On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 10:58:48PM +0200, Robert Meyer wrote:
Hey,
i have SMTP Auth work at my Linux-System. Does mailman work with this?
Mailman doesn't do SMTP AUTH, nor does it really need to
Marc
--
A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in - A.S.R.
Microsoft
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 01:55:08PM -0700, Larry Guest wrote:
I will be setting up mailman using lists to send mail to lists. I only want
lists members to be able to post. So mailman needs to look down the chain
of lists and make sure that the right people can posts to the list. It must
be
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 09:35:38PM -0400, Scott Courtney wrote:
Hi, folks
I think I have found a bug in bin/arch, but I imagine someone has found it
before. Also, I have run into an architectural limit and would like to
change a constant to fix it, if possible.
As you found out, there are
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 09:26:41AM -0600, Ryan Schouten - ABCOffice wrote:
Does your software handle bounce backs?
mailman 2.0: somewhat
mailman 2.1b2: yes, if you enable VERP
In both cases, however, it won't work as well as Ezmlm
Marc
--
A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 09:35:02AM -0600, Chris Wiegand wrote:
Here, all of my users are Windows users, and non-technical ones at that.
I read on that sourceforge page:
For the remaining people who do not want two copies and can't remove
duplicates on their side, the next version of
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 01:09:02AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While there seems to be a bug, note that:
Since this is a discussion list, it's useful to have the Reply-To: option
set up as This List.
Note that this is a common misconception.
It's all between the brain and the
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:05:12AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
Yo!
Mailman (stable - 2.0.9-1 Debian pkg) seems to not allow multiple
adresses in a Reply-To: field (set via web interface as explicit return
address), while many mailers do not have a problem with it.
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:20:11PM -0500, Bob Stout wrote:
Has anyone done any work on searchable archive, preferably with a web
interface?
Look in the archives of this list, or in the patch manager on sf.net for the
htdig integration patch
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:42:42PM -0400, wayne wrote:
My ISP is running version 2.01 of Mailman on their Linux 7.2 box.
Lots of bugs were fixed since that version.
You should ask your ISP to upgrade to 2.0.11
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 06:37:31PM -0400, Tony O wrote:
Is there a limit to the number of subscribers the Mailman mailing list can
have?
No, but the web interface gets noticeably slower when you start having
several tens of thousands.
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:14:17PM -0500, Bob Stout wrote:
I have a few users without web access. I know there's some sort of email
interface to Mailman, but I haven't been able to locate any documentation
on it. Help anyone?
send help to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:17:51PM -0500, Bob Stout wrote:
According to the administration docs, if the list is in use and Options
FollowSymLinks is enabled, then users should be able to get to the
archives. Yet, everyone who tries gets the message, You don't have
permission to access
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 08:15:37PM -0600, Tremaine Lea wrote:
Hey there folks,
Not sure if anyone else has run across this issue, but it's slowly
driving me batty. I currently have mailman 2.0.9-1 running on a Xeon
800 with 500 megs of ram. It has a single mailing list with roughly
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 07:29:16PM -0300, Eduardo Sosa wrote:
Hi!
After years having used Sendmail+Majordomo+Linux, I´ve migrated to
Exim+Mailman+linux http://listas.unam.edu.ar/mailman/listinfo .
I do know that you receive questions like this one every day, but I
would like to know from
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:18:26AM +0200, Support wrote:
Hello,
i'm searching a software that gives me the ability to send my newsletter to
nearly 240'000 recipents.
Unless you plan to use the subscribe/unsuscribe architecture in mailman,
you're better off rolling a shell script that loops
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:10:36PM -0700, Raquel Rice wrote:
Can anyone suggest a way of restricting privileges in the Mailman web
admin pages? In particular I'd like to stop users with list-admin
privileges from being able to change the max_message_size setting but
still
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:33:51PM +0200, Andreu Sanchez wrote:
Well, i have a question regarding mailman, we need to create some lists
with 5000 mail addresses and we ask ourselves if mailman would support
that huge bunch of mails and if the answer is yes, what machine must
have the mailman?
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:45:11PM +0200, Laurent Rathle wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to put french messages and templates in mailman 2.0.8 and if
yes, how do I set it ?
Not easily
mailman 2.1b2 supports that out of the box. You should try it.
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:34:47PM -0400, Jon Carnes wrote:
Lets not forget about the biggest bottle neck of all... the Hard Drive.
For maximum through-put, you need to use a SCSI drive or RAID array as the
Disk Subsystem for the server. If this is mission critical the obvious
choice is
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:53:52PM -0400, Phydeaux wrote:
This works fine and so far zero spam has made it onto my mailing
lists. Unfortunately, however, I am now trapping up to 15 messages
per day per list. I have to manually remove each piece of detritus
via the administrative interface.
2
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:37:04AM -0500, Paul Croft wrote:
Is there a site that lists the new features that are in this version?
There are announced right here, you can read the archives, but I'll save you
time, it's only bug fixes.
New features are in mailman 2.1
Marc
--
Microsoft is to
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:21:36PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Oops. If the site administrator allows it (via an mm_cfg.py
variable), list owners can suppress the RFC 2369 headers.
My bad, thanks for the correction.
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:25:53AM -0400, AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin wrote:
Does not work in a shared environment. PERMISSION DENIED every time!
Uh?
You gotta be part of the group mailman to have permissions on the db.
BTW if any of the programmers are here can I ask why a .db format
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:04:52AM -0400, AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin wrote:
What is the URL that I can go to pull a complete list of all my
subscribers and their password? I don't want any sort of nice cute warm
and fuzzy graphical glitzed up thing, just a quick and dirty
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:13:11AM -0400, AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin wrote:
1) I am running in a shared environment. When I send LISTS to the
listname-request address I get a listing of all lists on the server and NOT
just the one(s) for that domain. My domain should not be allowed to
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:50:44AM -0700, Bob Weissman wrote:
I hope I'm reading this right; may I infer that these headers will be
supressable on a per-list basis?
Nope, site-wide only.
Barry already knows that mailman 3 will probably need a toggle redesign,
where most options
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 02:45:37AM +0200, Norbert Bollow wrote:
The whole point of the GNU project is to create an operating
system that is completely Free Software. Therefore, it is only
proper to inform users of GNU software that this is our goal.
The only reason I'm answering here is that
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 11:42:09PM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 22:41:18 -0400
Karim R Lakhani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all, hi i was wondering if GNU Mailman keeps track of all users
that have subscribed (ever) to the list. Thus is there a data base
that tracks
[I do not plan to answer mails on this thread]
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:22:26AM +0200, Norbert Bollow wrote:
Sandra Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dear Mailman,
I currently use your Mailman software at work , through my univesity
system, and a fabulous system it is indeed. Do you
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:34:34AM +0200, CONTRAIRE M DsigTcs wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to setup mailman in a chroot environment.
It doesn't work and I am wondering if it's possible at all.
It is possible, you can run anything in a chroot environment. For that
matter, you can
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:44:19AM -0700, Ellen Spertus wrote:
A mailing list of mine works except for archiving.
I am using 2.1a3 on Redhat.
Ok, if you are using 2.1, you *really* want to use CVS, not snapshots,
unless they just came out.
Barry being a lucky guy invariably fixes a bug or
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 06:40:24PM -0400, Fuzzy wrote:
I discovered that one of my lists sanctuary-admin conflicts
with the admin address of the mailing list sanctuary, mailman
is taking the posting address and appending -admin and trying
use that as the admin address. this fails and
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 11:13:53PM -0500, Raik Nettling wrote:
Is there a way to create /delete a list through a web-interface or
e-mail ?
http://www.acme.com/mailman/create doesn't work. I cannot find find a
script for it.
I'm running mailman 2.0.9 on Redhat 7.0.
You cannot create or
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:55:01AM -0400, Tom Neff wrote:
Billie R. McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are using version 2.0.8 for a moderated list. But, we aren't able to
edit messages before approving them (for example, to delete just one
inappropriate word).
How can we do this?
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 03:42:25PM -0400, Tim Miller wrote:
Sorry I was not clearer about this.
Each list has a setting of whether or not to send out the monthly password
reminder (Send monthly password reminders Y/N). I want to send them to
every list regardless of how this is set.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:24:02PM -0600, Brian Noecker wrote:
Update on this:
Seems that the problems with the admin(21776): OSError: [Errno 1] Operation
not permitted error stem from the following observations:
the /opt/mailman/lists and /opt/mailman/lists/test/config.db file has
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:22:23PM -0700, Philip Rowe wrote:
Hey,
I've been going through the documentation in order to stop
Mailman from sending multiple emails to users for lists that
contain another list name.
You cannot do this with mailman 2.0
Mailman 2.1 could almost do this, but
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:46:53AM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 07:05:27 -0400 (EDT)
sean pambianco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Is it possible to edit messages that are held for approval in the
administrative interface? The header and the text?
Please see the FAQ:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:37:44PM -0800, Thomas Bartke wrote:
Hi:
why is it that the Envelope-to:-header in posts from my mailing list lists
all recipients? I noticed that he mails from this list (Mailman-Users) only
puts a single e-mail address in the Envelope-to:-header. Can we do that,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 01:40:40AM +0200, Herve Cassagne wrote:
Hi,
It is possible to Mass Subscribe Members from
the Membership Management page.
How many at a time should I add ? My list is
not very long: only 400 members.
4 times 100, or less, or more ? What is your advice,
-
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:20:39PM +0200, Herve Cassagne wrote:
Hi folks,
For a new subscriber, by default the setting account is (ampongst other
things):
- NOACK (the member does not get acknowledgements of his posts)
- If DIGEST, the format is PLAIN.
I'd like to change the defalt
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:07:17AM -0600, Catherine Mannix wrote:
Or you can set the Reply-to to Poster.
Hint: setting Reply-To does _not_ let you redirect answers reliably.
Reply to all with reply to the list and the original sender regardless of
what Reply-To is set to.
Your best bet if you
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:42:14PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MM == Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MM Ah, you want as a site owner to not have dupe removal enabled?
MM Ok, then after installing mailman-cvs, make sure you set
MM DEFAULT_NEW_MEMBER_OPTIONS to 0
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 05:25:44PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
Most MTA's are setup to use the Domain Name. I think the ip address would
screw them up considerably. You could configure your local MTA to handle
The RFCs say that you can send Email to listname@[192.168.101.202] (you need
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 11:23:45PM -0500, Sandra Cann wrote:
We have over 4500 users on our listserv. We are absolutely desparate for a
search capability for the archives. PLe!
Look in the archives, someone made a patch to get htdig to work with
mailman.
Marc
--
Microsoft is
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:44:38PM -0800, Andrew Hon wrote:
Hi there,
Mailman is nice, but I'm searching for a way to unsubscribe a list member
without him knowing. Currently it seems the member is notified, and there
is no option for not notifying.
I think if you have an unsubscribe
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 07:31:13PM -0600, Paul H Byerly wrote:
Hi all,
Can someone tell me how many members a list on version 2.0.7 can
have? I've been thru the gnu site and can't find information on that. An
old reference I saw says 1000, but that was for a previous version.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:01:03PM -0500, Margaret Levine Young wrote:
We have set up a series of actions for a list manager to take if a
subscriber is breaking the list rules, starting with one-week
hand-moderation (so the list managers have to approve the subscriber's
posts). The final
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:25:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the max # of users, I can register with Mailman?
10,000 to 100,000 per list
Number of list is currently limited (by your filesystem) to 16,000
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 01:39:18AM +0530, Frederick Noronha wrote:
Is it possible to send in approval commands via email (I used to do it
with Majordomo and Yahoogroups, but they are both difficult in other
ways) instead of having to log on via the Net?
Mailman 2.1 which will be out soon
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:07:26PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
They probably stored in a simple database, but you can dump them out by
~mailman/lists/listname/config.{db,pck}
dumpdb will list the content of those files
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
[I'm Ccing mailman-developers in case a few people there aren't on
mailman-users, but please reply on mailman-users]
Ben Gertzfield wrote a patch which Barry recently included in mailman-cvs
which allows you to not receive the list copy of a message in you were Cced
in the headers
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:59:32PM -0500, Bob Puff@NLE wrote:
Hi Marc gang,
I think that having those options would be nice, but also please allow for
reply-to being forced back to the list (regardless of user settings).
Some of us require that.
If you read my patch, you'll see that
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Fil wrote:
@ Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
If you think the patch is stupid and shouldn't be in mailman, you can tell
us that too :-)
If you want opinions, here's mine: I want to receive two copies if I'm CCed.
Not as an option
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 07:30:03AM -0800, alex wetmore wrote:
Mailman could look at the To and Cc lines of the message and make sure
it doesn't sent to members which are listed on those lines. This
would result in each person getting one copy, either from the list or
from the sender
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:13:33PM -0600, Jorge Cuevas wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have a question, that I consider tha has been asked before, but I wasn't
able to find it on the internet nor in the mailman-user list.
Is it possible to configure mailman so when you press the reply
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 11:00:36AM -0800, Robert Koberg wrote:
File /home/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py, line 869, in __load
fp = open(dbfile)
IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/home/mailman/lists/test2/config.db'
Doesn't ~mailman/bin/check_perms -f help?
Marc
--
Microsoft is to
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 07:48:45PM +, Michael Johnson wrote:
More importantly, how to prevent such things as future occurences.
Certainly, manually checking and removing the lock may work on a per
instance basis, but, in reality, it appears less than ideal. This problem
happens way to
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 02:58:30PM -0500, Jay S Curtis wrote:
Hmmm.. qrunner not running no lockfile found
(using postfix)
Am I barking up the wrong tree?
Hold on, so you are saying that your qrunner is running once a minute from
cron, that it complains that it's finding a lockfile and hence
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 05:30:34PM +0100, Daniel Furter (SUB) wrote:
hello
in the mailman version 2.0beta5 we have installed at our university
the subscribe all button in the menu administrative requests for
mailing list has disappeared. i appreciated this function very much.
now i have
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 04:38:56PM -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
John,
Thanks for responding. The Mailman version is 2.0.5 patched by Marc MERLIN
on SourceForge. The Python version is 1.5.
Are you talking about the python version on lists.sourceforge.net?
Because if so:
usw-sf-list1:~# python -V
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 07:47:31AM -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
Marc MERLIN knows which version of Python runs on the SF list server. I
hope he is reading this thread, so he can enlighten us.
Already done, but please, if you need sf.net support, submit a support
request on the sf.net web
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:27:08PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
This is definitely a Frequently Asked Question... Undoubtedly you are using
Konqueror as your web browser. Konqueror cannot handle the new cookie
layout (in version 2.0.8). Since it mis-reads the cookie, the
authentication it
should use the mailman setting here:
# does this site allow completely unchecked subscriptions?
ALLOW_OPEN_SUBSCRIBE = 0
Marc MERLIN wrote:
Of course, it then lets me unsubscribe you, but in some cases that's an
acceptable tradeoff
Actually it's different.
Open unsubscribes
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 08:13:57AM +1100, Joe Mizzi wrote:
How would i be able to subscribe users through the web interface without
having them reply to a confirmation email?
You can write a small CGI that calls
~mailman/bin/remove_members listname email
Of course, it then lets me
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 05:40:21PM -0800, Andrew Watson wrote:
I recently migrated a list to mailman, and after setup and testing, I
tried to move the list of subscribers to the new list. I did this by
pasting about 20 addresses, one per line, into the text box on the
Membership Management
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:11:49PM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
Can an admin do mailman functions via email, like approve emails on a
moderated list, instead of using the web?
You need mailman 2.1cvs for that.
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:55:20PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
Try it, it should work fine. Your users will be stuck using the web, but
that's not so bad.
Just for info, that's what I've done at my company for the last 2.5Y :-)
I want them to use the authenticated web interface to be *really*
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:07:38PM -0500, Jay S Curtis wrote:
First time I've ever seen this message..
Anyone know what might cause it?
-- Forwarded Message --
From: root (Cron Daemon)
To: mailman
Traceback (innermost last):
File /var/www/mailman/cron/senddigests,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 10:38:31AM +, Oliver Egginger wrote:
For some reason, konqueror sends back cookies with marks around them.
But this should mean that konqueror somehow works with mailman 2.05, right?
(I have a konqueror user complaining that it's not working either)
I
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 07:54:41AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Around 9 o'clock on Feb 1, Oliver Egginger wrote:
if MM-version 2.06 and browser is konqueror
then MM don't will work with passwords.
For some reason, konqueror sends back cookies with marks around them.
But this
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 03:45:42PM -0800, Paul Thomas wrote:
Howdy,
Is Mailman vulnerable to mail-loops caused by auto-responders
that are configured to look like an email sent by a person?
Yes.
Autoresponders are not supposed to answer mails with a precedence of list or
bulk, and they
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:15:59AM -0500, ITC wrote:
Hello,
Do you have a Mailman version that runs on a NT platform, or know were I
can find one.
There were a few words about this, but I don't think anything ever came out
of it.
For the most part, people interested in mailman are not
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:59:43AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
Has README.LINUX not helped? I'm attaching a few files from Mailman
2.1 just in case they have more useful or up-to-date information.
The script itself is probably too MM2.1-centric, but it
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:41:49PM -0800, Tom Perrine wrote:
I guess what I'm getting at is that the arch program uses LOTS of
memory when building some of the indexes, and that incremental
arch-ing may be more efficient and less likely to exercise
memory-related bugs in Mailman, Python, or
Level Support
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tavis Rudd (tavis_rudd)
Assigned to: Marc Merlin (marcmerlin)
Summary: mailman authentication broken
Initial Comment:
Mailman's authentication mechanism on the
administrative pages is broken for all of the 6 lists
that I manage. Nothing has
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 10:42:55AM -0800, Michelle Brownsworth wrote:
Yes, actually, I had a very similar problem to this on my system, that all
the configuring of sendmail short of making it an open relay could not fix.
I eventually switched to postfix and I havent had a single problem since.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 05:18:33PM -0500, The Berean wrote:
Is there any workaround in Mailman to prevent this from happening again?
Yes, ban the domain the autoreponder came from if it's from the MTA, or ban
the Email it came from if it's a home cooked script.
Unfortunately, there isn't much
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:54:18PM -0600, Chris Menzel wrote:
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=prog, pri=30015, dsn=4.0.0, stat=Operating \
system error
GIDs are correctly set for running mailman scripts. Any suggestions
appreciated.
Look for clues in ~mailman/logs/
Marc
--
Microsoft is to
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:49:44AM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 15:27, David Gibbs wrote:
My personal recommendation ... upgrade to mailman 2.0.6 (at minimum,
probably best to go to 2.0.7) and apply Geoff Dairiki's demime patch.
Just in case this is useful for someone, I wrote the following quick doc
for using mailman on a linux/grsec kernel
Steps you need to take to run mailman on a linux grsecurity protected kernel
1) Install and run
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0500, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
well, I guess I was wondering whether to do that or to try patching what
i've got... what are the pros/cons of each method?
Err, why?
I've always patched/upgraded my source tree, and typed make install.
Marc
--
Microsoft is
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:01:30PM -0500, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
i'm admittedly a very low-level sysadmin, trying to learn best
practices.
Which are, trust me, having the source tree of the installation you're
running (with python, you can patch the installed version directly, but with
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:20:45PM -0500, Donna wrote:
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 (101270)
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:50:46PM +0100, Andre Dieball wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to install htdig with Mailman 2.0.7.
I saw, that there are several patches available for that, but all of
them are for 2.0.6
The changes between .6 and .7 should be so minor that the patch should apply
as is.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:53:58PM -0500, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
I have an installation of mailman with one list running. It's for my
daughter's school. Currently, the list name is 'atrium' and it's
description is 'atrium school email list'.
I won't go into all the details, but I think
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:07:44PM +, Paul Crowley wrote:
I have a mailing list on my home machine, running Mailman 1.1, which
I'd like to move onto a colocated host, running Mailman 2.0.6. Is it
simply a question of tarring up the relevant directory in /lists and
unpacking it in the new
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:19:15PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2001 10:47, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 05:22:53PM -0500, Clark Cooper wrote:
I had a situation where a user on one of my lists had the vacation
utility turned on and a posting to the list
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 01:26:04PM -0500, Camille K. Powell wrote:
Thanks, but I hope there's a better way. I just switched from EZMLM to
Mailmain and I never had this problem. The auto-replies used to go to the
person that posted the message, not to the list.
Actually both are wrong,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 01:35:23PM -0500, Camille K. Powell wrote:
Are there any foreseeable problems with doing a mass subscription of
approximately 7,000 users?
No, as long as you use ~mailman/bin/add_members instead of trying to paste
your list in the admin web page.
Marc
--
Microsoft is
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 12:03:58PM +0100, Anthony Worrall wrote:
Is it possible to customise the moderators replies on a per list basis.
I would like to change the Your message to awaits moderator approval
and the Request to mailing list rejected replies.
You have the source
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:56:24AM -0700, J. St. Clair wrote:
Am thinking of using your software on my server ... I have a 5,000
subscriber list, does your softare handle that many subscribers?
Yes, and many more
It can start to get slow when you go beyond 50-100k users in one list.
Marc
--
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 06:14:25PM -0400, Greg Ward wrote:
On 12 October 2001, Spades said:
How do I get rid of all these headers on the mailman 2.0.6 mailing list mail?
AFAIK there are only two options:
* hack Mailman to not emit those headers
* tweak your MTAs config to remove them
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 04:05:47PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Mike Avery wrote:
I'd like to change the name of a Mailman hosted
mailing list. The only way I see to do that is to delete
it and start over, but I really don't want to do that.
Is there a clean way to rename a
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 10:05:13AM +0200, Norbert Bollow wrote:
Does Mailman provide a feature for searching archives?
That would be an awesome feature...
The mailman archives are all text based, so they should be easy to search
and index.
There's a patch at Sourceforge which adds
Ok, I'm not holding my breath because 1) I'm not contributing the code, and
2) like most people _I_ personally don't need it, but it's a feature request
from sourceforge users:
List admins have no way to do a quick grep on the list membership without
shell access to the list server (which
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:13:20AM -0700, Rick Backer wrote:
Too many open files in system
I get this error after sending out a email to are list. The size of the
list is 149271. Does someone know what is happening to create this error
Of course, if you told us what OS you were using,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 02:25:26PM -0400, Tania Rodriguez wrote:
Hi
I'm running Mailman-2.1a2 and I got a big problem. I have a mailing list called
modulos and everything seemed to be ok, you know, every single message was well
delivered, but today I got an alarm from my monitoring
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:48:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello my name is Barry W. Grubbs and I am very new to this. Is it possible
to have an open subscription to a mailing list, so you don't have to have a
password to join? What I want is for people to be able to subscribe to
My logs are being filled with:
Jul 12 12:44:02 2001 usw-sf-list1 (17423) Delivery exception: __int__
Jul 12 12:44:02 2001 usw-sf-list1 (17423) Traceback (innermost last):
File /var/local/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/HandlerAPI.py, line 82, in do_pipel
ine
func(mlist, msg, msgdata)
File
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
