I thought I'd get input on the list before filing a ticket in case
it's an issue on my side.
I've pasted the install output below.
There are a few references to libraries in /Developer/SDKs/
MacOSX10.4u.sdk/opt/local/lib/
libmad.0.dylib
libexpat.1.dylib
referenced from: /opt/local/lib/libfo
that fontconfig was updated just about a month ago, so
perhaps it's the new version that introduced usage of isysroot.
Anyway, I think I've thoroughly confused myself for the night.
Thanks
--Arno
On 2007/02/24, at 12:23, Arno Hautala wrote:
I thought I'd get input on the list
On 2007/02/25, at 05:01, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 01:35, Arno Hautala wrote:
I did some searching around and found this:
http://lists.apple.com/archives/darwin-dev/2006/Apr/msg00042.html
So it's an issue with the use of -isysroot
A symlink could be added pre-install, t
What kind of projects do you have in mind for the Summer of Code
people
to take on?
Another task could be to identify outdated ports, those that have
recent source available but the Portfiles have not been updated.
Some sources might lend themselves to automatically detecting recent
versio
On 2007/03/02, at 03:30, Emmanuel Hainry wrote:
Citando Arno Hautala :
What kind of projects do you have in mind for the Summer of Code
people
to take on?
Another task could be to identify outdated ports, those that have
recent source available but the Portfiles have not been updated.
Some
Congratulations. That's great news for everyone!
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Dear MacPorts users and developers,
>
> I'm pleased finally to be able to tell you that I have been hired to be your
> new Mac OS Forge administrator. I have been involved in improving MacPort
>From the Readme.md:
> You can also use a third-party packaging tool like Homebrew to install CMake
> and Ninja on OS X:
>
> brew install cmake ninja
Ouch.
--
arno s hautala/-| a...@alum.wpi.edu
pgp b2c9d448
___
macports-dev mailing list
macp
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Seems best to always create a branch before beginning any work, in case you
> find out later you have more work you want to submit.
I use git at work and our workflow is to create a new branch for every
issue, even if it's as small as a sing
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Building untrusted pull requests is however an entirely different matter
Hah, excellent point. Though now it strikes me what the current
situation is... Hold on, I have to go burn my computers. ;-)
--
arno s hautala/-| a...@alum.wpi
>>> The main question of procedure is: Should the main macports repo be
>>> used for proposing review of work in progress via pull requests? If
>>> not, what is the proposed method?
>>
>> I propose you put your changes on a branch, add the compare URL to a
>> ticket or send an email to macports-de
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Well, I tried that. I git stashed, then made changes to curl and committed
> them, and later when I tried to git stash pop, my other changes that I had in
> my git clone were not restored. I have no idea where they are now.
Can you try `gi
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 18:40, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> I am working through the process of building and installing three different
> source downloads in one Portfile.
Is there a reason that this can't, or shouldn't, be accomplished with
3 separate portfiles and possibly a fourth that depends
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 07:35, Pratul Kalia wrote:
>
> - Doing a port search does not show if the listed packages are installed or
> not
In addition to "search", installed packages would also be useful to
see when running "deps" or "info". Using color for this could help by
highlighting either
I'm guessing it will be here: https://github.com/markemer/Macports
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
> Do you have a link to your fork on Github? I would like to "star" it.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
>>
>> So I've started messing around with g
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Dear fellow MacPorts developers and enthusiasts,
>
> I’ve been working on a new MacPorts web site for some time, and I would like
> to share with you my work so far:
I really like the direction you've got so far. I've only been able to
loo
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Peter Danecek wrote:
>
> 2. Is there a way to "fetch" available binary packages, without installing
> the right away? There is the possibility do fetch all sources relevant for
> some port. Sometimes I would like to do something very similar with binary
> packag
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Peter Danecek wrote:
>
> Thanks for this hint. This is not yet documented in the man page, right? Or I
> just missed it?
> ~petr
Yeah, I don't think it's documented anywhere. Maybe the man page? I
found out about it myself by asking on one of the mail lists a few
Now that 2.3 is out, is trunk still a requirement for mpstats?
I tried installing the package from the original message, but I see
that it's installing mpstats 0.1.3, which is outdated. Is there a
0.1.4 package? I can put the files in a local tree if I need to, but I
figured I'd check on the packag
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2014-7-22 10:08 , Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>>
>> Checking for files that should not be in macports directory, that end up
>> being there. They could be left either by an old install, or by a different
>> installer that inappropriately put t
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Frank Schima wrote:
>
> Any thoughts or suggestions?
It might be usefull to include the list of ports that the maintainer
is listed on. Or at least implore the receiver to check on their end.
Bonus points for including the commands they need to run. Of course,
thi
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> If we were talking about portmgr then I would agree. But I don't think
> MacPorts is a collective noun, it's a proper noun denoting a single
> project. That the name has a plural form probably confuses the issue
> further.
>
> If we referred
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Lawrence Velázquez
wrote:
>
> a Subversion of Portfiles
That one nicely abstracts to VCS in general too.
A Subversion of Commits
Though it'd be annoying to change if the project ever switches to another...
A Git of Commits?
A Fool of Gits?
--
arno s hautal
I know Yosemite is officially only a couple days old, but I was
wondering if a new build slave is on the schedule. I think I recall
hearing that they're all VMs now so setting up new versions should be
"easier".
Thanks,
--Arno
--
arno s hautala/-| a...@alum.wpi.edu
pgp b2c9d448
Cool, thanks for the update.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2014-10-19 02:49 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2014, at 8:20 AM, Arno Hautala wrote:
>>
>>> I know Yosemite is officially only a couple days old, but I was
>>> w
Wouldn't testing and an announcement be a bit overdue? Aren't they
already available to be downloaded and installed? At least, I'm pretty
sure I've seen some packages being pulled down instead of being built.
I mean, testing probably isn't a bad idea, but if there are specific
issues that need to
Just CC them. Most mail clients / list servers will consolidate the
duplicate message and even if it doesn't it's not the worst thing to
get a duplicate. You and the list are in the To and CC fields with
this message. Did you get it twice?
It's only a mail list, but it feels weird to make that pub
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:23 AM, René J.V. wrote:
>
> I realised later that I should have evoked "knowledge of how many copies a
> given person would get". There are valid situations in which you'd like (or
> should) know if someone is on the list and would thus get a non-zero number
> of copi
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:22 AM, René J.V. wrote:
> On Tuesday February 10 2015 10:49:40 Arno Hautala wrote:
>
>>list. There's no way to ensure they *won't* get a message.
>
> Not by sending to the list, no. But there's always the option of sending to a
> h
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it's a feature of Gmail that deduplicates your mail. I do not
> use Gmail and I do get duplicate copies of mailing list messages that are
> also Cc'd to me.
As sent by Lawrence:
> http://www.list.org/mailman-member/node21.ht
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Artur Szostak wrote:
>
> Why does a pre-activate phase happen before a deactivation phase when
> upgrading from an older port revision to a newer one?
My assumption is that deactivating v1 is a requirement (dependency /
prerequisite) of activating v2, so it occu
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> trace mode, which blocks access to files a port should not be using (because
> they have not declared a dependency) is a great tool at providing this
> reproducibility. I do not see any use case for an individual port being able
> to by itself
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> I don't want to be pessimistic, but I will be enormously happy if
> we'll get the buildbot up and running at all.
> Given how long the 10.6 and 10.7 buildbots have been broken ...
>
> And yes, it would make a lot of sense to start the proces
What's the current size of a distfile mirror? I haven't seen any
statistics on any of the listed mirrors[1].
Thanks.
[1]: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Mirrors
--
arno s hautala/-| a...@alum.wpi.edu
pgp b2c9d448
___
macports-dev mailing list
Thanks, I've sent a question to a couple of them and I'll post back
any responses I get.
I'm not quite sure how I missed seeing the admin email address column.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2015, at 3:07 PM, Arno Hautala wrote:
>
&g
Thanks,
That is a lot of bits.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> On 20.08.2015 03:31 AM, Arno Hautala wrote:
>> Thanks, I've sent a question to a couple of them and I'll post back
>> any responses I get.
>>
>> I'm not quite sure h
There have been several messages to the MacPorts lists regarding the
trac outage.
It might be a good idea to post an outage notice acknowledging this
issue. Maybe even change all trac links to point to this notice?
--
arno s hautala/-| a...@alum.wpi.edu
pgp b2c9d448
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Still, there's not much difference to the user between the server doesn't
> respond (what we currently have) and a temporary server delivering a message
> stating that the server is temporarily out of service. The latter might even
> have n
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> Maybe it would be enough to search in the subject instead, but for some ports
> with generic names this would return many unrelated results.
It's less than ideal, but a convention of something like port_portname
would work for narrowing d
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 00:15, M. Daniel Becque wrote:
> I'm working on upgrading the port of Proftpd from 1.3.3c to 1.3.3g as a
> first step. From the binary file repository i see where the md5 # comes
> from but how do you get the sha1 and rmd160 numbers to place in the port
> file? There is ano
On 2012-04-06, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 4/5/12 9:53 PM, Arno Hautala wrote:
>>
>> Also, I think md5 in Portfiles is deprecated. The preferred hashes are
>> rmd160 and sha256.
>
> If upstream provides a md5, I like to use it, as it makes double checking
> the
> po
On 2012-04-06, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>
> Just curious, why two checkums? Is one not sufficient?
One thought would be that while one hash algorithm may exhibit a flaw
that allows arbitrary changes to the payload without altering the
hash, it's extremely unlikely that two hashes would be affected
> On 2012-4-6 23:07 , Arno Hautala wrote:
>
> I don't think MacPorts actually verifies every hash that is provided
> in the Portfile.
On 2012-04-06, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> It does.
On 2012-04-06, Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> It does verify every checksum the Port
On 2012-04-06, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-4-6 23:33 , Arno Hautala wrote:
>> Is there an effort to remove the deprecated algorithms? Or a date /
>> version for support to be removed? Just curious.
>
> Only md5 is really deprecated, and then only when used by itself. There
&
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 07:42, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Let's discuss it now. (Or, tomorrow; I need to sleep.) I want this change in
> MacPorts 2.1.0. Please help me understand what your objections are.
>
> [...]
>
> and raised a second concern about proxy servers, which I did not understand
If I
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 07:57, Clemens Lang wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:28:47AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> It's unclear what I'm meant to do with the warnings about files not
>> existing.
>
> Those are the reasons rev-upgrade will attempt to rebuild ports. We
> could omit them from the
On 5/15/12, C D wrote:
>
> Then there might be a bug: following the procedure in
> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/howto/ShareArchives2, I have set up a local
> archive repository, which I access through the URL http://localhost:6227/ .
> When this URL is put into ${prefix}/etc/archive_sites.conf,
One of the issues that I see time after time is problems due to users
having not followed the Migration instructions. I think it'd be
beneficial if MacPorts included code to detect a major OS change and
could then aid the user in completing the migration.
Migration consists of:
Reinstall Xcode (a
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>> Thoughts? What's already available for this? What is needed? What
>> isn't possible?
>
> We probably just need to store the version of the OS/Xcode in the sqlite db.
> If something doesn't match, we should (could) refuse to run and print
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>
> It could be nice to have ryan's script in there, however we don't necessarily
> know where the output file will get stashed. That'd be a bit more tricky, I
> think. And of course, convincing novices on piping or specifying the file
>
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>
> I think we suggest uninstall rather than deactivate, so that removes
> everything from sqlite db; it won't know about those ports' requested status
> any longer. However, we could make a temporary table that lists the
> requested-afte
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>
> Now that we're adding build-time conflicts, we might also be able to address
> opportunistic linking at build time (an old package is still active while
> rebuilding another). Until that's hammered out though (it's not even released
>
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>
> Hmm, well that all depends if system things changed out from under MacPorts.
> For example, if libcurl breaks:
>
> Since it can (and has) happened in the past, it's better to just always
> install a fresh version of the MacPorts files.
What about other options like chroot? Would it be possible to build
within a chrooted environment? Maybe that would be too heavy in having
to copy all dependencies to the chroot.
Maybe switch the macports prefix to /opt/local/chroot, move everything
in there (building, installing, etc), and then c
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>
> It's definitely capable of doing "build all".
Is there anything holding back a "build all"? It'd be nice to get the
rest of the packages available for ML.
--
arno s hautala/-| a...@alum.wpi.edu
pgp b2c9d448
___
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-12-5 03:39 , Arno Hautala wrote:
>>
>> Is there anything holding back a "build all"?
>
> It's already done one, that's the upload that failed because of not
> enough disk space mentione
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> I am opposed to moving to a whole new hosting provider due to the
> technical implications on the infrastructure. Our database of issues in
> Trac is quite large and I don't think it could easily be transferred to
> Github or anywhere else.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> I wonder if the license will be a problem. Apple apparently has a policy
> against shipping GPLv3 code in their products, but I don't know if the
> same applies for something hosted on macosforge.
I think the problem with GPLv3 is that there
Can someone look at #40985 and commit the patch?
Thanks.
--Arno
--
arno s hautala/-| a...@alum.wpi.edu
pgp b2c9d448
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
All this reminds me that I have some mods for cpan2port that might be
useful for others. There are two new options:
-w wraps and indents long dependency and hash lines
-d follows perl dependencies and creates portfiles for the full tree.
The dependency option may be a bit of overkill right no
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 21:32, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> On May 18, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Arno Hautala wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Hard links don't play nicely with Time Machine
>>
>> The don't. As an example, below is the output from some hard linked
>> fi
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 21:45, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> TM does *not* properly preserve hard links, it simply makes redundant copies,
> and I'm not sure how I got the impression that it did. I'll be filing a bug
> report on it, if only to see which existing bug they dup it to. :-)
No apolo
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 21:45, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> TM does *not* properly preserve hard links, it simply makes redundant copies,
> and I'm not sure how I got the impression that it did. I'll be filing a bug
> report on it, if only to see which existing bug they dup it to. :-)
I just r
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 04:24, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> At present, if you don't want +openmpi in this situation, you have to
> install with an explicit -openmpi (which is then preserved when you
> upgrade).
Is this true? I thought negative variants were not currently stored
on install and therefor
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:31, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
> Has anyone recently run `port install dot2texi` lately and seen it take 10
> minutes just to do the dependency calculation?
Nope. Though it does depend on texlive. And I already have that installed.
Also, are you using the SQLite databas
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 17:27, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
> Sqlite.
>
> If you try to install it without any texlives already there it takes forever
> to compute the department. Simply installing texlive-basic speeds it up to
> normal. Something odd is going on
Maybe, though if no texlive is instal
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:10, Jann Röder wrote:
>
> What is this supposed to tell me? I checked manually: Fetching works
> fine. Especially weird is the first line for the distfiles.macports.org
> mirror which I do not list in the portfile.
Well, it worked fine for you, but not for the user who
On Sep 20, 2010, at 13:44, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>
> Well MacPorts is ready to do binary distribution: how would that ability
> change your your prospects?
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 14:54, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>
> Yup. Been using it since 1.9 came out, even signing my own packages (until
> Mac
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:31, Anders F Björklund wrote:
>
> I think the main objection to sha256 checksums was
> that they were "too long", even though one sha256
> is shorter than two as in both of sha1 and rmd160...
Has this really come up as an issue?
--
arno s hautala /-| a...@alum.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 04:49, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2010-11-8 19:55 , Galen Wright-Watson wrote:
>>
>> Would a nodepts pseudoport be useful?
>
> Maybe; do you have a use case for this where leaves isn't what you want?
When you want to see which ports you _could_ remove, that aren't
depended on
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:38, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>> If we wanted to implement a download counter, we could do so with a central
>> redirector script for example. That would also give us the opportunity to do
>> more intelligent Geo-IP-based mirror selection, instead of the current
>> ping-
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:39, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>
> Just an FYI, I attempted building google-authenticator on 10.6.
What does Google-Authenticator provide for a desktop OS? I thought it
was just Android, Blackberry, and PAM.
Would this be a way to compile those components? Or is there deskt
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 22:42, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>> What does Google-Authenticator provide for a desktop OS? I thought it was
>> just Android, Blackberry, and PAM.
>> Would this be a way to compile those components? Or is there desktop support
>> as well?
>
> I assumed that if it can be use
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 09:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2011, at 5:24 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
>>
>> It would be more useful to add the download size,
>> than to use two separate 160-bit checksum lines ?
>
> In reality the digest is more of an integrity than a security check (imho)
>
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:51, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> Instead of setting off on a mass-edit of Portfiles, I'd suggest
> just automating file size (and digests for that matter) outside
> of build recipes. You can get that info (in most cases) with
> just a wee bit of scripting.
I do the same right
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 16:29, Chris Jones
wrote:
>
> but as I say, /Library/Tcl does not exist here ...
Sounds like a broken install. I have "/Library/Tcl" which contains a
single symlink "macports1.0" which points to
"/opt/local/share/macports/Tcl/macports1.0"
--
arno s hautala /-| a..
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 14:56, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> Now, all that said, we've been debating this whole topic in something of a
> rarified atmosphere. If you have a small pile of patches that you are
> sitting on which actually implement "securing the supply chain" in building
> ports t
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:27, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> You are assuming a threat vector reasoning that starts:
> 0) assume sudo is "infected" maliciosly.
> ...
> 42) anything is possible, including other ppkgs infected and
> distributed.
>
> The answer there is not using an p
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 06:12, Bayard Bell
wrote:
>
> I've read back on the threads from March about binary packaging and
> appreciate better what constraints were accepted to simplify deployment. The
> signed Macports releases in distfiles that Anders pointed me to is signed
> with GPG. Given tha
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:38, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Arno Hautala wrote:
>>
>> So let's say you're for some reason using the MacPorts sudo instead of
>> the system shipped version (maybe the system version is out of date
>> and
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:55, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>> So let's say you're for some reason using the MacPorts sudo instead of
>> the system shipped version (maybe the system version is out of date
>> and insecure). You're updating your ports at a cafe and someone spoofs
>> the update for the sudo
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:02, Bayard Bell
wrote:
>
> I think we need to temper how the examples are flying: an evil network
> operator can do egregious damage, but macports isn't exactly the thing end of
> the wedge for exploiting the implied level of trust.
True. Outlandish examples can be sa
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:04, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On Apr 18, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Arno Hautala wrote:
>
>> I'm all for more GPG adoption, but it might be a good idea to be
>> consistent and stick with OpenSSL.
>
> These are opinions only, without any supplied
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:35, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> The actual implementation goes something like this:
> a keypair is generated
> just built packages are
> a) include the pubkey
> b) signed with the private key
> and the private key is discard
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:34, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> You asked what other systems are in use. I replied. If you
> don't like what is implemented, all I can say is
> Patches cheerfully accepted.
I asked what systems are in use in order to investigate options for MacPorts.
I'm pointing out
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:36, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Arno Hautala wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:34, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> You asked what other systems are in use. I replied. If you
>>> don&#x
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 17:03, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> Step 1: Source tarballs on random web/ftp sites.
> [...]
> Do we get more or less assurance by caching all of the tarballs on Mac OS
> Forge? It restores some level of control, but it also means there's one
> centralized location to at
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 17:07, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> I assumed that this was already possible and was amazed that it wasn't...
> with this patch, one can set "compiler" in $prefix/etc/macports.conf to
> choose a default compiler.
>
> Thoughts?
What's the use case for wanting to select a com
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 16:52, Felipe Tanus wrote:
> 2011/6/23 Rainer Müller :
>>
>> LGPL would definitely be a license issue as MacPorts is licensed under BSD.
>
> Oh, that's bad. Ok, thank you.
I didn't think LGPL within BSD was a problem. Is this a MacPorts
decision? Or am I misinformed as to
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 13:56, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2011, at 11:02, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
>> Is there a port command to install but not activate a port?
>
> Not in MacPorts 1.9.2. I think I saw something go into trunk to do that a
> little while ago?
Now that 2.0 is out, is t
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 19:27, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> The 'archive' action was repurposed to install but not activate, yes.
Nice, thanks.
--
arno s hautala /-| a...@alum.wpi.edu
pgp b2c9d448
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.mac
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 19:54, Dan Ports wrote:
>
> It only comes up for ports which install multiple files with the same
> name but different caps. openssl seems to be the main culprit, so I
> committed a hack to make it skip fetching archives in r81559. If other
> ports have the same problem, we
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:23, Marko Käning wrote:
>
> How many ports could you successfully build so far? I mean, are you stuck at
> 10, 30, or only 80% of all ports?
And how does the build proceed? Seeing as there are ports that
conflict with each other, I imagine that a straight "port install
I've just published a new HowTo on the Wiki regarding signing and
sharing archives under MacPorts 2.
I'd appreciate a few eyes looking over it for accuracy and clarity.
Specifically, anything that needs to, or could, be clarified or
trimmed.
It's a bit lengthy, but the majority of that are inline
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 04:07, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> You're talking about this:
>
> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/howto/ShareArchives2
I always forget the most important piece right?
> Please pick a different suggested location for the keys that is not within
> /usr/local.
Good point. I'd co
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:37, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> You use "/opt/local" throughout the document except for a few cases where you
> use "${prefix}".
> For readability consider using "/opt/local" everywhere and add a blurb at the
> top "This document assumes the default MacPorts install p
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 20:03, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> Blair: I thought you were meaning; IF +cpio is not specified AND port cpio is
> an activate port; than add cpio to rpm52 ports DEFAULT variants.
This brings to light the problem of "hidden dependencies" where the
configuration notices t
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 03:44, Clemens Lang wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 10:28:48PM -0400, Arno Hautala wrote:
>>
>> I think the GSOC project that would introduce "rev-upgrade"
>> could be of use here. It could at least mark decencies after
>> compilatio
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 05:42, Frank J. R. Hanstick wrote:
> Hello,
> The following occurred during an upgrade:
>
> [snip]
>
> ---> Activating p5.12-scalar-list-utils @1.230.0_2
> Error: Target org.macports.deactivate returned: Active version of
> p5-scalar-list-utils is not 1.230.0_1 but
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 17:47, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> I use this script:
>>
>> http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2010-June/020560.html
>>
>> Actually, an updated version of that script I should commit it to the
>> repo
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 03:29, Anders F Björklund wrote:
>
> Pity, though. There's nothing *that* special between
> all the various package managers and their file formats
> and their dependencies, except that they're "different" ?
It's not so much that they're different, but that they track and
m
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
