At 1:03 AM +0200 2004/05/11, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Many customers, who normally only use the net for web and mail, would
prefer a mail being sent from Customer Service, and addressed to their
own address, so that they know the mail was sent to them, and that they
can hit reply to get h
At 1:03 AM +0200 2004/05/11, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Many customers, who normally only use the net for web and mail, would
prefer a mail being sent from Customer Service, and addressed to their
own address, so that they know the mail was sent to them, and that they
can hit reply to get h
> "somuchfun" == somuchfun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
somuchfun> I am literally shocked to see that you think everyone
somuchfun> who does not agree with you is a Spamer!
That's not what he said. He said he can't think of a good reason why
a non-spammer would want to do this, while
At 6:13 PM +0900 2004/05/11, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
FWIW, I agree with you and James. For an announcement list it makes
sense to me that the editor's mailbox would be placed in the From
header, and the alias for mass-mailing not be exposed at all. I think
that would look more "profession
> "Stig" == Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stig> Many customers, who normally only use the net for web and
Stig> mail, would prefer a mail being sent from Customer Service,
Stig> and addressed to their own address, so that they know the
Stig> mail was sent to
I'm on a list which a few weeks ago enabled the anonymous feature to prevent a
spammer from lurking on the list and harvesting addresses. This made it
impossible to sort messages by sender, and several members have complained
about this. The list is not intended to be anonymous. I propose splitt
