You could always do what we do with AT&T. We have been blocked for months with
no response and no reason given from AT&T. We are a government agency, so we
simply told our vendors and other entity's we deal with that if they use AT&T
or any ISP associated with them we will not be able to commun
On 2023-03-24 at 18:01:50 UTC-0400 (Fri, 24 Mar 2023 23:01:50 +0100)
Heiko Schlittermann via mailop
is rumored to have said:
What does this change? From senders PoV it is a temporary error. The
sender will retry.
The point of greylisting and "NoListing" is to eliminate the spammers
who do no
On 2023-03-25 07:37, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) via mailop wrote:
If you are going to block my MTA from sending email to your customers,
do us all the favour of preventing your users from sending email
to my MTAs in the first place.
you can try to contact Bell Canada for support.
dns-ad
If you are going to block my MTA from sending email to your customers,
do us all the favour of preventing your users from sending email
to my MTAs in the first place.
When they send me mail, but you refuse to let me reply, it makes
me look like I'm ignoring them, or blowing them off. Imputing tha
On 3/24/23 4:01 PM, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
Hm. Maybe I'm stupid.
Nope. I'm sure that's not the case. We all learn things when exposed
to new things. ;-)
What does this change? From senders PoV it is a temporary error. The
sender will retry.
NoListing works by causing the
Grant Taylor via mailop (Fr 24 Mär 2023 16:42:07 CET):
> On 3/24/23 1:24 AM, Renaud Allard via mailop wrote:
> > I would say, that's called greylisting. But with a changing envelope,
> > the message has no chances to pass any greylisting process. The
> > behaviour from mailgun would make them unab
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 2:08 AM Graeme Slogrove via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> We are having emails from our cloud service going directly to the SPAM
> folder in Yahoo/ATT.
>
Lili already helped, but in general we encourage folks to go to
https://senders.yahooinc.com for help and conta
On 3/24/23 1:24 AM, Renaud Allard via mailop wrote:
I would say, that's called greylisting. But with a changing envelope,
the message has no chances to pass any greylisting process. The
behaviour from mailgun would make them unable to pass any kind of
greylisting anywhere.
That's one of the a
Dňa 24. marca 2023 13:23:04 UTC používateľ Bill Cole via mailop
napísal:
>I would not interpret a rejection as being due to DMARC unless the error
>message specifically cited it
This will not always to happen...
Eg. with exim+rspamd, where DMARC rejection is done (suggested)
by rspamd, it is
On 3/22/23 23:32, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
It may be worth noting that pw has a particularly notable position, as
it was one of the earliest demonstrators of how a registry can sabotage
a TLD. They decided to market their "Pro Web" domains by making them
free and returnable for a while when
On 2023-03-23 at 16:18:24 UTC-0400 (Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:18:24 -0500)
Jarland Donnell via mailop
is rumored to have said:
I'd like to add a +1 to this for clarification, but in my case I'm
focused solely on SRS. Will Hotmail reject DMARC failures based on
From headers or envelope senders?
DMA
On 2023-03-24, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
> fh--- via mailop (Fr 24 Mär 2023 03:56:53 CET):
>> > does anybody from mailgun read here?
>> > Your messages are tmprejected at our systems, w/o any chance to pass
>> > ever.
>> b/c they were sending spams?
>
> I can't tell, because we reject
Please contact me off list. I can help with both
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 5:08 AM Graeme Slogrove via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are having emails from our cloud service going directly to the SPAM
> folder in Yahoo/ATT.
>
> SPF/DKIM/DMARC show pass in the message
>
>
fh--- via mailop (Fr 24 Mär 2023 03:56:53 CET):
> > does anybody from mailgun read here?
> > Your messages are tmprejected at our systems, w/o any chance to pass
> > ever.
> b/c they were sending spams?
I can't tell, because we rejected them with 4xx and they do not pass the
greylisting with a ch
Renaud Allard via mailop (Fr 24 Mär 2023 08:24:20 CET):
> > > does anybody from mailgun read here?
> > > Your messages are tmprejected at our systems, w/o any chance to pass
> > > ever.
> >
> > Why are you using tmp rejections for something permanent?
Yes, it *is* greylisting.
https://gitea.sch
Dnia 24.03.2023 o godz. 08:24:20 Renaud Allard via mailop pisze:
>
> I would say, that's called greylisting. But with a changing
> envelope, the message has no chances to pass any greylisting
> process. The behaviour from mailgun would make them unable to pass
> any kind of greylisting anywhere.
Hi,
We are having emails from our cloud service going directly to the SPAM folder
in Yahoo/ATT.
SPF/DKIM/DMARC show pass in the message
Is there someone we can connect with to understand why and correct?
Thanks!
Graeme
Email secured by Trustwave advanced threat protection. Learn more at
htt
On 3/23/23 16:31, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
On 23 Mar 2023, at 14:47, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop
wrote:
Hi,
does anybody from mailgun read here?
Your messages are tmprejected at our systems, w/o any chance to pass
ever.
Why are you using tmp rejections for something permanent?
18 matches
Mail list logo
