On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 19, 2007, at 2:51 AM, Chris Devers wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can draw a picture for you: http://finkproject.org/
In which case, your real argument appears
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:06:48PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All you have to do is call `apt-get
update` and you have the new packages with dependency handling built
in! (Even better than CPAN's because CPAN's can only handle perl
dependecies ...
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 19, 2007, at 2:51 AM, Chris Devers wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can draw a picture for you: http://finkproject.org/
In which case, your real argument appears to be the Fink people don't
seem to be doing what
On Oct 19, 2007, at 2:51 AM, Chris Devers wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:40 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
Back to the point, this is what I'm confused about. If what you
want is,
pretty narrowly described, Debian's distribution system, then why are
On Oct 18, 2007, at 3:29 AM, Ken Williams wrote:
On Oct 17, 2007, at 10:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 17, 2007, at 5:25 PM, brian d foy wrote:
In article B12928BB-8EB2-48E4-
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like I will have to stick with debian for developing
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripting Bridge
Use Objective-C, Ruby, and Python programs to automate Mac
applications. The new Scripting Bridge enables them to easily
generate AppleEvents using a concise, AppleScript-like syntax.
Not a single word about perl.
On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Chris Nandor wrote:
Not sure what you mean by
losing things from upstream.
Just that when I chose to compile software on my own, I lose all the
debian security work.
They look over packages and report
On Oct 18, 2007, at 4:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Chris Nandor wrote:
Not sure what you mean by
losing things from upstream.
Just that when I chose to compile software on my own, I lose all the
debian security work.
They look over packages and report
On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:40 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
On Oct 18, 2007, at 4:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Chris Nandor wrote:
Not sure what you mean by
losing things from upstream.
Just that when I chose to compile software on my own, I lose all
the debian
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:40 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
Sorry, I'm confused -- why not just use Debian then?
Yes.
Yes isn't a conventional answer to a why not question, but... sure.
You're basically saying you want their custom build
Some yummy facts about Leopard:
Scripting Bridge
Use Objective-C, Ruby, and Python programs to automate Mac
applications. The new Scripting Bridge enables them to easily
generate AppleEvents using a concise, AppleScript-like syntax.
Ruby on Rails
Work in a developer's dreamland. Leopard is
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripting Bridge
Use Objective-C, Ruby, and Python programs to automate Mac
applications. The new Scripting Bridge enables them to easily
generate AppleEvents using a concise, AppleScript-like syntax.
Mac OS X comes with
On Oct 17, 2007, at 5:25 PM, brian d foy wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripting Bridge
Use Objective-C, Ruby, and Python programs to automate Mac
applications. The new Scripting Bridge enables them to easily
generate AppleEvents using a concise,
On 10/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some yummy facts about Leopard:
Scripting Bridge
Use Objective-C, Ruby, and Python programs to automate Mac
applications. The new Scripting Bridge[...]
Not a single word about perl. No mention of CamelBones
I thought it was a well
In a message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, it does come with Mac::Carbon, and yes there is CamelBones. I just think
that Apple seems to ignore mentioning perl in their fancy marketing
campaigns. I get frustrated by that since there is a misunderstanding about
perl in
The Perl developers are kind of a quiet group. But I think that Apple
has done a very reasonable job for developers. I remember even in old
MacOS9 that this Perl was ahead of what I had on Sun Solaris OS. There
is always a leading edge, but my application need to be distributed,
therefore I am
On Oct 17, 2007, at 6:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some yummy facts about Leopard:
Scripting Bridge
Use Objective-C, Ruby, and Python programs to automate Mac
applications. The new Scripting Bridge enables them to easily
generate AppleEvents using a concise, AppleScript-like syntax.
On Oct 17, 2007, at 11:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had also hoped for a new version of perl
They're shipping the latest release (5.8.8, as noted by Ed Moy) -
what do you want them to do, ship bleadperl?
sherm--
Web Hosting by West Virginians, for West Virginians: http://wv-www.net
On Oct 17, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Trey Harris wrote:
Perhaps someone with the inside scoop can give some real beef
(though I understand that that sort of inside baseball is something
Apple strongly discourages). But I suspect it's just a case of
marketing types taking a temperature on what's
Not a single word about perl. No mention of CamelBones, using the
Scripting Bridge for perl, or the fact that perl has CPAN with
12,000+ high quality
I'm surprised that you are surprised. After all you took part in the
thread in which Sherm said this:
On Oct 17, 2007, at 10:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 17, 2007, at 5:25 PM, brian d foy wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like I will have to stick with debian for developing my
LAMP
applications.
If you want to work on the Mac, you still
21 matches
Mail list logo
