Well, good to hear that the Ubiquiti gear was accessible, at any rate. I’m not
exactly in love with the idea of a dedicated configuration app, but since Apple
do it, I probably shouldn’t complain, even though I do because it’s just plain
wrong and dammit this is why we have standards. :)
Yes,
attin Gucukoglu
Sent: Tuesday, 31 May 2016 5:45 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Apple pulls Airport routers, possible refresh coming
Eu-bloody-reka!
http://www.chriscolotti.us/technology/apple-airports-dirty-little-secret/
Recent firmware that supports extending guest networ
udent.
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sent: Tuesday, 31 May 2016 1:00 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Apple pulls Airport routers, possible refresh coming
Agreed, I used an M5 rocket as
Eu-bloody-reka!
http://www.chriscolotti.us/technology/apple-airports-dirty-little-secret/
Recent firmware that supports extending guest networks to extender AirPort base
stations do so using VLAN 1003. Awesome. So I can do the whole Internet-only
guest networks thing even without a primary Ai
eme?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Simon F
>
>
> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kawal Gucukoglu
> Sent: Monday, 30 May 2016 8:43 AM
> To: Macvisionaries
> Subject: Re: Apple pulls Airport routers, possible
onday, 30 May 2016 4:24 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Apple pulls Airport routers, possible refresh coming
>
> By the way, if you want enterprise features like that for non enterprise
> prices, hell even lower than Apple prices check out Ubiquiti Unifi access
great stuff and reasonably priced
and very easy to use
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sent: Monday, 30 May 2016 4:24 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Apple pulls Airport ro
[mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Kawal Gucukoglu
Sent: Monday, 30 May 2016 8:43 AM
To: Macvisionaries
Subject: Re: Apple pulls Airport routers, possible refresh coming
I love my Airport Extreme as I told my ISP that I’d not use their routers as I
had bad experience with another ISP provider
: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Kevin Barry
Sent: Sunday, 29 May 2016 5:18 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Apple pulls Airport routers, possible refresh coming
I have an airport extreme, it is not all that it's cracked up
acvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 9:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: Apple pulls Airport routers, possible refresh coming
>>
>> For one, there is no provision for quality of service. It is a router
>> designed to be simple to set up and run. It do
By the way, if you want enterprise features like that for non enterprise
prices, hell even lower than Apple prices check out Ubiquiti Unifi access
points.
http://www.ubnt.com
they are about $100 or so per unit and support all sorts of protocols including
AC, they support captive portal, roaming
pple pulls Airport routers, possible refresh coming
Yeah, I’m with Tim here. There are of course competitors, but to me, speed
isn’t everything and you can more than make up for any potential
inflexibility in the router part of the AirPort by just using it as a pure
bridging access-point, at which
's crossed somewhere, possibly
even Time Warner in this old building.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Barry
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: Apple pulls Airport routers, possible refresh coming
For one, there is n
I love my Airport Extreme as I told my ISP that I’d not use their routers as I
had bad experience with another ISP provider with their Router and so when I
moved to my current provider, I was determined to use my own equipment as
normally in the past, I’d not get good performance with an ISP Rou
Yeah, I’m with Tim here. There are of course competitors, but to me, speed
isn’t everything and you can more than make up for any potential inflexibility
in the router part of the AirPort by just using it as a pure bridging
access-point, at which it’s very good. The only thing I wish they’d br
Hi,
In our tests, albeit not exhaustive nor extremely intricate, it was primarily
the commercial AP's like Cisco, that out performed our Extremes. I'll also
admit that these tests were two or so years ago, so there may have been others
that surpassed the Extreme. As a home network unit, I'd s
For one, there is no provision for quality of service. It is a router
designed to be simple to set up and run. It does that but at the expense of
losing options. If you are familiar with these sorts of devices I should
not have to tell you this. As for reasonable speeds, that depends on what
you de
Hi,
Limited in which respect? I've not experienced these sorts of crashes that
you're speaking of and had much more reliable and better performance than many
other products. Have also set numerous ones up in schools where classes of
students were accessing them without issue and with reasonab
I have an airport extreme, it is not all that it's cracked up to be. Aside
from its deliberately limited ability to customize, the app on my iPhone
often crashes, and it repeatedly asks me to enter my password, even during
the same session.
In addition, it was never that competitive as far as range
Well I hope it’s not that they’re leaving the market, that’s for sure. I only
recently had the dubious honour of setting up a Netgear Wi-Fi extender, and
wish it had been an AirPort. A new one is not off the cards for me.
--
The following information is important for all members of the Mac Vi
20 matches
Mail list logo
