Re: [152630] contrib/buildbot-test

2016-09-16 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 14 September 2016 at 21:15, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On Sep 14, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: >> On 2016-09-14 16:10, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> I had to remove these lines when deploying because I don't have a "docs" >>> worker set up yet. >>> >>> Configuration Errors: >>> builder

Re: RFC: mp-buildbot failcache

2016-09-16 Thread Mojca Miklavec
> We should put the buildername/buildnumber/URL of the failing build into > the failcache to be reported back on a match. The current output would > not be helpful to find the reason why it failed. I added this > information to the build environment [1]. Just curious. Given that you already

Re: [MacPorts] #51689: preserve_runtime_libraries convenience PortGroup

2016-09-16 Thread Rainer Müller
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51689 Moving the discussion to macports-dev as this is about the implementation, nothing users should care about. On 2016-09-16 10:06, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > My proposal aims to introduce (and provide a proof of concept) of an > optional other solution, which

Re: Could not open Portfile

2016-09-16 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2016-09-16 14:20, Craig Treleaven wrote: > I’ve hit this scenario a couple of times. Am I doing something wrong with > svn patch? What is your umask set to? From the permissions it looks like this is with umask 0077. I encountered the same problem before. svn patch does not preserve the

Re: [152743] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group

2016-09-16 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2016-09-16 01:09, ryandes...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 152743 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/152743 > Author: ryandes...@macports.org > Date: 2016-09-15 16:09:26 -0700 (Thu, 15 Sep 2016) > Log Message: > --- > Portgroups: replace "Mac OS X" and "OS X" with

Could not open Portfile

2016-09-16 Thread Craig Treleaven
Hi: Fresh install of MacPorts on a new VM with an svn checkout of trunk, I get this error: $ sudo port install mariadb-server Password: Error: Unable to execute port: Could not open file: /Users/macmyth/mp/trunk/dports/databases/mariadb/Portfile I had applied a patch to mariadb, ala: $ svn

Re: lldb ...

2016-09-16 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2016-09-16 10:18, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > Yeah, this contradicts what I'm seeing as expected. Given that > you've signed /opt/local/bin/ggdb with an entitlement, it should be > CS_RESTRICT which should imply CS_HARD. The lack of a code signature > would trigger !CS_VALID which

Re: [152743] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group

2016-09-16 Thread Joshua Root
On 2016-9-17 01:33 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: On 2016-09-16 01:09, ryandes...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 152743 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/152743 Author: ryandes...@macports.org Date: 2016-09-15

Re: Goodbye Mac OS Forge, hello GitHub

2016-09-16 Thread Craig Treleaven
> On Aug 20, 2016, at 2:07 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > >> On Aug 19, 2016, at 8:18 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> And our new buildbot automated build system announced earlier this month is >> being hosted by me on my hardware, outside of Apple,

Re: Could not open Portfile

2016-09-16 Thread Craig Treleaven
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > On 2016-09-16 14:20, Craig Treleaven wrote: >> I’ve hit this scenario a couple of times. Am I doing something wrong with >> svn patch? > > What is your umask set to? From the permissions it looks like this is >

Re: Could not open Portfile

2016-09-16 Thread Joshua Root
On 2016-9-17 00:04 , Rainer Müller wrote: On 2016-09-16 14:20, Craig Treleaven wrote: I’ve hit this scenario a couple of times. Am I doing something wrong with svn patch? What is your umask set to? From the permissions it looks like this is with umask 0077. I encountered the same problem

Re: [MacPorts] #51689: preserve_runtime_libraries convenience PortGroup

2016-09-16 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Friday September 16 2016 16:06:54 Rainer Müller wrote: >Moving the discussion to macports-dev as this is about the >implementation, nothing users should care about. You're not entirely right: users can and should care about ease of updating. I posted to macports-users on purpose, to get the

Re: [152743] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group

2016-09-16 Thread Ryan Schmidt
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > On 2016-09-16 01:09, ryandes...@macports.org wrote: >> Revision: 152743 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/152743 >> Author: ryandes...@macports.org >> Date: 2016-09-15 16:09:26 -0700 (Thu, 15 Sep

Re: [152743] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group

2016-09-16 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2016-09-16 17:33, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: >> >> I would keep this as Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, the name does not change >> retroactively. > > I suppose that's an open question. Previously, I've tried to use the OS >

Re: [152743] trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group

2016-09-16 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Sep 16, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> I would keep this as Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, the name does not change >> retroactively. > > I suppose that's an open question. Previously, I've tried to use the OS > marketing name as it was when that OS version was