Re: mariadb upgrade fetch fail last

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote: > However, I am watching my MacBook Air reporting 99%, 43.5M Total, 43.4M > Received from each of the sites which responded, including the same site > which delivered it to the iMac.- > http://ykf.ca.distfiles.macports.org/MacPorts/mpdistf

Re: mariadb upgrade fetch fail last

> On Aug 19, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2015, at 7:34 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht > wrote: >> >>> On Aug 18, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Stan Sanderson >> > wrote: >>> On Aug 18, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Jan Steinma

Re: mariadb upgrade fetch fail last

> On Aug 19, 2015, at 3:23 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht > wrote: >>> Regarding the mirrors- I know of no reason the iMac would be using a >>> different set of mirrors than the MacBook. When using the MacBook on the >>> evening of the 17th

Re: OS X 10.11 status

> On 19 Aug 2015, at 9:11pm, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Chris Jones wrote: > >> Yes, you should expect to compile all ports as there are no binary >> archives as of yet. > > Have you seen what your CPU temperature hits? I can boil water at 100ºC > (that's 212ºF for Americ

Re: OS X 10.11 status

On Aug 19, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Chris Jones wrote: > >> Yes, you should expect to compile all ports as there are no binary >> archives as of yet. > > Have you seen what your CPU temperature hits? I can boil water at 100ºC > (that's 212ºF for Americans

Re: mariadb upgrade fetch fail last

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Regarding the mirrors- I know of no reason the iMac would be using a > different set of mirrors than the MacBook. When using the MacBook on the > evening of the 17th and subsequently additional attempts on the following > day, the Fetch

Re: mariadb upgrade fetch fail last

> On Aug 19, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Stan Sanderson wrote: > > >> On Aug 19, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht > > wrote: >> >> On Aug 19, 2015, at 7:34 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht > > wrote: >>> On Aug 18, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Stan Sanders

Re: OS X 10.11 status

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Chris Jones wrote: > Yes, you should expect to compile all ports as there are no binary > archives as of yet. Have you seen what your CPU temperature hits? I can boil water at 100ºC (that's 212ºF for Americans). I hate it when libpng has to be compiled again and again; I

Re: gtk-osx-application-gtk2 problem

Hi Dominik, you should - sudo port deactivate -f gtk-osx-application - sudo port activate gtk-osx-application-gtk2 - check that gimp2 still works (you may want to upgrade it). - sudo port uninstall gtk-osx-application gtk-osx-application has been split into different subports so gtk-osx-

Re: OS X 10.11 status

> On 19 Aug 2015, at 6:14pm, semaphor...@yahoo.com wrote: > > It's a migrated machine from 10.10, latest version. Perhaps it would come > from this single fact? so was my vm … > > Enviado desde mi iPhone > > El 2015-08-19, a las 13:07, Chris Jones escribió: > >> >> >>> On 19 Aug 2015, at

Re: OS X 10.11 status

> On 19 Aug 2015, at 5:49 pm, "semaphor...@yahoo.com" > wrote: > > It's not just a matter of compiling, but compilation TIME. It takes > significantly longer than it would on 10.10. On the other hand, my test is > done on a hardware machine, not a VM one, so I guess it's just another case >

Re: OS X 10.11 status

Dominik Reichardt writes: > Hi, > > I’m itching to switch but often need MacPorts. Do any of you have experience > yet with it *AND* MacPorts? Join the club :-( > In previous switches, I switched by using the development version of MacPorts > and following the migration steps of any major OS

Re: OS X 10.11 status

It's a migrated machine from 10.10, latest version. Perhaps it would come from this single fact? Enviado desde mi iPhone El 2015-08-19, a las 13:07, Chris Jones escribió: > > >> On 19 Aug 2015, at 5:49 pm, "semaphor...@yahoo.com" >> wrote: >> >> It's not just a matter of compiling, but co

Re: mariadb upgrade fetch fail last

> On Aug 19, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2015, at 7:34 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht > wrote: >> >>> On Aug 18, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Stan Sanderson >> > wrote: >>> On Aug 18, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Jan Steinma

Re: mariadb upgrade fetch fail last

On Aug 19, 2015, at 7:34 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > >> On Aug 18, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Stan Sanderson > > wrote: >> >>> >>> On Aug 18, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Jan Steinman >> > wrote: >>> From: Stan Sanderson mailto:stans...@gmail.com>> >

Re: OS X 10.11 status

It's not just a matter of compiling, but compilation TIME. It takes significantly longer than it would on 10.10. On the other hand, my test is done on a hardware machine, not a VM one, so I guess it's just another case of "it (doesn't) work on my machine. Enviado desde mi iPhone El 2015-08-19,

Re: OS X 10.11 status

> Am 19.08.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Chris Jones : > > > >> On 19/08/15 16:13, C.T. wrote: >> >>> Experience: 10.11 is still in beta, and it shows. With XCode beta, expect >>> HOURS of compilations for a mere update, and many manual operations since >>> MacPorts doesn’t yet recognizes El Capita

Re: OS X 10.11 status

On 19/08/15 16:13, C.T. wrote: Experience: 10.11 is still in beta, and it shows. With XCode beta, expect HOURS of compilations for a mere update, and many manual operations since MacPorts doesn’t yet recognizes El Capitan I disagree on two of the three points. Yes, you should expect to c

OS X 10.11 status

> Experience: 10.11 is still in beta, and it shows. With XCode beta, expect > HOURS of compilations for a mere update, and many manual operations since > MacPorts doesn’t yet recognizes El Capitan > >> El 19 ago 2015, a las 4:41, Dominik Reichardt escribió: >> >> Hi, >> >> I’m itching to swi

Re: mariadb upgrade fetch fail last

> On Aug 18, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote: > >> >> On Aug 18, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Jan Steinman wrote: >> >>> From: Stan Sanderson >>> >>> Re: fail to fetch on OS 10.10.5, MacBook Air- I copied >>> mariadb-5.5.43.tar.gz from the iMac into the dist file on the Air. I then >>> ran por

Re: apple-gcc42 fails to build

On 19/8/15 7:12 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Hmm. Ok, I do see that the llvm-3.4 portfile does blacklist gcc 4.2 build 5577 and older (in other words, the versions of gcc 4.2 in Xcode 3.1.4 and earlier), so you're right, that won't work here. However, I don't see that same blacklist in the llvm-3.5 an

OS X 10.11 status

Hi, I’m itching to switch but often need MacPorts. Do any of you have experience yet with it *AND* MacPorts? In previous switches, I switched by using the development version of MacPorts and following the migration steps of any major OS X upgrade, still the way to go? Take care Dom

gtk-osx-application-gtk2 problem

Hi all, when I upgraded my ports yesterday, I ran into this and am fearing that when I go the force way it will lead to the dark side, e.g. suffering on my part… :) Activating gtk-osx-application-gtk2 @2.0.8_0 Error: org.macports.activate for port gtk-osx-application-gtk2 returned: Image error: