On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 18:43, Michael Grant via mailop
wrote:
> > (You could also try to reset the password, often sent to the registered
> > email address.)
>
> I have this issue with my gmail account. I get literally a TON of
> crap for other people who think they have my gmail account.
>
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 13:19, Atro Tossavainen via mailop
wrote:
> > Neither do I. The response simply describes what is happening. When a
> > third party X complains that Hetzner customer Y is a spammer, I consider
> > it only appropriate that Hetzner passes the complaint along and asks Y
> >
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022, 01:00 Ian Evans via mailop, wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 8:46 PM Brotman, Alex
> wrote:
> >
> > Did you ask if it's your IP, or the whole /24 or subnet?
> >
> > Could the target system exempt your IP?
> [snip]
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ian Evans
> >
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022, 00:25 Dave Lugo via mailop, wrote:
> My fiance's FB account was hijacked by a bad actor today. The bad actor
> changed the email address on the account, and despite multiple attempts to
> recover the account using SMS, the SMS texts don't arrive (dunno if
> her carrier
On Sat, 9 Apr 2022, 21:38 Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop,
wrote:
> Hi Tara,
>
> We bundle 3 and 5 IMAP boxes with standard and pro dns packages (domain
> reg + DNS + email) for $35/year and $55/year
>
> And yes, we support + addressing.
>
> We've also implemented SRS on your email forwarders.
>
> -
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 17:27, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
> On 2022-03-03 at 10:17:11 UTC-0500 (Thu, 3 Mar 2022 07:17:11 -0800)
> Michael Peddemors via mailop
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > whois emailsvr.net
> > No match for domain "EMAILSVR.NET"
> >
> > Time to register a domain?
>
> No,
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 at 19:35, Ken Johnson via mailop
wrote:
> I recently needed to send a software key to a remote colleague who needed
> to
> reinstall some commercial software after re-installing Windows. However,
> after the key failed to authorize, an investigation determined that the key
>
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 12:30, Paul Waring via mailop
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:37:35AM +, Rob Kendrick via mailop wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:21:19AM +, Paul Waring via mailop wrote:
> > > Before I change any more settings, I was wondering if there was a time
> > >
(Sorry for double reply...)
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 13:29, Chris Woods <
christopherwoods+list-mai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Correct the PTR, it's currently "romana.vs.mythic-beasts.com".
>>
>
Unless it's out of preference you're leaving it like that - I do similarly
with a domain distinct from
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 13:58, Paul Waring wrote:
> No, they say:
>
> SPF:PASS with IP 2a00:1098:82:b3:0:0:0:1
> DKIM: 'PASS' with domain xk7.net
> DMARC: 'PASS'
>
> There is no warning about no authentication (and there shouldn't be).
>
> > My SPFs tend to be slightly more verbose,
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, 17:58 Brandon Long, wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 8:08 AM Chris Woods via mailop
> wrote:
>
>> Tangentially, while not a bounce-after-accept, one user has been seeing
>> this 5.7.1 NDR when emailing a contact's GSuite account.
Tangentially, while not a bounce-after-accept, one user has been seeing
this 5.7.1 NDR when emailing a contact's GSuite account. It does seem
similar to an organisational bounce or incorrectly configured forward,
frankly I'm not sure what to make of it. Typically you can't reach a
Workspace
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020, 21:54 Michael Peddemors via mailop,
wrote:
> Your iPhone should be connecting to port 587/465 and don't block
> localhost.localdomain there.. clients should be able to send almost any
> EHLO, just block localhost.localdomain on port 25. IMHO
>
> On 2020-10-02 1:34 p.m., John
On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, 03:02 Michael Wise via mailop,
wrote:
>
>
> Let’s just say that it is quite typical that, “FreeMail” mail providers
> such as HotMail and … others … are typically not classical Profit Centers.
>
> Some try and fund their services with ads.
>
> Some … try and run it for the,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 23:39, Lili Crowley
wrote:
> Chris-
>
> I'm from Yahoo/AOL/VMG.
>
> I just helped him and help lots of people who contact me from mailop so
> perhaps adjust your commentary accordingly.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Lili
>
Noted, and apologies. Frankly it was brainfade on my part to
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 21:46, Simon Arlott via mailop
wrote:
> Could someone from Microsoft and Yahoo help me resolve this issue with
> 209.16.157.42?
>
> 550 5.7.1 Unfortunately, messages from [209.16.157.42] weren't sent.
> Please contact your Internet service provider since part of their
>
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 16:37, Ewald Kessler | Webpower via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of our IP addresses (91.197.72.142) got blacklisted at
> UCEPROTECT-Level1 with a "Last Impact" timestamp of 06.06.2020 16:57 CEST
> +/- 1min.
>
> But the peculiar thing is, no mail was
On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 12:04, Adam D. Barratt via mailop
wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-17 at 12:30 +0200, ml+mailop--- via mailop wrote:
> > On Sun, May 17, 2020, Alessio Cecchi via mailop wrote:
> >
> > > the domain name is stefanoboschi.it and after the transfer from one
> >
> > dig
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:15, Michael Wise via mailop
wrote:
>
>
> Heh.
>
>
>
> A perfect example of the Turing Test, but not in the way most people think
> of it…
>
>
>
> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2084970/
>
>
>
> You really were talking to a live human after step 2, but
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, 17:23 rps462 via mailop, wrote:
> I get it .. I'm usually one of the people asking folks to include IPs, but
> this is for several of my customers and I'd rather not discuss in a public
> forum.
>
> We've now received responses to our remediation requests saying the IPs
>
Another +1 for Mythic.
I had a VPS with a host acquired by MB. They onboarded me painlessly and
significantly invested in the infrastructure not long after acquisition
without hiking up my pricing which I was incredibly grateful for. Upgrades
went efficiently with the absolute minimum downtime;
It's an RBL-style block response but it may be due to an internal
blacklist. Have you contacted optimum/Optonline/Cablevision?
Found ab...@cv.net on https://www.optimum.net/pages/ReportAbuse.html if you
haven't already tried them... Perhaps also inet...@cv.net? (tech contact on
ARIN for
After recently receiving yet more spam from standards-compliant spam
servers (valid SPF, DMARC and domains on mainstream TLDs and delivery
tolerating greylisting), this discussion got me thinking again. Some open
questions:
Imagine an operator wishes to spin up a new email server, for themself or
Today I had to deal with an erroneous Hotmail JMR notification via my SNDS
registration - the email was an order confirmation to a customer, it
appears they use the Junk/Spam button as a Delete button.
Once I receive this email, if I can demonstrate that it wasn't actually a
complaint but was
I gave up long ago attempting to report bad actors using some of these new
TLDs, nobody cares to know. Simple cash grab by the registries.
I currently reject any emails from
.pro
.date
.science
.top
.download
.work
.click
.link
.diet
.review
.party
.zip
.xyz except abc.xyz with regex:
See https://serversmtp.com/smtp-error/ ,
https://www.arclab.com/en/kb/email/smtp-response-codes-error-messages.html
("SMTP
Error 451") et al.
451 is one of many SMTP response codes. The MTA understands the initial
error code and the other text is for your benefit.
Essentially 400s are generic
A slightly leftfield question for Monday...
Recently, someone who I didn't know emailed me out of the blue from a GMail
address to my own address. They were apparently trying to establish contact
for no obvious reason, almost like sending me an email after meeting in
person to exchange details.
I'm grateful to Alan who just pointed out he branched off the booking.com
discussion, I totally missed that thanks to gmail app hiding multiple
intermediate emails. (oops)
I've had numerous problems with some clients sending regular mail to gmail
and outlook.com addresses over the weekend and was
I've noticed over the last few days that certain messages in a thread (e.g.
the booking.com DMARC discussion) are neither delivered nor in junk mail
purgatory - appears they're being silently dropped, or perhaps rate limited
by gmail? Anyone seeing similarly?
Cheers
Chris
_spf.mail.yahoo.com SPF record validates any IP with a PTR within yahoo.com
or yahoo.net. Unless someone's spoofing rDNS it's from one of their MTAs.
https://secure.fraudmarc.com/tool/spf/_spf.mail.yahoo.com
Googling around, other example records:
tm13.bullet.mail.sg3.yahoo.com (old result, no
Sorry, should have clarified; a mixture of spam and SSH bruteforcing
attempts.
On Fri, 10 May 2019, 21:43 Luis E. Muñoz via mailop,
wrote:
> On 10 May 2019, at 11:49, James Cloos via mailop wrote:
>
> >>>>>> "CW" == Chris Woods via mailop writes:
> &g
Like others I've reached the end of my tether with DO. In my case, I've
seen increasing volumes of malicious / junk traffic via their IPv6
prefixes, with reports to abuse doing virtually nothing, so now I just
define ip/ip6tables drop rules.
30 seconds' browsing will return the ranges you need,
32 matches
Mail list logo
