On 14 September 2016 at 21:15, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Sep 14, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>> On 2016-09-14 16:10, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> I had to remove these lines when deploying because I don't have a "docs"
>>> worker set up yet.
>>>
>>> Configuration Errors:
>>> builder
> We should put the buildername/buildnumber/URL of the failing build into
> the failcache to be reported back on a match. The current output would
> not be helpful to find the reason why it failed. I added this
> information to the build environment [1].
Just curious. Given that you already
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51689
Moving the discussion to macports-dev as this is about the
implementation, nothing users should care about.
On 2016-09-16 10:06, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> My proposal aims to introduce (and provide a proof of concept) of an
> optional other solution, which
On 2016-09-16 14:20, Craig Treleaven wrote:
> I’ve hit this scenario a couple of times. Am I doing something wrong with
> svn patch?
What is your umask set to? From the permissions it looks like this is
with umask 0077.
I encountered the same problem before. svn patch does not preserve the
On 2016-09-16 01:09, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 152743
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/152743
> Author: ryandes...@macports.org
> Date: 2016-09-15 16:09:26 -0700 (Thu, 15 Sep 2016)
> Log Message:
> ---
> Portgroups: replace "Mac OS X" and "OS X" with
Hi:
Fresh install of MacPorts on a new VM with an svn checkout of trunk, I get this
error:
$ sudo port install mariadb-server
Password:
Error: Unable to execute port: Could not open file:
/Users/macmyth/mp/trunk/dports/databases/mariadb/Portfile
I had applied a patch to mariadb, ala:
$ svn
On 2016-09-16 10:18, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
> Yeah, this contradicts what I'm seeing as expected. Given that
> you've signed /opt/local/bin/ggdb with an entitlement, it should be
> CS_RESTRICT which should imply CS_HARD. The lack of a code signature
> would trigger !CS_VALID which
On 2016-9-17 01:33 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2016-09-16 01:09, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 152743
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/152743
Author: ryandes...@macports.org
Date: 2016-09-15
> On Aug 20, 2016, at 2:07 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> On Aug 19, 2016, at 8:18 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> And our new buildbot automated build system announced earlier this month is
>> being hosted by me on my hardware, outside of Apple,
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> On 2016-09-16 14:20, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>> I’ve hit this scenario a couple of times. Am I doing something wrong with
>> svn patch?
>
> What is your umask set to? From the permissions it looks like this is
>
On 2016-9-17 00:04 , Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2016-09-16 14:20, Craig Treleaven wrote:
I’ve hit this scenario a couple of times. Am I doing something wrong with svn
patch?
What is your umask set to? From the permissions it looks like this is
with umask 0077.
I encountered the same problem
On Friday September 16 2016 16:06:54 Rainer Müller wrote:
>Moving the discussion to macports-dev as this is about the
>implementation, nothing users should care about.
You're not entirely right: users can and should care about ease of updating. I
posted to macports-users on purpose, to get the
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> On 2016-09-16 01:09, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
>> Revision: 152743
>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/152743
>> Author: ryandes...@macports.org
>> Date: 2016-09-15 16:09:26 -0700 (Thu, 15 Sep
On 2016-09-16 17:33, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>>
>> I would keep this as Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, the name does not change
>> retroactively.
>
> I suppose that's an open question. Previously, I've tried to use the OS
>
On Sep 16, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> I would keep this as Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, the name does not change
>> retroactively.
>
> I suppose that's an open question. Previously, I've tried to use the OS
> marketing name as it was when that OS version was
15 matches
Mail list logo