Yeah, my money is on 11.X being the 11.X SDK since that is typically the
pattern with iOS.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:21 PM Chris Jones
wrote:
>
>
> > On 19 Nov 2020, at 3:07 am, Ryan Schmidt
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Nov 18, 2020, at 21:04, Chris Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> On 19 Nov 2020, at
> On 19 Nov 2020, at 3:07 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 18, 2020, at 21:04, Chris Jones wrote:
>>
>> On 19 Nov 2020, at 2:31 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
On Nov 18, 2020, at 20:28, Saagar Jha wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2020, at 18:12, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
On Nov 18, 2020, at 21:04, Chris Jones wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2020, at 2:31 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>>> On Nov 18, 2020, at 20:28, Saagar Jha wrote:
>>>
On Nov 18, 2020, at 18:12, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Based on the fact that Apple has released a beta of macOS Big Sur 11.1
> On 19 Nov 2020, at 2:31 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 18, 2020, at 20:28, Saagar Jha wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 18, 2020, at 18:12, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> Based on the fact that Apple has released a beta of macOS Big Sur 11.1
>>> already, we can now see that Big Sur should be
On Nov 18, 2020, at 20:28, Saagar Jha wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2020, at 18:12, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> Based on the fact that Apple has released a beta of macOS Big Sur 11.1
>> already, we can now see that Big Sur should be referred to as version 11,
>> not 11.0 (and it would be reasonable to
The macOS SDK in Xcode 11.3 is MacOSX11.1.sdk.
> On Nov 18, 2020, at 18:12, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Based on the fact that Apple has released a beta of macOS Big Sur 11.1
> already, we can now see that Big Sur should be referred to as version 11, not
> 11.0 (and it would be reasonable to
Based on the fact that Apple has released a beta of macOS Big Sur 11.1 already,
we can now see that Big Sur should be referred to as version 11, not 11.0 (and
it would be reasonable to expect that next year's macOS will be version 12).
If you are fixing any ports that had been coded to assume
