On 2022-04-24 at 00:55 +0200, Jean-François Bachelet wrote:
> Hello ^^)
>
> Haven't read the full EU stuff yet, but question :
>
> How can we be possibly become aware of such possible threats without
> SPYING -read it all- the email passing by our mail servers ???
Well, it only applies *when*
I'm prone to reading things like that as meaning "if you happen across
something" rather than "please go digging and if there's something to
find and you don't find it, you're dead."
On 2022-04-23 17:55, Jean-François Bachelet via mailop wrote:
Hello ^^)
Haven't read the full EU stuff yet,
> How can we be possibly become aware of such possible threats without SPYING
> -read it all- the email passing by our mail servers ??? only a jackass wana
> be terrst will put dangerous/alarm trigger stuff in the Subject of his
> emails. so do the EU wants us to play as NSA for free ? and
Hello ^^)
Haven't read the full EU stuff yet, but question :
How can we be possibly become aware of such possible threats without
SPYING -read it all- the email passing by our mail servers ???
only a jackass wana be terrst will put dangerous/alarm trigger stuff
in the Subject of his
Admittedly I do like the phrase "becomes aware of" as it should in
theory place the burden on a third party to prove awareness. Though I
can't imagine a lot of people become aware of a serious threat against
someone's life and then turn the other way, at least not anyone who
wouldn't now
It doesn't apply to phishing. Its very clear its about emergencies, ergo
threats about violence, bombs and such.
Phishing is definitely not a "threat to the life or safety of persons" as it
only poses a threat to property, ergo money.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Anne Mitchell via
