Re: stuck in loop with restore_ports.tcl migrating to macOS Sierra (10.12.1)

Am 02.11.2016 um 23:48 schrieb Murray Eisenberg: After upgrading from OS X El Capitan to macOS Sierra (10.12.1), I’m following the migration steps at https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration. Against the recommendations in that article, I discovered the easiest way to migrate is to reinstall

Re: webkit-gtk2: Will it ever be fixed?

Am 24.10.16 um 01:27 schrieb David Evans: I did a test build this morning and, with the information you have provided, was able to reproduce the problem. Opened ticket https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52688 to track the issue and copied you there so you can see what's going on. Thanks for

Re: webkit-gtk2: Will it ever be fixed?

Am 18.10.16 um 02:35 schrieb Lawrence Velázquez: You probably want webkit2-gtk. Yes, this is what I tried to install and fails, sorry. ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org

Re: webkit-gtk2: Will it ever be fixed?

Am 18.10.2016 um 01:19 schrieb Lawrence Velázquez: Are you talking about webkit-gtk-2.0? I think so. Whats the alternative? That port is not supported on recent systems, and it errors out with a message saying so. No, it fails with "command execution failed"...

webkit-getk2: Will it ever be fixed?

Since my upgrade to macOS sierra I tried compiling and installing webkit-gtk2 for weeks, again and again. Even though I got a new version every time, it still fails to build. Will it ever be fixed? I find it so disturbing that I always come across broken ports. If a build fails, please don't

Re: Uninstalling Macports

Barrie Stott wrote on 24.06.2016 19:10: I am not experiencing any issues and am unsure whether I need to uninstall MacPorts. Can someone tell me if I need to uninstall Macports? You don't. Just download the installer package from MacPort's website. Then you will be able to do a "port

Re: Macports fails to build in macOS 10.12 Sierra

> Am 19.06.2016 um 05:24 schrieb Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia : > > As a reminder, macOS 10.12 Sierra has only been released as a developer > preview to developers and is covered by an NDA. Ever heard of something called "free speech"? The snowden leaks were also covered by

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

Andrea Giammarchi wrote on 08.05.2016 11:19: Like I've said, telling users they need to wait at least one hour to install and build gtk3 +quartz and webkit2-gtk +quartz due lack of pre built version will move me and them away from MaxPorts. I don't think so. There aren't really any good

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

Andrea Giammarchi wrote on 07.05.2016 11:51: Thanks in advance for considering it, as a user it would be awesome so I can stop warning Mac Users that having a good looking GTK3 app requires at least one hour via MacPorts due lack of pre-built quartz packages. I always thought that

Re: de/activate and Time Machine

René J.V. Bertin wrote on 26.04.2016 13:19: Superfluous backing up of course ends up wasting significant amount of space on the backup disk esp. for developers who regularly to something like `port -n upgrade --force` after an incremental rebuild with only minimal changes. It is also costly

Re: lost terminal after quitting python3

> Am 21.03.2016 um 00:34 schrieb Eric A. Borisch : > > Either install the py33-readline port Definitely the easiest way and fixed it immediately for me. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ macports-users

Re: lost terminal after quitting python3

> Am 20.03.2016 um 18:47 schrieb petr.2...@centrum.cz: > > I found a problem in my installation. When I use python3 in terminal I am > loosing keyboard input in the terminal after leaving the python. I have to > quit the terminal and open another one. Python27 works OK. You need to install

Re: Why do so many builds fail?

> Am 09.03.2016 um 17:01 schrieb Ryan Schmidt : > > There is no "stable" release of MacPorts. Everything is provided as-is and > best-effort. We are all volunteers, not being paid to work on this. I know, thats okay. I don't demand anyone to support his ports like a

Why do so many builds fail?

Today I was running an upgrade and it failed building webkit2-gtk and I'm somewhat pissy about this, as I don't want to be forced debugging ports before I can continue with my coding. Is there any stable release of macports or and how comes that buggy ports make it into the ports tree all the

Re: Is there a good version of Time Machine?

> Am 22.02.2016 um 08:52 schrieb Dave Horsfall : > > I ask because either it won't back up .dotfiles, or I've forgotten to > click one of those box thingies... Time Machine can do complete system restores, which is why it needs to backup every file. However, it could be

Re: installer doesn't modify root path

> Am 02.02.2016 um 06:33 schrieb Phil Oertel : > > I'm unable to sudo run any port commands after installing macports (version > 2.3.4, system is El Capitan 10.11.3). I installed via the package installer. > After running the installer and opening a new shell, my login

Re: MacPorts for non-Internet-connected networks

> Am 28.01.2016 um 03:09 schrieb Ryan Schmidt : > > Please Reply All when you reply, so that the conversation stays on the > mailing list and all can benefit from it. Sorry, I forgot about that. Most mailing list systems add their own adress as reply-to. > Other

Re: Xcode installed before macports?

Timothy W. Grove wrote on 19.01.2016 23:21: Must the latest Xcode be installed before macports? I installed Xcode 3.2 in Snow Leopard, then macports before I discovered there was an Xcode 4.2 available for Snow Leopard. Do I now need to remove macports and reinstall it to make use of Xcode 4.2?

Re: Xcode installed before macports?

Ryan Schmidt wrote on 20.01.2016 04:11: Xcode 4.0, 4.1 and 4.2 for Snow Leopard are not recommended because they are not free so MacPorts is tested much less well on those versions and you are likely to run into more problems when using them. However, it is still VERY unlikely he will run

Error installing qt5-qtwebengine

Hi, I tried to install qt5-qtwebengine as a dependency for py34-pyqt5. This is the output I got: ---> Computing dependencies for qt5-qtwebengine ---> Staging qt5-qtwebengine into destroot Error: No files have been installed in the destroot directory! Error: Please make sure that this software

Re: Variant conflicts

Eric A. Borisch wrote on 21.11.2015 05:45: Unfortunately, the portfile states that "portions of this port are X11 specific so a +quartz build is not possible." I don't know the specifics, but I'm guessing it's not trivial. I don't think so. According to my experience with debians package

Re: Variant conflicts

> Am 19.11.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Eric A. Borisch : > > port echo active and variant:quartz and variant:x11 \ > | sed -n -e '/\+quartz/d;s/@[^+-]*//;s/\+x11/-x11+quartz/p' \ > | xargs -n 2 That worked, thanks. But it resulted in another problem. >:(( > Error:

Re: Variant conflicts

Eric A. Borisch wrote on 18.11.2015 15:43: You are using upgrade; what does 'port active and gtk3' show? +x11 perhaps? From the man page: By selecting the variants to use in the upgraded build of the port, any variants specified on the command line take highest precedence, then the variants

Variant conflicts

Hi there! Today I ran a port upgrade outdated and got the following message: > Error: gtk3: Variant quartz conflicts with x11 > Error: Unable to open port: Error evaluating variants But my variants.conf is > -x11 +no_x11 +quartz +bash_completion So whats going on? There's a minus in front of

Re: Modification of .profile

Ryan Schmidt wrote on 19.10.2015 11:10: And if there's a problem where MacPorts modifies the profile even if the MacPorts prefix is already in the path, then that could be a bug that we should fix. That might be the case. I didn't know there is a check. It didn't work though. Also, this is

Modification of .profile

May I suggest to add an option for the PKG installer to disable automativ modification of user's ~/.profile file? On my system I modified my /etc/paths file to include MacPorts ater my own /usr/local. When I installed a new version by using the PKG today, I found my .profile and PATH modified

Re: Darwin Version

> Am 02.10.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Ryan Schmidt : > > We're trying to make MacPorts into a system that just works, and that means > that when we discover common situations where MacPorts fails to work, we try > to modify MacPorts so that users are less likely to

Re: Incompatible library version

Michel Perez wrote on 08.10.2015 09:21: Will I have to choose between matlab and macport? Try removing it from the MATLAB script yourself and see if it still runs. ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org

Re: Darwin Version

Dave Horsfall wrote on 06.10.2015 09:53: Anyway, "from scratch" => "clean-room implementation" e.g. Unix/Linux, whereas "evolved" => V5/V6/V7/4.nBSD/BSDI/FreeBSD/OpenBSD/etc. Is this discussion of any importance? I don't see why. ___ macports-users

Re: Darwin Version

Dominik Reichardt wrote on 06.10.2015 11:10: While it is off topic, why the need to be so rude? I'm not rude, just asking. :) There is always many discussion about what is a real UNIX, if something was derived or rewritten, if Linux is UNIX and so on... I just don't get what's the reason for

Re: Darwin Version

Jeffrey A. Singleton wrote on 03.10.2015 15:35: As you can see…the very first command run as instructed by the so-called migration steps shows the same error. Basically…nothing anyone has suggested so far even remotely comes close to a solution, and the migration page is useless. WTF is going

Re: Darwin Version

Clemens Lang wrote on 03.10.2015 15:02: such as /bin/sh, /usr/bin/python, /usr/bin/make, /usr/bin/clang, etc. All of which are also part of macports, so can't you just use this or create shadowcopies yourself? ___ macports-users mailing list

Re: Darwin Version

> Am 01.10.2015 um 16:08 schrieb Rainer Müller : > > It may appear to be still working right now, but there is no guarantee > that it will work at all. Even if it seems to be working now, later > updates will cause problems. For example updates will link to a > different set

Re: Darwin Version

> Am 02.10.2015 um 15:24 schrieb Brandon Allbery : > > If you don't like it, don't use OS X, because Apple is not going to change. > It will break stuff as it sees fit. This is the price of living in Apple's > world. Maybe. Seems like I'm just not getting what is

Re: Darwin Version

Brandon Allbery wrote on 02.10.2015 15:52: Dependencies. Port X compiles against new libSystem, depends on port Y that was linked against old libSystem, link fails because it tries to bring in both versions and they conflict. (Keeping around old libSystem versions is how you can still run

Re: Darwin Version

William H. Magill wrote on 02.10.2015 17:21: Some vendors mad “backwards compatibility a priority. Most did not — upgrade the OS, switch vendors, work cross-platform - you were on your own. Sadly this this is true, even though it wouldn't have to. It’s Apple’s way or the highway. They know

Darwin Version

Hi, could anyone please tell me where MacPorts saves on which operating system version it was installed, so i can bump it? It says "Current platform 'darwin 15' does not match expected platform 'darwin 14'". I read the Migration instructions, but sorry. No. It is idiotic to reinstall all of my