Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-26 Thread Nick Ing-Simmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What about cvs update -ko? Something with -ko was what I did to get perl into CVS at work.

[OT] backslash when working with Japanese (Re: Pantherbites)

2003-07-25 Thread Joel Rees
* input method is a mess! I like the old one ("disintegrated") better. Yeah, I think the IM is going backwards as much as forwards, myself. * took 15 minutes to find how to enter '\' (backslash) instead of 」、 (yen) ONCE Kotoeri is enabled. Once Kotoeri is enabled,

Re: [OT] backslash when working with Japanese (Re: Pantherbites)

2003-07-25 Thread Robin
On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 03:44 PM, Joel Rees wrote: I was able to get the backslash in the Project Builder editor in Jaguar using the option key on the yen key or the forward slash key I'll vouch for the [option] + [yen] combo. FWIW [ option] + [ / ] yields a mathematical division sign

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-25 Thread Edward Moy
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 11:30 PM, Sherm Pendley wrote: On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 3:07 PM, Edward Moy wrote: A 5.8.1 version of Perl is in Panther, but whether *the* 5.8.1 final release will make Panther is another question. I hope, at least, that the final Panther will include a

5.8.1 differences (was Re: Pantherbites)

2003-07-24 Thread David R. Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for the probably silly question, but just what are the differences between 5.6.1 and 5.8.1? I am 100% ig'nant, but I assume that most/all 5.6.1 scripts will port fairly hands-off? What are some gotchas that us noobs should watch for to make sure our

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-24 Thread Edward Moy
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 11:55 AM, Tim Jenness wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 7:42 PM, Dan Kogai wrote: Apology accepted. Nevertheless, consider this problem fixed for final Panther. I am 80% proud and 20% scared to see my codes become

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-24 Thread Tim Jenness
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 7:42 PM, Dan Kogai wrote: Apology accepted. Nevertheless, consider this problem fixed for final Panther. I am 80% proud and 20% scared to see my codes become a part of the most popular *NIX available

Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread Dan Kogai
I have finally gotten an access to Panther so here is my preliminary report on it as a Perl5 Porter. Let me begin with pros * It is good looking * And fast * I love Expos~{(~}. Now cons * input method is a mess! I like the old one (disintegrated) better. * took 15 minutes to find how to enter

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread Dan Kogai
Hmm Mail 1.3 seems to need some more work (back in Jaguar) On Wednesday, Jul 23, 2003, at 21:32 Asia/Tokyo, Dan Kogai wrote: I have finally gotten an access to Panther so here is my preliminary report on it as a Perl5 Porter. Let me begin with pros * It is good looking * And fast * I

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread slaven
Arthur Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 01:32 pm, Dan Kogai wrote: Aha! Now I see. emoy has checked in MAINT19524 source and RCS retagged $Revision$. I'm sorry emoy but this is NOT THE RIGHT THING (TM). Perl module infrastructure depends

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread Daniel Stillwaggon
On Wednesday, Jul 23, 2003, at 05:32 US/Pacific, Dan Kogai wrote: Yes. As announced earlier Panther Preview comes w/ Perl 5.8.1-tobe (MAINT19524 to be exact) so I hope we will make Perl 5.8.1 a reality before Panther is. Sorry for the probably silly question, but just what are the

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread Arthur Bergman
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 01:32 pm, Dan Kogai wrote: Aha! Now I see. emoy has checked in MAINT19524 source and RCS retagged $Revision$. I'm sorry emoy but this is NOT THE RIGHT THING (TM). Perl module infrastructure depends heavily upon version numbers and auto-versioning via

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread Ilya Martynov
AB == Arthur Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AB On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 01:32 pm, Dan Kogai wrote: Aha! Now I see. emoy has checked in MAINT19524 source and RCS retagged $Revision$. I'm sorry emoy but this is NOT THE RIGHT THING (TM). Perl module infrastructure depends

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread Edward Moy
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 5:32AM, Dan Kogai wrote: # # $Id: Encode.pm,v 1.4 2003/05/20 22:49:15 emoy Exp $ # package Encode; use strict; our $VERSION = do { my @r = (q$Revision: 1.4 $ =~ /\d+/g); sprintf %d..%02d x $#r, @r }; Aha! Now I see. emoy has checked in MAINT19524 source and RCS

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread Chris Nandor
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Moy) wrote: Do you think this has never happened before? No, Perl 5.6.0 on Jaguar and previous had the same problem with CVS (no -ko option) and only now was it ever noticed. I noticed! :-) Shortly after Fred Sanchez first released

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread Ken Williams
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 07:32 AM, Dan Kogai wrote: Anyway, As an Encode Maintainer I naturally typed perl -MEncode -le 'print Encode-VERSION' and here is what Panther said 1.04 Ohmygod! Even Perl 5.8.0 comes with Encode ver. 1.75. WHAT HAS HAPPEND!? So I 'perldoc -m Encode' and

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread Dan Kogai
On Thursday, Jul 24, 2003, at 01:18 Asia/Tokyo, Edward Moy wrote: Did you file a bug report? Don't worry, I already did (#3340036). I was about to do but I am a Perl5 Porter before OS X user so @perl.org had precedence. Plus it is in the middle of the change of the season (rainy - summer) and

Re: Pantherbites

2003-07-23 Thread emoy
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 7:42 PM, Dan Kogai wrote: On Thursday, Jul 24, 2003, at 01:18 Asia/Tokyo, Edward Moy wrote: Sorry, I don't usually get personal, but tone of this message seemed inappropriate to me. And here is my apology for the tone of my voice. Well, I have cold to blame