On 04/30/2017 04:06 PM, Dean Suhr wrote:
>
> Is there a way to query what email addresses have been sent Confirmation
> messages but not responded/confirmed? Is there a time after which
> unconfirmed subscription requests are purged?
See the script at
Greetings,
We have just set up a new small mailing list where we are very hands on with
invitations to join. We had Confirm and Approve selected … and came to find
that a notable percentage of Confirmation messages went to the user’s SPAM
folders. (This is in spite of them being subscribers
Hi All,
Does mailman support query-based distribution lists like Microsoft Exchange
does? Can someone shed some light on this?
Anup
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
Anup Patwardhan wrote:
Does mailman support query-based distribution lists like Microsoft Exchange
does? Can someone shed some light on this?
Not out of the box, but there is an LDAP MemberAdaptor at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/558106 that can be used to
base list membership on
Hello,
We need to lookup who is not moderated in a list with a large membership.
Is there a simple command line query to handle that?
I have a feeling we looked this up before, but can't find any notes on
it nor previous questions in this support list.
--Donald
D G Teed wrote:
We need to lookup who is not moderated in a list with a large membership.
Is there a simple command line query to handle that?
See
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2010-January/068362.html
--
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers,
San
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
D G Teed wrote:
We need to lookup who is not moderated in a list with a large membership.
Is there a simple command line query to handle that?
See
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2010-January/068362.html
D G Teed wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
D G Teed wrote:
We need to lookup who is not moderated in a list with a large membership.
Is there a simple command line query to handle that?
See
This is really an is my understanding correct question...
Our mail server is getting the snot beat out of it by spambots, and even
though I've turned on pretty aggressive connection rate control and
limiting of the number of concurrent connections from any particular bot,
we still occasionally
Steve Burling wrote:
Our mail server is getting the snot beat out of it by spambots, and even
though I've turned on pretty aggressive connection rate control and
limiting of the number of concurrent connections from any particular bot,
we still occasionally hit sendmail's (configured) limit of
At 2:32 PM +0900 2006-09-01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse me? The GPL *explicitly* approves and authorizes (not to
mention implicitly encourages) modification and redistribution without
conditions other than providing source. That's exactly what license
means.
Right, and they
At 1:39 AM -0500 2006-09-01, Brad Knowles wrote:
If you want to get into a diatribe about licensing, please be aware that
I'm a BSD guy, and I've found myself surrounded by a bunch of GPL types,
so license-wise I've tended to say pretty quiet.
Sorry, I meant ... stay pretty quiet. That
Brad Knowles said the following on 2006/09/01 01:24 AM:
This is the key point that was not coming across to me, at least not
until much later in the exchange. Speaking only for myself, I seriously
misunderstood what you were asking and why, which greatly colored my
responses.
My apologies, I
Brad Knowles said the following on 2006/09/01 08:39 AM:
If you want to get into a diatribe about licensing, please be aware
that I'm a BSD guy, and I've found myself surrounded by a bunch of
GPL types, so license-wise I've tended to say pretty quiet.
Note, the issues raised are not unique to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anybody at Mailman asked CPanel, Plesk, or Apple for source and
been refused? Or one of their customers, and been refused because
they were under NDA? If we haven't asked, how can we bitch?
I asked cPanel a few years
Brad Knowles writes:
I just don't have the answers to the questions you're asking me.
That's fine.
Moreover, I don't think that it's reasonable for you to respond to me
in this manner. What have I ever done to you?
Since you ask, lots of nice things. I've certainly benefited from
your
Todd Zullinger writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anybody at Mailman asked CPanel, Plesk, or Apple for source and
been refused? Or one of their customers, and been refused because
they were under NDA? If we haven't asked, how can we bitch?
[...]
I've since had the displeasure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you actually do have the right to do so, yes, please.
I do, AFAIK. Mailman is GPL'd and I have legitimate root access on
that system so I have access to the source code. AIUI, the GPL
doesn't permit them to restrict
At 9:30 PM +0900 2006-09-01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your post asks for more than the GPL does. I agree that it would be
good if these companies would participate actively in the community.
But I'm more confused than ever why you cited the GPL in support of
that, since you write:
I'm
Todd Zullinger writes:
I do, AFAIK. Mailman is GPL'd and I have legitimate root access on
that system so I have access to the source code. AIUI, the GPL
doesn't permit them to restrict what I do with the source that I
get.
You have to actually receive a distribution to have GPL rights.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to actually receive a distribution to have GPL rights.
Merely having access to somebody else's copy is not enough.
The system owner most certainly allows me to access and use the source
that he was provided as part
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 9:30 PM +0900 2006-09-01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And maybe Mailman should consider asking for source code from these
companies, to improve support for not a few users.
That's a good idea, but that's another issue for Barry.
FWIW, I only this week discovered that
Bretton Vine wrote:
Just as an example, some list-owners have pending administrative request
queues numbering in the hundreds already. No amount of prodding or pushing
or assisting helps them just to complete a small and easy daily task.
Feedback is my prior list didn't bother me with stuff or
Todd Zullinger wrote:
The source dir on cpanel seems to
include a build dir with the mailman bin/ utils in it along with some
of the stuff from contrib and cron.
The build directory is created by configure and contains 'configured'
versions of the scripts.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Todd Zullinger writes:
If you have reason to believe that there are other factors which
would prohibit the system owner from sharing that source code,
feel free to point those out.
There are none to worry about, except that he/she arbitrarily decides
he/she doesn't want to.
I'm just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just concerned that sharing might not be the intention of the
system owner.
No problem. Sharing this source code is perfectly fine with the
system owner. I know him well enough to know that implicitly.
- --
Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brad Knowles wrote:
Looking at
http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.7.ppc/mailman-117/mailman/NEWS,
it looks like they got up to version 2.1.5, but again I'm still
trying to figure out what parts may have been modified by Apple.
On 8/31/06 4:09 PM, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I think either unapproved or unauthorized are the most
appropriate terms. After all, the code is released under the GPL,
and anyone who is making modifications to that code and then making
their modified version available to
At 9:06 AM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
Well a lot has been generated in this discussion already, now it's just a
case of summarising it and having someone edit. I like writing, and would
happily contribute but I can drag on a bit so need a good editor :-P
Yeah, I have that
Brad Knowles writes:
At 2:07 AM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
(locally) it's been referred to as a be strict in what you send, relaxed
in
what you receive approach but not everyone adheres to (or is aware of)
this
way of looking at things and it seems antiquated to
Bretton Vine wrote:
Mark Sapiro said the following on 2006/08/31 02:55 AM:
Do you have an actual message?
Yes
Where did this message come from?
A list-member, cc'd to non-list member (subsequently subbed)
It occurred to me that if the list has archives, the raw message as
sent to the list
John W. Baxter said the following on 2006/08/31 06:58 PM:
And, unfortunately, were I preparing a list of options for a You really
ought to look at these options and check that they are set appropriately
paragraph, I probably wouldn't include this one. There are so many which
are more
Bretton Vine sent the message below at 10:08 8/31/2006:
John W. Baxter said the following on 2006/08/31 06:58 PM:
And, unfortunately, were I preparing a list of options for a You really
ought to look at these options and check that they are set appropriately
paragraph, I probably wouldn't
--On August 31, 2006 7:08:22 PM +0200 Bretton Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Perhaps a list of you /really/ should set these settings to X would be
useful to people short on time :-) Of course you could just bundle the
product that way in the first place but where's the fun in that?
To which
Dragon said the following on 2006/08/31 07:44 PM:
But if you don't like the defaults or have a reason to choose a
different setting, you can change them at your own risk either through
configuring each list or by overriding the setting in mm_cfg.py
I'm not criticising, and I'm more than
Dragon said the following on 2006/08/31 07:44 PM:
The fact that people like Brad and Mark and others are willing to expend
large amounts of their time responding to queries here should be taken as
what it is, another gift to the community. I think they have gone above
and beyond the call of
Steve Burling said the following on 2006/08/31 07:55 PM:
Could we maybe leave this poor dead horse to rest in peace?
Only if I get a last word in edgewise :-)
Apparently, many of the posters to this list believe (with some
justification, imho) that it should take explicit action to undo safe
At 10:06 AM -0700 2006-08-31, John W. Baxter quoted Brad Knowles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We're not a commercial environment, and we've actually had pretty bad
experiences with people/companies that are in commercial environments
taking our software and making unapproved modifications to it, or
At 8:44 PM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
The point I was illustrating is that if you have to justify the rationale
behind a default setting to a third-party-decision-maker -- what is the most
appropriate and concise response?
This is the key point that was not coming across to me,
At 8:25 PM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
I view it differently. I have had great feedback and I highly doubt either
of the parties mentioned viewed a response as a restraining, difficult
exercise. I /really/ use lists to their full advantage and with some in
particular have never
Brad Knowles writes:
At 10:06 AM -0700 2006-08-31, John W. Baxter quoted Brad Knowles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We're not a commercial environment, and we've actually had pretty bad
experiences with people/companies that are in commercial environments
taking our software and making
Setup: Debian AMD64 (mix testing/stable), Exim 4.62, Mailman 2.1.8 from
source (with patch to allow @listname in allowed posters), multiple
installations of Mailman (one instance of MM per virtual domain)
In the last 24 hours we've had the same situation occur with two corporate
Dragon said the following on 2006/08/30 10:03 PM:
Oops... forgot to send my reply to the list too. Sorry about that
Bretton, I did not mean for you to receive it twice.
Not a problem, and thanks for the reply ;-)
However it doesn't solve my problem of determining why a
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Bretton Vine sent the message below at 14:22 8/30/2006:
Dragon said the following on 2006/08/30 10:03 PM:
Oops... forgot to send my reply to the list too. Sorry about that
Bretton, I did not mean for you to receive it twice.
Not a problem, and thanks for the reply ;-)
However it doesn't solve
At 11:22 PM +0200 2006-08-30, Bretton Vine wrote:
(no criticism intended to developers, but I have to ask:)
Was this requested by users; were users involved in this decision; or was it
a case of developers deciding for users what they thought was best given the
environment of email/lists
At 8:12 PM +0200 2006-08-30, Bretton Vine wrote:
Now when I test the following I /don't/ get the error.
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which brings to mind an obvious possibility, but this being what it is that
isn't one that can be entertained. (heads must roll!
Bretton Vine wrote:
I repeat, no criticism intended, I just need to be able to give a complete
answer and am anticipating the questions I'll be asked. :-)
I think most of what I'm going to say here has been said by Dragon and
Brad already, but just for emphasis...
The major reason for
Dragon said the following on 2006/08/31 12:24 AM:
I just tested this on one of my lists. I sent an e-mail with the To: set
to one of my other e-mail addresses and the CC: set to my list address.
snip
It worked as advertised when I had it enabled.
I can confirm my own testing duplicates this.
Brad Knowles said the following on 2006/08/31 12:09 AM:
snip useful comments
We prefer to have this option default to on, because it is safer that
way, and people can always choose to set their choice to be more
permissive.
(locally) it's been referred to as a be strict in what you send,
Mark Sapiro said the following on 2006/08/31 01:22 AM:
Whatever is chosen as the Defaults.py value for any particular list
setting, some will wish it had been the other way. It is simply not
possible to create out of the box defaults that will satisfy
everyone. That is why a site can change
Bretton Vine wrote:
Mark Sapiro said the following on 2006/08/31 01:22 AM:
Thus of your 3 examples above, if 'list' is the list posting address
that Mailman expects to see, only the 3rd example will be held for
implicit destination because in this and only this case, Mailman
doesn't see the
At 1:21 AM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
As I said above, this should never have happened as far as I can tell.
I'm sure one of the developers with more knowledge about this will
correct me if I am wrong.
I'm hoping for more information so I can prepare a summary of the
At 2:07 AM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
(locally) it's been referred to as a be strict in what you send, relaxed in
what you receive approach but not everyone adheres to (or is aware of) this
way of looking at things and it seems antiquated to some.
It's called the Postel
At 2:22 AM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
Aaaah, but that's the crux of the situation. I have read the documentation.
I have searched the FAQs. I have asked the list and I keep getting the same
answer: there is no obvious reason a {TO:listname,CC:thirdparty} post should
result in
Brad Knowles said the following on 2006/08/31 02:37 AM:
So, does my opinion count?
Of course it does. Credentials are useful, experience more so. Heck next
week we have a whole bunch of experts here to give opinions to the industry
(shameless plug for iweek)
The person in question wouldn't
On 8/30/06 8:07 PM, Brad Knowles at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2:22 AM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
Aaaah, but that's the crux of the situation. I have read the documentation.
I have searched the FAQs. I have asked the list and I keep getting the same
answer: there is no
Mark Sapiro said the following on 2006/08/31 02:55 AM:
It drove me crazy, because I knew there was
a real explaination for every glitch, and I wanted to find it, but I
think the 'poltergeist' explaination worked for many of the users.
Yeah, the radial flux in the atmospheric pressure excuse
At 4:56 AM +0200 2006-08-31, Bretton Vine wrote:
So far my experience has been wonderful with the product, good and bad with
the documentation, and rather difficult in terms of user-error, namely mine.
I am of the opinion that all software sucks, but some sucks less than
others. IMO,
The log file shows many queries looking for available lists. Is there
a way to find out who queried the available lists?
OS 10.4.6, Mailman 2.1.5
Jul 12 02:21:08 2006 (10579) No such list polaris-parents:
Jul 12 02:23:08 2006 (10596) No such list orion-parents:
Jul 12 02:29:24 2006 (10645) No
Hung Phan wrote:
The log file shows many queries looking for available lists. Is there
a way to find out who queried the available lists?
OS 10.4.6, Mailman 2.1.5
Jul 12 02:21:08 2006 (10579) No such list polaris-parents:
Jul 12 02:23:08 2006 (10596) No such list orion-parents:
snip
Look in
I've been asked to upgrade the mailing portion of the companies e-deals web
site. The current method of sending mail is primitive at best and requires
a lot of maintenance to keep bounces to a minimum. I am impressed with
mailman and its ability to manage most of these functions.
What I need
On May 7, 2005, at 03:36, Anshuman Prusty wrote:
In the test server at gospelcom.net, I am testing the subscriptions
for the newsletter and receiving the following error messages
--
--
Warning: fsockopen(): unable
Hello
Our site is www.settingcaptivesfree.com and we have some mailing lists like
1. SCF Update (www.scflists.com/mailman/subscribe/scfupdate_scflists.com)
2. Never Thirst (www.scflists.com/mailman/subscribe/neverthirst_scflists.com)
etc.
We are currently in the process of moving our
I am setting up a announce-only list which is sitting on my LAN behind a
firewall. I've got a couple of queries which I haven't been able to find
answer for on the FAQ: I am not allowing access to the web interface so
the only way a subscriber can unsub is via email. I'd like to edit the
RFC2389
On admin login I want to autanticate user from the user values stored in my mysql
database.
How I can do it?
sumit
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ:
At 3:41 PM +0530 2004/06/01, Sumit AGARWAL wrote:
On admin login I want to autanticate user from the user values stored
in my mysql database.
This is not possible with the current version of Mailman. IIRC,
there has been some discussion of adding back-end database features
to Mailman 3, but
Hello all:
I just tried installing 2.1a4 on a FreeBSD 4.5 box with Apache
and Sendmail 8.11. Seemed to work well, except that when users tried
to confirm subscriptions via the web, they would get to the page
where they are asked for the confirmation cookie, and no matter
what was submitted, the
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am a user of mailman 2.0.7 system. These a couple of days, I lost quite a lot of
pending administrative requests. The server always notifies me there are some
requests, however, while I log in, the system always says the pending requests lost
due to some errors. What's
Dear Sir/madam
I had seen your site and come to know that using mailman
i can send mails to group
but now i want to know how it will work
my questions are
1. whether this software will be handeled by server or i have to send mails from my
machine becoz my server is at different place
and what
Hi!, i've started up the mailman, but I have 1 problem
I'm trying to access web-base administration on a list (called 'foro') but
when I put the password and click 'Let me in...', it keeps trying 'till
timeout (sometimes, it doesn't show the html asking for password!)
Can you help me? thanks
Dear Sir,
i want to solve a problem regarding
limiting a size of attachment in mailman
sir,
i wnat to limit a attachment size of a posting before it is sent to the
list where as the body message size can be limited in mailman
i will be grateful if u can solve my problem
regards
one of the user
Hi,
I have certain packages installed in my home directory - ~/local/. How should i make
configure scripts to search for the header files in my home directory
in addition to the system default? Because after i run configure script and run make,
i get errors relating to header files being not
72 matches
Mail list logo
