Le samedi 10 décembre 2011 à 12:14 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
You're explaining why having orphan packages is bad and it's hard to
disagree,
but I fail to see why such a mailing list for people who are ready to devote
some time to orphan packages would make things worse. It's not
Op woensdag 14 december 2011 23:19:40 schreef Michael Scherer:
Le samedi 10 décembre 2011 à 12:14 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
You're explaining why having orphan packages is bad and it's hard to
disagree, but I fail to see why such a mailing list for people who are
ready to devote
Le jeudi 15 décembre 2011 à 00:14 +0100, nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
So let's try to make a proposal, if there is a list, after how many
months should a package be removed from the repository if not maintained
( and by maintained, I do not say
Le jeudi 15 décembre 2011 00:28:05, Manuel Hiebel a écrit :
And what to do with package that have a maintainer, but the packager
does not fix the bugs or is inactive ? :D
Just say here : Houston, we've got a problem! ;-)
15.12.2011 01:28, Manuel Hiebel kirjutas:
And what to do with package that have a maintainer, but the packager
does not fix the bugs or is inactive ? :D
List them here.. lets make a wall of blame :)
--
Sander
'Twas brillig, and Samuel Verschelde at 10/12/11 11:14 did gyre and gimble:
Le samedi 10 décembre 2011 11:14:38, Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le jeudi 08 décembre 2011 à 18:51 +0800, Funda Wang a écrit :
I would suggest that registering nobody as a mailing list, so that
every interested packagers
Le jeudi 08 décembre 2011 à 18:51 +0800, Funda Wang a écrit :
2011/12/8 Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net:
His/her work would be the following:
- identifiy (with bugsquad's help) the orphan packages that have lots of
unresolved bugs or are severely outdated,
- do the same for packages
Le samedi 10 décembre 2011 11:14:38, Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le jeudi 08 décembre 2011 à 18:51 +0800, Funda Wang a écrit :
I would suggest that registering nobody as a mailing list, so that
every interested packagers could join to help.
No.
For the reasons already highlighted several
Le samedi 10 décembre 2011 12:14:56, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le samedi 10 décembre 2011 11:14:38, Michael Scherer a écrit :
A free-for-all pool is just a mess.
You're explaining why having orphan packages is bad and it's hard to
disagree, but I fail to see why such a mailing list for
Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le jeudi 8 décembre 2011 11:51:46, Funda Wang a écrit :
2011/12/8 Samuel Verscheldesto...@laposte.net:
His/her work would be the following:
- identifiy (with bugsquad's help) the orphan packages that have lots of
unresolved bugs or are severely outdated,
-
On 08/12/11 10:04, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
Hi,
I consider the (first phase of) the adoption campaign finished, so here are
some
stats about it, and an opening for discussion about what to do next.
We had 4931 packages without a maintainer, we now have 2043, so I think we
can
say
Hi,
I consider the (first phase of) the adoption campaign finished, so here are
some
stats about it, and an opening for discussion about what to do next.
We had 4931 packages without a maintainer, we now have 2043, so I think we can
say that the campaign was a success in this regard : nearly
2011/12/8 Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net:
His/her work would be the following:
- identifiy (with bugsquad's help) the orphan packages that have lots of
unresolved bugs or are severely outdated,
- do the same for packages that have a maintainer but are in a similar
situation,
- try to
W dniu 08.12.2011 11:04, Samuel Verschelde pisze:
Hi,
I consider the (first phase of) the adoption campaign finished, so here are some
stats about it, and an opening for discussion about what to do next.
We had 4931 packages without a maintainer, we now have 2043, so I think we can
say that
Le jeudi 8 décembre 2011 12:33:28, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
Hello, I just inform that I was collecting the data for this action, the
stats are here http://kamil.mageia.org.pl/MageiaStats/ it says about the
daily ration of the maintained and the unmaintained packages + how many
full-packagers
Le jeudi 8 décembre 2011 11:51:46, Funda Wang a écrit :
2011/12/8 Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net:
His/her work would be the following:
- identifiy (with bugsquad's help) the orphan packages that have lots of
unresolved bugs or are severely outdated,
- do the same for packages that
Le jeudi 8 décembre 2011 13:14:26, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le jeudi 8 décembre 2011 11:51:46, Funda Wang a écrit :
2011/12/8 Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net:
His/her work would be the following:
- identifiy (with bugsquad's help) the orphan packages that have lots
of
W dniu 08.12.2011 13:13, Samuel Verschelde pisze:
Before we start to do that, do you remember about these words:
Currently the data about ownership of packages is tracked in
http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/data/maintdb.txt and umaintined packages are
listed in
See http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/data/unmaintained.txt for the list of
orphan packages.
monodevelop-debugger-gdb
taken.
monodevelop-boo
monodevelop-debugger-mdb
According to monodevelop download page[1]
those two can be removed.
Cheers,
Angelo
[1] http://monodevelop.com/Download
Op donderdag 08 december 2011 13:16:28 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
On second thoughts, the mailing list should not be called nobody but
rather orphanage or something that shows to bug reporters that there are
packagers behind it.
we should call it /dev/null
Op donderdag 08 december 2011 13:13:28 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
[...]
I look into many really abandoned packages, without any interest among
the packagers, and for some of them it's even quite hard to find any
on-line resource.. For example cpuinfo, it's a /proc/* parser for CPU
related
21 matches
Mail list logo
