On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Ken Williams wrote:
Maybe the 'gcc_select 2' command would be a relatively easy way to
test/debug it? I hadn't known about that command until Paul pointed it
out.
FYI, last I checked, all that command did was update a symlink so that
(from memory, not on a Mac right now)
On 03.12.2002 9:09 Uhr, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
I was thinking about working on Proc::ProcessTable to get support for OS
X. But after a little effort, it occurred to me that I have no clue how
to access process table information. Anyone know this kind of thing
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Williams) wrote:
I was thinking about working on Proc::ProcessTable to get support for OS
X. But after a little effort, it occurred to me that I have no clue how
to access process table information. Anyone know this kind of thing
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Nandor) wrote:
Mac::Processes can give you much of the information you could want. It
provides a PSN instead of a PID, but I could add GetProcessPID() and
GetProcessForPID() to Mac::Processes, which maps between the two. Take a
look
support for OS
X. But after a little effort, it occurred to me that I have no clue how
to access process table information. Anyone know this kind of thing, or
could tell me what docs to look at?
Thanks.
-Ken
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jerry Levan) wrote:
Regrettably sysctl does not give access to table info in the kernel.
Source code and commentary:
http://developer.apple.com/qa/qa2001/qa1123.html
You can get a list of all BSD processes, which includes daemon processes,
to access process table information. Anyone know this kind of
thing, or
could tell me what docs to look at?
Mac::Processes can give you much of the information you could want.
Yeah, that looks like exactly what I want. Now if I can just
get Mac::Carbon working under 10.1.5! =) Still haven't had any
Chris Nandor wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Williams) wrote:
Yeah, that looks like exactly what I want. Now if I can just
get Mac::Carbon working under 10.1.5! =) Still haven't had any
luck with that, it looks like a gcc 2/3 issue to me.
Yeah, I dunno. :/ I've not had any
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 11:41 AM, Chris Nandor wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Williams) wrote:
Yeah, that looks like exactly what I want. Now if I can just
get Mac::Carbon working under 10.1.5! =) Still haven't had any
luck with that, it looks like
