> > > recently i see messages from this ML rejected by my MTA, due
> > > malformed To: header (from postmas...@inter-corporate.com):
> > >
> > >To: mailop@mailop.org
>
> Unrelated to the question of whether or not @ merits escaping or quoting...
>
> I personally wouldn't put an email address
> > recently i see messages from this ML rejected by my MTA, due
> > malformed To: header (from postmas...@inter-corporate.com):
> >
> >To: mailop@mailop.org
Unrelated to the question of whether or not @ merits escaping or quoting...
I personally wouldn't put an email address in the "friendl
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023, Slavko via mailop wrote:
Hi,
recently i see messages from this ML rejected by my MTA, due
malformed To: header (from postmas...@inter-corporate.com):
To: mailop@mailop.org
AFAIK, the display name have to be quoted (@ char in it), thus
my MTA is right, but...
Please,
Indeed, you are correct -- according to section 3.2.3 in RFC 5322,
the at ("@") symbol counts as a "special" character that's
categorized seprarately from "atext," and an example in Appendix A
demonstrates quoting when a special character is present:
RFC 5322 :: Internet
Hi,
recently i see messages from this ML rejected by my MTA, due
malformed To: header (from postmas...@inter-corporate.com):
To: mailop@mailop.org
AFAIK, the display name have to be quoted (@ char in it), thus
my MTA is right, but...
Please, am i too strict with this syntax check or this M