To be honest, from my
perspective a lot of it is from this Puneet guy posting good but kinda
naive questions, like these about coding style, and Bill -OSX- Jones doing
much
you didn't have to answer stuff if it was boring... that's why its a
list, no. Scan, and delete it if it bores you.
sorry guys, maybe I'll lurk, maybe I'll leave, maybe I'll go back to my
day job. maybe I'll come back and rejoin this list when I too can write
stuff no one can understand.
see
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Puneet Kishor wrote:
sorry guys, maybe I'll lurk, maybe I'll leave, maybe I'll go back to my
day job. maybe I'll come back and rejoin this list when I too can write
stuff no one can understand.
No no no, please don't leave.
What I wrote was very rude and very
30 matches
Mail list logo
