Hello.
Excuse me for my English
Please, Could you help me? Our mailing list is crashed.
http:\\list.webaltair.com --- perico --- password: perico
We make a list, we recived the welcome mail, but when we send a mail to
the list, we recived this mail inmediatly:
This is the Postfix
Hello,
yesterday I upgraded mailman to 2.1.5 version and noticed that
attachment no more were scrubbed (in non-digest emails) although in
previous version they were scrubbed. Is the a bug or where should I
'switch on' that attachments were srubbed automaticaly (i.e. attachment
would be in
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Dan Szkola wrote:
The python 2.4.1 was compiled from source and is the only python version
on the box.
In a later post, you say it wasn't, but you removed the Sun Gnome
Python 2.3. I hope that fixes it, but I doubt it will.
It did not. It was doubtful mailman
OK, I found something extremely odd. For some reason,
the Utils.pyc in /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Logging
direcotry is being removed and then the compile of it
seems to fail and I'm left with a 0 byte file. It is
owned by the daemon user and later it gets compiled
and is owned by the mailman user.
I need to create one-way list. Like an annoucement list that allows only one
email address to post to the 300-member list. Is this possible?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
Hi,
I tried a few server configurations, using VIRTUAL_HOSTS_OVERVIEW = Off
AND without that line, but indeed Mailman treats lists created under
10.0.0.3 as seperate from http://mysubdomain.ourdomain.com. It can't
figure out from just the requested url, from which network this web
request is
jay alvarez wrote:
We just had a hardware failure with our mailserver
running mailman+qmail, the smtpd as well as mailman
daemons died because of hard disc space lost due to
some logs overgrowned that were not rotated. The
problem has already been fixed and the qmail daemons
as well as mailman
Javier --- Altairwrote:
Failure to exec script. WANTED gid 99, GOT gid 200. (Reconfigure to take
200?)
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.004.htp,
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq06.001.htp and
James wrote
I need to create one-way list. Like an annoucement list that allows only one
email address to post to the 300-member list. Is this possible?
Yes.
Search the FAQ wizard
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
either one-way or announcement will return the detailed
Saulius wrote:
yesterday I upgraded mailman to 2.1.5 version and noticed that
attachment no more were scrubbed (in non-digest emails) although in
previous version they were scrubbed. Is the a bug or where should I
'switch on' that attachments were srubbed automaticaly (i.e. attachment
would
David wrote:
Im on a hosted server. I am trying to decide if I want to archive my
lists or not. I don't seem to see any place that allows trimming the
archives if they start taking up too much space or just get too many in
general if I want to do it on weekly basis. Is that option available
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Mark Sapiro wrote:
lists or not. I don't seem to see any place that allows trimming the
archives if they start taking up too much space or just get too many in
general if I want to do it on weekly basis. Is that option available
some place?
There is no option
Courtesy of this list I latched onto the Mailman daily status report
script. Consequently I'm now aware of something I wasn't before...
I have 85 files in the shunt queue directory, most dated from 2 thru 4
May and a pair dated 25 Aug. They are all data files, so I can't simply
'more' thru
Hallo,
I have a account at a provider (1 1) (space on their Server)
with Python implemented and actived.
Is it possible to install Mailman ?
thanks !
antoine
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
Ok Thanks I was just finding this out in the FAQ (Who ever checks these
thingsSorry) and the List Home Page. How ever I see it is on the
wish list for 2.2 or 3.0 or some future release so I think I am just
gonna go ahead archive as the list is new on a new site and by the time
the
David wrote:
Seems my other post explains it. Email has nothing to do with it but
the admin password does. You can put anything you want or nothing into
the email box but putting the admin password lets you see. I was using
test email with same password so it let me in. So in other words
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 19:33 +0200, antoine wrote:
Hallo,
I have a account at a provider (1 1) (space on their Server)
with Python implemented and actived.
Is it possible to install Mailman ?
No. Mailman requires integration with other system services (MTA, httpd,
cron) that you almost
Steve Lindemann wrote:
I have 85 files in the shunt queue directory, most dated from 2 thru 4
May and a pair dated 25 Aug. They are all data files, so I can't simply
'more' thru them for content. The few I checked with 'strings' (and the
old dates) lead me to believe they can all be trashed.
Hello antoine,
On Friday, October 21, 2005, antoine
I have a account at a provider (1 1) (space on their Server)
with Python implemented and actived.
Is it possible to install Mailman ?
No, because 11 has their mail system running on different servers so you
cannot get your mails to the
Hello,
I have a signup sheet that subscribes people to a Mailman list by using
PHP to call add_members (the PHP is below, FYI). My problem is that
add_members seems to ignore the email confirmation settings from the
admin interface. Even though my list is configured to send a
confirmation
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 14:23 -0400, Ren Bucholz wrote:
Hello,
I have a signup sheet that subscribes people to a Mailman list by using
PHP to call add_members (the PHP is below, FYI). My problem is that
add_members seems to ignore the email confirmation settings from the
admin interface.
Dan Szkola wrote:
OK, I found something extremely odd. For some reason,
the Utils.pyc in /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Logging
direcotry is being removed and then the compile of it
seems to fail and I'm left with a 0 byte file. It is
owned by the daemon user and later it gets compiled
and is owned
Hello,
In Mailman 2.1.6, there is an option to scrub attachments from
individual messages (non-digest emails). Prior to that, attachments
were only scrubbed from archives and plain text format digests. Are
you sure you didn't downgrade to 2.1.5?
No. Previous version was 2.1.4. And new
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Dan Szkola wrote:
OK, I found something extremely odd. For some reason,
the Utils.pyc in /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Logging
direcotry is being removed and then the compile of it
seems to fail and I'm left with a 0 byte file. It is
owned by the daemon user and later it gets
Why does the sender name on my list include the word bounces? V2.1.6.
Thanks.
--
Pete Holsberg
Columbus, NJ
--
Age is not a particularly interesting subject. Anyone can get old. All you have
to do is live long enough.
Groucho Marx
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. Previous version was 2.1.4. And new version (2.1.5) I installed via deb
(Debian package). In 2.1.4 attachments were scrubbed in simple non-digest
format (there was one bug with encoding).
Just to be sure I understand, you are saying that attachments were
scrubbed
Pete Holsberg wrote:
Why does the sender name on my list include the word bounces? V2.1.6.
So that if the mail bounces, the bounce will be returned to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of to the list or the OP, and automated
bounce processing will work.
Actually, it should suffice that this address is
Dan Szkola wrote:
Very odd, I agree. A truss of the persistent queue runner that handled
one of the test mails shows this (12762 is the pid that mailman gets
when sendmail exec's it):
12762: open64(/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Logging/Utils.so,
O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT
12762:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Dan Szkola wrote:
You can see it actually unlink the compiled version and then look
for, find, and seemingly reject the traceback.py and traceback.pyc
that it finds. I thought it may be a too many open files problem
or a file descriptor limit problem because the FD returned on
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Pete Holsberg wrote:
Why does the sender name on my list include the word bounces? V2.1.6.
So that if the mail bounces, the bounce will be returned to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of to the list or the OP, and automated
bounce processing will work.
Actually, it
Pete Holsberg said the following on 10/21/2005 5:42 PM:
So that if the mail bounces, the bounce will be returned to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of to the list or the OP, and automated
bounce processing will work.
Actually, it should suffice that this address is the envelope sender,
but some
31 matches
Mail list logo
