In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail
as follows:
<[elided]@gmail.com>: host
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4004:c17::1a] said: 550-5.7.1
[2610:1c1:1:606c::19:2] Our system has detected that this message
is
550-5.7.1 not RFC 5322 compliant. To
On 2022-07-13 15:31:17 (+0800), Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail
as follows: [...]
As far as I can tell, the message is compliant. It doesn't have any
of the obvious problems, at least. From, To, Message-ID and Date are
W dniu 2022-07-13 o 09:31, Philip Paeps via mailop pisze:
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail
as follows:
<[elided]@gmail.com>: host
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4004:c17::1a] said: 550-5.7.1
[2610:1c1:1:606c::19:2] Our system has detected
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the message is compliant. It doesn't have any of the
Can you post it so others can check?
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Hi Romain,
thanks for the link. VadeSecure was able to solve the problem with a
modification of their rulesets.
Regards,
Carlo
Von: Romain
Datum: Dienstag, 12. Juli 2022 um 14:11
An: Carlo Frietschy
Cc: "mailop@mailop.org"
Betreff: [EXTERN] Re: [mailop] Trouble sending mail to French
> On 13 Jul 2022, at 09:07, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
>
> On 2022-07-13 15:31:17 (+0800), Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
>> In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail as
>> follows: [...]
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the message is compliant. It doesn't have
On 2022-07-13 17:52:33 (+0800), Laura Atkins wrote:
On 13 Jul 2022, at 09:07, Philip Paeps via mailop
wrote:
On 2022-07-13 15:31:17 (+0800), Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from
Gmail as follows: [...]
As far as I can tell, the
On 2022-07-13 at 05:52:33 UTC-0400 (Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:52:33 +0100)
Laura Atkins via mailop
is rumored to have said:
[...]
There are currently quite a number of anecdotal reports that Google is
moving towards rejecting more email that doesn’t comply with their
interpretation of the
I've gotten bitten by this too, as I had my homebrew mailing list
manager intermittently generating messages with two message ID headers
-- but not in the past few days -- more like a couple of months ago.
So it could be new-ish, I guess.
Cheers,
Al
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 5:34 AM Philip Paeps
On 7/13/2022 11:18 AM, Miles Fidelman via mailop wrote:
It's been over a month now, since Google became hostile to email
lists. I'm still dealing with the aftermath.
Do you mean their stricter requirements around SPF and DKIM?
___
mailop mailing
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 8:29 AM Miles Fidelman via mailop
wrote:
> It's been over a month now, since Google became hostile to email lists.
> I'm still dealing with the aftermath.
>
> How so? We haven't seen any issues.
Mark
___
mailop mailing list
It appears that Al Iverson via mailop said:
>Yeah, I'm not seeing Google be "hostile" to mailing lists if the mail
>fully authenticates properly. I've felt mailing lists and
>authentication and Gmail were a solved problem, at least from my
>perspective, for a number of years now.
Same here. I
Yeah, I'm not seeing Google be "hostile" to mailing lists if the mail
fully authenticates properly. I've felt mailing lists and
authentication and Gmail were a solved problem, at least from my
perspective, for a number of years now.
What bit me recently was a bug, not some pushback against my
It's been over a month now, since Google became hostile to email lists.
I'm still dealing with the aftermath.
Miles Fidelman
Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail
as follows:
<[elided]@gmail.com>: host
Mark Fletcher via mailop wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 8:29 AM Miles Fidelman via mailop
mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:
It's been over a month now, since Google became hostile to email
lists.
I'm still dealing with the aftermath.
How so? We haven't seen any issues.
Mark
Once upon a time, John Levine said:
> Same here. I set up a kludge to rewrite From: headers several years
> ago (not rewriting to the list address, which sucks) and it still
> works fine.
Is there a standard for doing rewrites like that? Because I like to see
actual senders in the From: line
As far as the rfc ignorant rejections, the rules about some duplicate
headers have been ramping for a couple months, but only recently was the
error message updated to point out what the issue is, before it was a more
generic might be spam message.
This is in addition to the rules we've had for
It appears that Chris Adams via mailop said:
>Once upon a time, John Levine said:
>> Same here. I set up a kludge to rewrite From: headers several years
>> ago (not rewriting to the list address, which sucks) and it still
>> works fine.
>
>Is there a standard for doing rewrites like that?
No,
More bad actors at HostWinds..
142.11.213.163 x132payments-citi.com
142.11.213.175 x115rdns0.activepaypnc.com
142.11.213.201 x134rdns0.wellsfargo-remittances.com
I let someone else report these ones..
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
[ban] Country..: US
[ban] ISP..: HostWinds LLC
[ban] IPv4.: 142.11.213.0/24
[ban] Warning..: ALREADY_BANNED: 142.11.213.0/24
in permanent ban :)
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:02:59 -0700 Michael Peddemors via mailop
wrote:
> More bad actors at HostWinds..
>
> 142.11.213.163x132
Here it is blocked/trapped/tagged as well ;) And probably many other
places and reputation lists, but for those that aren't ..
Well, it seemed prudent..
Now, if they stop with the bot generated removal requests ;)
On 2022-07-13 14:11, Mary via mailop wrote:
[ban] Country..: US
[ban]
On 7/13/2022, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail
as follows:
<[elided]@gmail.com>: host
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4004:c17::1a] said: 550-5.7.1
[2610:1c1:1:606c::19:2] Our system has detected that this
22 matches
Mail list logo
