Re: [GSoC] migration

> >> I was trying to streamline the whole process and I felt the need to > have the snapshot as a separate entity just like a reg_entry or a > reg_portgroup is, that is, "registry::snapshot" with a bunch of functions > like create, get, list_all etc. I think this might help in writing the > whole

Re: [GSoC] migration

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2017-8-10 04:59 , Umesh Singla wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I was trying to streamline the whole process and I felt the need to have >> the snapshot as a separate entity just like a reg_entry or a reg_portgroup >> is, that is,

Re: [GSoC] migration

On 2017-8-11 03:41 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: I think Josh is referring to 3NF normalization (third normal form). I don’t think this use case warrants this complexity. I think it is fine for two snapshot id’s to reference the same port+variant combination. When a snapshot id is deleted,