Le samedi 11 février 2012 05:07:07, David Walser a écrit :
Sticking to the ESR will mean less work for the distro, less stress for
sysadmins, and less pain for users. It seems like an obvious choice.
+1
Let's only face the speed at which we manage to build/test/push FF10 this
days... there
On 9 February 2012 11:33, D.Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com wrote:
I doubt that we will lose any (or many) users interested in the latest
version, as all distros will be faced with this time lag relative to
upstream.
I would suggests to stuck on cauldron to version 10.x and in mageia 1
too and
09.02.2012 13:35, AL13N kirjutas:
ihmo, the users who want the latest versions will not even wait one week,
and will grab them from upstream. If we really wanted the latest release,
someone could backport them.
And backports work since what time?
the end users will benefit too, because the
Op donderdag 09 februari 2012 13:04:00 schreef Sander Lepik:
09.02.2012 13:35, AL13N kirjutas:
ihmo, the users who want the latest versions will not even wait one week,
and will grab them from upstream. If we really wanted the latest release,
someone could backport them.
And backports
Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op maandag 06 februari 2012 08:50:21 schreef Sander Lepik:
06.02.2012 09:38, Funda Wang kirjutas:
And, don't forget, we still have a package named firefox-beta. If we
stick with FF10, then some day we will come to a situation of
firefox-10.0.4 and
Op maandag 06 februari 2012 08:50:21 schreef Sander Lepik:
06.02.2012 09:38, Funda Wang kirjutas:
And, don't forget, we still have a package named firefox-beta. If we
stick with FF10, then some day we will come to a situation of
firefox-10.0.4 and firefox-beta-15b1 for Mageia 2, which is
I would suggest another support policy.
* For cauldron, we always have latest versions of firefox and thunderbird,
no matter whether it is ESR.
* For released distros, we always update it till next ESR. i.e., for Mageia
1, we will have FF 9.0.1, 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.0.2, 10.0.3, but not 11.0. If
06.02.2012 04:07, Funda Wang kirjutas:
I would suggest another support policy.
* For cauldron, we always have latest versions of firefox and
thunderbird, no matter whether it is ESR.
* For released distros, we always update it till next ESR. i.e., for
Mageia 1, we will have FF 9.0.1, 10.0,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Sander Lepik sander.le...@eesti.ee wrote:
06.02.2012 04:07, Funda Wang kirjutas:
I would suggest another support policy.
* For cauldron, we always have latest versions of firefox and thunderbird,
no matter whether it is ESR.
* For released distros, we
Then we will have 13.0, 14.0, 15.0, 16.0, 17.0, 17.0.1, 17.0.2 for Mageia
2. Personally, as an average user, I tend to delete system FF 10, if there
is FF13 elsewhere. I'm afraid most users think the same. Of course, I could
be wrong.
在 2012-2-6 下午3:03，Sander Lepik sander.le...@eesti.ee写道：
The key is, we always have the latest series of supported product line from
upstream, neither latest version nor latest supported version.
And, such an update policy is based on the imagination of 70% of Mageia 2
users will upgrade to Mageia 3 immediately when released.
在 2012-2-6 上午10:07，Funda
And, don't forget, we still have a package named firefox-beta. If we stick
with FF10, then some day we will come to a situation of firefox-10.0.4 and
firefox-beta-15b1 for Mageia 2, which is unacceptable. Or, we should make
an exception on firefox-beta, it should be obsoleted by updated firefox
06.02.2012 09:38, Funda Wang kirjutas:
And, don't forget, we still have a package named firefox-beta. If we
stick with FF10, then some day we will come to a situation of
firefox-10.0.4 and firefox-beta-15b1 for Mageia 2, which is
unacceptable. Or, we should make an exception on firefox-beta,
Am 15.01.2012 01:43, schrieb Luc Menut:
Le 13/01/2012 02:22, D.Morgan a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Maarten Vanraesal...@rmail.be wrote:
see https://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-mozilla-firefox-
extended-support-release/
see
Luc Menut a écrit :
Le 13/01/2012 02:22, D.Morgan a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Maarten Vanraesal...@rmail.be wrote:
see
https://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-mozilla-firefox-
extended-support-release/
see
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Sander Lepik sander.le...@eesti.ee wrote:
13.01.2012 03:20, Maarten Vanraes kirjutas:
see https://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-mozilla-firefox-
extended-support-release/
see https://wiki.mozilla.org/images/9/9d/Esr-release-overview.png
ESR
On 13/01/12 09:36, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Sander Lepik wrote:
13.01.2012 03:20, Maarten Vanraes kirjutas:
see https://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-mozilla-firefox-
extended-support-release/
see https://wiki.mozilla.org/images/9/9d/Esr-release-overview.png
Le vendredi 13 janvier 2012 à 11:21 +, Claire Robinson a écrit :
On 13/01/12 09:36, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Sander Lepik wrote:
13.01.2012 03:20, Maarten Vanraes kirjutas:
see https://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-mozilla-firefox-
On 13/01/12 11:37, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 13 janvier 2012 à 11:21 +, Claire Robinson a écrit :
On 13/01/12 09:36, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Sander Lepik wrote:
13.01.2012 03:20, Maarten Vanraes kirjutas:
see
From: Claire Robinson m...@gmail.com
To: mageia-dev@mageia.org
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR = we should totally go for this wrt
stable releases
On 13/01/12 11:37, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 13
Le vendredi 13 janvier 2012 à 05:13 -0800, Chris Evans a écrit :
This really doesn't make sense. The browser is our interface to the
internet. I (as a user) feel a need to have the latest version of my
browser complete with all security patches.
What do you think that a long supported
Chris Evans a écrit :
*From:* Claire Robinson m...@gmail.com
*To:* mageia-dev@mageia.org
*Sent:* Friday, January 13, 2012 6:45 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR = we should totally go for
this wrt stable
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:00 AM, andre999 andre999...@laposte.net wrote:
Wait.
A long-term release version is kept updated for bugs, particularly
security bugs, but doesn't add new features.
Since it doesn't add new features, it is less likely to introduce new
bugs, and so would be more
13.01.2012 23:20, Maarten Vanraes kirjutas:
look at the picture for the support period, the 1y warranteed versions cross
over for 2 or 3 months
so it's going to fit for as long as we have 9m release schedule
9m release schedule, but aren't we giving support for 18m?
--
Sander
Op vrijdag 13 januari 2012 22:34:39 schreef Sander Lepik:
13.01.2012 23:20, Maarten Vanraes kirjutas:
look at the picture for the support period, the 1y warranteed versions
cross over for 2 or 3 months
so it's going to fit for as long as we have 9m release schedule
9m release
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be wrote:
Op vrijdag 13 januari 2012 20:59:19 schreef Jeff Robins:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:00 AM, andre999 andre999...@laposte.net
wrote:
Wait.
A long-term release version is kept updated for bugs, particularly
security
Op vrijdag 13 januari 2012 23:10:53 schreef Jeff Robins:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be wrote:
Op vrijdag 13 januari 2012 20:59:19 schreef Jeff Robins:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:00 AM, andre999 andre999...@laposte.net
wrote:
Wait.
A long-term
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be wrote:
your logic is flawed
Yes it was.
When I read the text I was thinking of a new FF ESR every year, with an
extra 2-3months of support, after the new one is released. The graphic
makes it pretty clear that it's a new FF
Op zaterdag 14 januari 2012 01:10:48 schreef Jeff Robins:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be wrote:
your logic is flawed
Yes it was.
When I read the text I was thinking of a new FF ESR every year, with an
extra 2-3months of support, after the new one is
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be wrote:
Op zaterdag 14 januari 2012 01:10:48 schreef Jeff Robins:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be wrote:
your logic is flawed
Yes it was.
When I read the text I was thinking of a new FF
see https://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-mozilla-firefox-
extended-support-release/
see https://wiki.mozilla.org/images/9/9d/Esr-release-overview.png
ESR is a 1y extended supported release...
looking at the image we'd be having supported versions for our 9month release
schedule
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Maarten Vanraes al...@rmail.be wrote:
see https://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-mozilla-firefox-
extended-support-release/
see https://wiki.mozilla.org/images/9/9d/Esr-release-overview.png
ESR is a 1y extended supported release...
looking at
13.01.2012 03:20, Maarten Vanraes kirjutas:
see https://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-mozilla-firefox-
extended-support-release/
see https://wiki.mozilla.org/images/9/9d/Esr-release-overview.png
ESR is a 1y extended supported release...
looking at the image we'd be having
33 matches
Mail list logo
