, 2010 2:59 PM
Subject: Used an iPad today
I'd ordered the 3G model, so will be waiting a few more weeks yet, but I had
some time to play with a WiFi model today.
Generally, it's an iPhone. However, besides the screen size being increased,
the interface has increased in complexity, also
Subject: Used an iPad today
I'd ordered the 3G model, so will be waiting a few more weeks yet, but I had
some time to play with a WiFi model today.
Generally, it's an iPhone. However, besides the screen size being increased,
the interface has increased in complexity, also. Apple
2010 6:24 a.m.
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Well stated, as always, John!
Olivia
On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:44 AM, John Panarese wrote:
Actually, as has been said several times, it is not over priced. For
those who believe this to be the case
: Used an iPad today
Yep, and your iPhone will have a much smaller screen, and won't be able to
run the same software the same way with as much power.
Right now, people are making their iPhone apps run on the iPad. Eventually,
though, the new iPad apps will need to be scaled down in order to be ported
...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of olivia norman
Sent: Thursday, 8 April 2010 6:24 a.m.
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Well stated, as always, John!
Olivia
On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:44 AM, John Panarese wrote:
Actually, as has been said several times
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of olivia norman
Sent: Thursday, 8 April 2010 6:24 a.m.
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Well stated, as always, John!
Olivia
On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:44 AM, John Panarese wrote:
Actually, as has been said
on.
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of olivia norman
Sent: Thursday, 8 April 2010 6:24 a.m.
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Well stated, as always, John!
Olivia
On Apr 7
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Well stated, as always, John!
Olivia
On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:44 AM, John Panarese wrote:
Actually, as has been said several times, it is not over priced. For
those who believe this to be the case, unfortunately, you still are not
getting what the iPad
was amazed
to find them completed and ready to use. I never got into web browsing with
the iPhone.
- Original Message -
From: Vic vtsa...@gmail.com
To: MacVisionaries macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Hi,
We have an iPad
: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:59 PM
Subject: Used an iPad today
I'd ordered the 3G model, so will be waiting a few more weeks yet, but I had
some time to play with a WiFi model today.
Generally, it's an iPhone. However, besides the screen size being increased,
the interface has increased
I just love my iPad, but I'm a total sucker for the latest apple products! :)
Now that they've made everything accessible I think that there will be those of
us who want the latest apple stuff, just like our sighted peers who are also
apple fanatics. :)
Does anyone really need an iPad? perhaps
...@gmail.com
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Hi,
I am surprised that you feel that the iPad is over priced. It seems to me
that Apple has really made a place for themselves in the lower priced
devices with the introduction
to the Software big brother Apple wants me
to have.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Carter nc5rn...@gmail.com
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Hi,
I am surprised that you feel that the iPad is over priced
Yes, makes a lot of sense to me. iWork is indeed a great deal on the iPad.
Olivia
On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Scott Howell wrote:
And do you have evidence that Apple will rape you at the App Counter? I
think offering the iWork suite for the iPad at $10 per app is a very fair
price. I am
not limited to the Software big brother Apple wants me
to have.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Carter nc5rn...@gmail.com
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Hi,
I am surprised that you feel that the iPad
.
Sorry to get off topic
- Original Message - From: Karen Lewellen
klewel...@shellworld.net
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
It does seem like a fine deal.
But, what can you now do with an ipad that you could not do
- Original Message -=20
From: Robert Carter nc5rn...@gmail.com
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
=20
=20
Hi,
=20
I am surprised that you feel that the iPad is over priced. It seems to me=
=20
that Apple has really
Message -
From: Robert Carter nc5rn...@gmail.com
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Hi,
I am surprised that you feel that the iPad is over priced. It seems to me
that Apple has really made a place
to the iPhone.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Cody
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:25 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Also consider how often wifi will be available
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
I think the idea is awesome in terms of accessibility and apple will certainly
get praises for that which they deserve, however I think the product itself is
a rip off. sure, it's $499, but then they plan to rape you at the app counter,
so yeah it's accessible
Seems like the smart people are making universal apps. This is what everyone
should do.
From: bryansm...@bryansmart.com
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:47:00 -0400
Subject: RE: Used an iPad today
Yep, and your iPhone will have a much smaller screen
: Used an iPad today
Seems like the smart people are making universal apps. This is what everyone
should do.
From: bryansm...@bryansmart.com
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:47:00 -0400
Subject: RE: Used an iPad today
Yep, and your iPhone
were to buy an iMac
- Original Message -
From: Blake Sinnett
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: Used an iPad today
Seems like the smart people are making universal apps. This is what everyone
should do.
From: bryansm
: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:59 PM
Subject: Used an iPad today
I'd ordered the 3G model, so will be waiting a few more weeks yet, but I had
some time to play with a WiFi model today.
Generally, it's an iPhone. However, besides the screen size being increased,
the interface has increased
That is exactly what I'm saying.
- Original Message -
From: carlene knight ckni...@knight-toolworks.com
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
I think that what Cody is referring too is the price of the apps
I'd ordered the 3G model, so will be waiting a few more weeks yet, but I had
some time to play with a WiFi model today.
Generally, it's an iPhone. However, besides the screen size being increased,
the interface has increased in complexity, also. Apple is certainly using the
extra space to
Interesting. I find portrait mode works better I considered the 3g
version, but thought I didn't need both that and an iPhone.
Olivia
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Bryan Smart bryansm...@bryansmart.com
wrote:
I'd ordered the 3G model, so will be waiting a few more weeks
: Used an iPad today
I'd ordered the 3G model, so will be waiting a few more weeks yet, but I had
some time to play with a WiFi model today.
Generally, it's an iPhone. However, besides the screen size being increased,
the interface has increased in complexity, also. Apple is certainly using
olivianor...@gmail.com
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Interesting. I find portrait mode works better I considered the 3g
version, but thought I didn't need both that and an iPhone.
Olivia
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2010
: Used an iPad today
I'd ordered the 3G model, so will be waiting a few more weeks yet, but I had
some time to play with a WiFi model today.
Generally, it's an iPhone. However, besides the screen size being increased,
the interface has increased in complexity, also. Apple is certainly
: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Hi,
I am surprised that you feel that the iPad is over priced. It seems to me
that Apple has really made a place for themselves in the lower priced
devices with the introduction of the iPad. I personally think the price is
impressive
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Cody
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:24 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
I think the idea is awesome in terms of accessibility and apple will
certainly get praises for that which they deserve, however I think
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:09 PM
Subject: RE: Used an iPad today
Why you say ATT is going to rip you at the counter. As I understand it you
can get it with or without a data plan and the data plan does not as of
now
have to be a contract. I understand
And do you have evidence that Apple will rape you at the App Counter? I
think offering the iWork suite for the iPad at $10 per app is a very fair
price. I am not sure what developers will charge for their apps exactly, but I
gather the prices will not be substantially different than what is
It does seem like a fine deal.
But, what can you now do with an ipad that you could not do with any other
apple tool you already own? That is for those who own many.
Not being provocative, just wondering.
When I consider investing in a new technical tool it is because there is
something I
06, 2010 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
It does seem like a fine deal.
But, what can you now do with an ipad that you could not do with any other
apple tool you already own? That is for those who own many.
Not being provocative, just wondering.
When I consider investing in a new technical
36 matches
Mail list logo
