On nie 15 kwi 2012 18:53:15 CEST, quim@nokia.com wrote:
3) Get a permanent licence grant for maemo.org to ship Nokia binaries
(e.g. flasher, firmware) and use them in the build process (SDKs in
autobuilder and COBS). This would have practical advantage and
requires formalising
On śro 18 kwi 2012 21:34:06 CEST, Quim Gil quim@nokia.com wrote:
I'm not holding my breath. Third party components might have been
developed by subcontractors under certain premises, making things even
more complicated. Aging tech also means older contracts handled by
people not
szopin created thread on TMO, where he (and other people) list packages in
repositories, that contain roadblock errors (many times for ages, some of them
even passed QA). Most of them require only simple fixes, but maintainers are
away etc.
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=83932
---
As
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=83939
Another example of situation, that shouldn't occur in any case - unrelated
package uploaded to community repos, that cause overwrite over crucial SSU
package. And, despite few initial comments, it *is* actually harmful.
Sure, this mess is mainly due
I completely agree, but wasn't sure that such solution (Council member applying
for device can get one, but don't participate in deciding) won't end up in
protest.
I'm glad to hear, that it's natural and no-problem for everyone (at least here).
On pią 25 maj 2012 11:23:52 CEST, Timo Härkönen timop.harko...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yep. please join in. The meetings are held every monday @ 15:00 UTC
wiki task page for the obs work here:
http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Maemo_OBS
-Timo
Thanks Timo, Council's representatives will join you
On pią 01 cze 2012 05:59:57 CEST, Qole qole.tab...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, _vi, you are like the Dr. Gregory House of TMO.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Paul Sleggs psle...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually LOL'ed on that... Should contain warning not safe for reading in bed
@ 6:28 AM, risk of
And how is that related to program being GPL'ed, yet, with sources lacking?
BTW, qgil already assigned this to himself and is trying to get answer on
proper channels.
As for Your backup idea, never heard of backupmenu, eh?
/Estel
On pią 01 cze 2012 05:34:10 CEST, misterc
Thanks a lot for info and fair play approach. It's really appreciated.
/Estel
On czw 14 cze 2012 10:35:57 CEST, Arto Jalkanen ajalk...@gmail.com wrote:
I got accepted to the Qt 5 Mobile Projects program, so I'm withdrawing my
submission in the community awards.
There is no delay, Marco - submissions are accepted until 00:00 UTC. Hoever,
Your submission lack basic fields required to be valid - like link to Your
maemo.org and TMO accounts.
Please, fix it before deadline.
/Estel
On nie 17 cze 2012 17:19:12 CEST, AllBoutN9 i...@allboutn9.info wrote:
On wto 10 lip 2012 18:06:32 CEST, robert bauer nyba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
In order to continue the community at www.maemo.org in the future, it
will be necessary to migrate much of the infrastructure and associated
elements to a new site and to establish a separate entity for that
---BeginMessage---
On wto 10 lip 2012 18:06:32 CEST, robert bauer nyba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
In order to continue the community at www.maemo.org in the future, it
will be necessary to migrate much of the infrastructure and associated
elements to a new site and to establish a separate
We don't have any jurisdiction over Mer, Jolla, and similar efforts
(fortunately). Bylaws doesn't exclude collaboration - or even merging, if
approriate - with such projects, but base goal is continuation of support for
user of Maemo flavors (incl. Harmattan).
/Estel
On śro 11 lip 2012
On czw 27 wrz 2012 08:49:20 CEST, and...@bleb.org wrote:
Hi,
If there are no candidates, thr election period is eztended by a month.
If there are still insufficient candidates, it's up to the outgoong
council and the Nokia Community Manager (assuming we still have one) to
decide how to
On czw 27 wrz 2012 12:34:53 CEST, Lucas Maneos ma...@subs.maneos.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:42:44AM +0200, twilight...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I see lack of candidates for Maemo Council as obvious
thing - after all, we're going to have Board of Directors, which, for
all
Is there a decision about extending Board election, too? Wasn't it mean to run
election for both bodies + referendum about bylaws, at the same time?
/Estel
On wto 09 paź 2012 21:27:17 CEST, Craig Woodward wo...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
As per a clarification of miscommunication within the
to incorporate a few minor changes relating to election
rules to clarify issues like the ones we just had.
Many thanks to those who have commented and continue to improve on them.
-Craig
twilight...@gmail.com twilight...@gmail.com wrote:
=
Is there a decision about
According to edit appended to this post:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=1282399postcount=120
...Radall stepped down from Board, just after end of election. It was kindly
brought to our attention by lma, here:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=1282803postcount=9
...and outcome here:
Unfortunately, none of propositions for handling such situation got
incorporated into bylaws, and only proposition that Council have, is stretching
the rules.
I think, that it's clearly unfair to do so, in case of *negative* Randall's
example - when, just a while ago, we disagreed to bend
We (well, I) don't. But if they are wrong, and the law forbids any
non-voice conferencing, it seems quite discriminatory to me (for
instance it means no one with a speech or hearing disability can serve
on the board) and I'm surprised it hasn't been challenged.
In light of this, are we
On pią 09 lis 2012 10:23:07 CET, Ryan Abel rabe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:36 AM, Piotr Jawidzyk twilight...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/8, Community Council: Ivan Galvez Junquera coun...@maemo.org:
By Tim Samoff, chairman of the Hildon Foundation Board.
Because
On sob 10 lis 2012 03:12:49 CET, Craig Woodward wo...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
Can we please, for the love of all things holy, stop beating this dead
horse?
Hope you don't mean Council or maemo...
One of the larger things Council can do, frankly, is filter out the
noise. The Board is not
, that
by yesterday decret, TMO moderators are keeping order on mailing list too,
and I will accept any ban on mailing list, for writing above (/harmless joke).
/Estel
On sob 10 lis 2012 10:32:16 CET, Ruediger Gad r@gmx.de wrote:
On 11/10/2012 08:40 AM, twilight...@gmail.com wrote
On sob 10 lis 2012 14:03:30 CET, Andre Klapper andre_klap...@gmx.net wrote:
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 11:36 +0100, twilight...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, even simply writing, that practice of candidating to Council and
asking people, don't vote for me (instead of revoking own candidacy
- to support
On pon 12 lis 2012 14:22:55 CET, Fvghgtfrde Fdesfggtfrdefgtfrde
blowthest...@yahoo.com wrote:
By advice of helping soul from IRC and Estell (thanks, man!), i'm
sending my rant here: what the hell is happening with maemo.org forum?!
Today, one moment i'm posting, and two hours later i see
Ps.
I have asked peterleinchen to post small annoucement in my black aluminum body
replacement thread.
He agreed, but now I'm not sure if he should do it. Will he also be banned (and
his hundreds of posts deleted indiscriminately), just because of this?
Thanks in advance, our wanna-be
On pon 12 lis 2012 14:58:00 CET, Reggie Suplido reg...@internettablettalk.com
wrote:
Stop playing with community man. Here's the proof:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A7gWTNeCMAAyhVX.png
Laughable. Why you have masked rest of IP? Show it.
Those two first numbers are IP range of (one of) largest
On pon 12 lis 2012 14:58:00 CET, Reggie Suplido reg...@internettablettalk.com
wrote:
Stop playing with community man. Here's the proof:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A7gWTNeCMAAyhVX.png
Another thing about this pathetic incident - I see few other names listed
there. While Letsee was my account
On pon 12 lis 2012 16:20:25 CET, Ilya Skriblovsky ilyaskriblov...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Just want to add some fresh opinion to this horrible flame. It's fresh
because I don't really know the background: I don't know why Estel was
banned and why it is so opposite to the Council.
(Though
Ps.
It was my last message on this matter, so sorry JCDentom, that you got
problems, even if its not my fault.
I'm disgusted by even thinking of participating in such corrupted, rotten, and
hopeless place, as TMO turned to be in just one day.
If my foot will ever step there again, it will be
---BeginMessage---
On pon 12 lis 2012 20:37:56 CET, Marcin Mielniczuk marmis...@linux.pl wrote:
I have been banned due to, exactly, this post:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=1287822postcount=48
What? You were banned because you said your opinion about candidation?
Don't we have the
---BeginMessage---
On pon 12 lis 2012 15:12:14 CET, Mohammad Abu-Garbeyyeh
mohammad7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 12, 2012 4:09 PM, twilight...@gmail.com twilight...@gmail.com
wrote:
On pon 12 lis 2012 14:58:00 CET, Reggie Suplido
reg...@internettablettalk.com wrote:
Stop playing
---BeginMessage---
On pon 12 lis 2012 21:32:18 CET, Andre Klapper andre_klap...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 20:01 +0100, twilight...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been banned due to, exactly, this post:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=1287822postcount=48
It has been mentioned
On pon 12 lis 2012 22:33:14 CET, Cosimo Kroll zehjot...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just had to clarify:
Estel did not leave council on his own purpose. He was politely asked to
leave because he ordered parts for his private CNC machine via councils
.org mail-address without asking the rest of
From the whole conversation (minus personal attacks), we have a clear picture
of one person having too much control over Maemo infrastructure, paired with
unresponsible/unpredictable behavior.
Cutting the whose fault it is part, the real question is: Can Community fix
it now, or Maemo infra
Post scriptum, for anyone too lazy to check sources:
On Sat Oct 18 20:39:26 2014 Peter Leinchen peterleinc...@t-online.de wrote:
http://maemo.org/community/council/2014-10-14_meeting_minutes/
Topic (DocScrutinizer/joerg_rw stepped down from Council!):
* Joerg kept quiet and did not see the
In case anyone missed it, buried under fanboys screaming - my point is that
Community DESERVES honesty from people representing it. Just because., but
also because those that doesn't know history are doomed to repeat it, or so the
say. It apply to our small-scale Maemo's history, too.
People
While I don't mind (clearly, invaluable) input from long-absent individuals,
that neither had anything to do nor have any idea about the problem at hand - I
would still like to get some official answer from the person responsible for
annoucement - why, in the thin line between diplomatic and
38 matches
Mail list logo
