Thanks to Steve Turnbull's help and some intelligent manual-reading, I
have successfully built and installed version 2.1.18-1 on a Debian 7
(Wheezy) system. check_perms reports no problems, `version' reports
the right version number, I'm ready for the next step, which is to
move an entire
On 06/05/2014 04:27 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
I'm ready for the next step, which is to
move an entire configuration and mail spool from an old Debian
5+Mailman 2.1.11 server.
I imagine the spool (/var) files can just be tar'd and moved en masse.
Yes and no. You do not want to move the
This reply mechanism is driving me a little weird--the reply function
sends the messages to their individual authors, not the list. I hope
I'm not breeching etiquette by redirecting my reply to the list.
Thanks, Mark, for your cogent and complete reply.
The short answer and good thing about all
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 12:43 -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
This reply mechanism is driving me a little weird--the reply function
sends the messages to their individual authors, not the list. I hope
I'm not breeching etiquette by redirecting my reply to the list.
Not at all! Most mail user agents
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:13:30 -0500, you wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 12:43 -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
This reply mechanism is driving me a little weird--the reply function
sends the messages to their individual authors, not the list. I hope
I'm not breeching etiquette by redirecting my reply
On 06/05/2014 08:45 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
OH no, it can do that all right, but it's a little odd in how it does
it. Instead of putting both addresses in the To field, it puts the
author in To and the mailing list in CC. I just use the regular
reply and change the address, pointing that