Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

On 15/9/2015 12:12 πμ, Michael Wise wrote: Sooner or later, your discussions will end there, and the ticketing will begin. There is **NO** way around it; Microsoft Legal has been very clear on the matter. This is interesting, I was just instructed by my server provider to contact

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

If it's Hotmail that is blocking you, my advice stands. If it's"protection.outlook.com" which is a different entity entirely, then delist@ is the way to proceed, yes. Aloha, Michael. -- Sent from my Windows Phone From: G.

[mailop] Security contacts needed for libero.it / tin.it / alice.it / tiscali.it / virgilio.it / fastwebnet.it / email.it

Please contact me offlist at Neil Schwartzman set of compromised user credentials. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Microsoft sending multiple Message-ID headers in password reset links..

On 15/09/15 18:24, Al Iverson via mailop.org wrote: Is this truly having an immediate negative impact operationally? It seems like this could be feedback you could give them directly, offlist, without having to share it with the rest of us. Very funny. Feedback to where? Their 1st line

Re: [mailop] Delivery to btinternet.com / cpcloud.co.uk

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 01:05:28PM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > That's part of it, sure. But having working RFC 2152 role addresses, RFC 2142, sorry for the typo. ---rsk ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00:01PM -0700, Michael Peddemors wrote: > Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage > from the servers called.. > > mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com I've seen a noticeable uptick in (obvious) spam from the following

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

About the only way to report it that won't get ignored (presupposing this didn't wind up in the mailbox of a HotMail, AOL, Yahoo, or similar service that we have an ARF-based Feedback Loop with) is via SpamCop. Seriously,

Re: [mailop] Microsoft sending multiple Message-ID headers in password reset links..

Multiple Message-ID/id headers for MSA mails has been brought to the right people’s (as far as I know) attention. From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Michael Wise Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 12:23 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Microsoft sending

Re: [mailop] Microsoft sending multiple Message-ID headers in password reset links..

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06:31PM +0300, Gil Bahat wrote: > If I were you, I'd stick around the list, perhaps answer a bit less or only > when you find things interesting. …maybe adding a couple of lines to one's killfile(s)… I think it's vital -- for the mail ecosystem -- that there are

Re: [mailop] Microsoft sending multiple Message-ID headers in password reset links..

On 15/09/15 19:44, Michael Wise via mailop.org wrote: No, it doesn't. After all, technically Message-ID is an optional field. I bitch and moan about that, but nobody cares... They all end up pointing to, "SHOULD", and I can't really do anything but :'( Yeah - it might say SHOULD, but it's

Re: [mailop] Microsoft sending multiple Message-ID headers in password reset links..

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Steve Freegard wrote: > > On 15/09/15 18:24, Al Iverson via mailop.org wrote: >> >> Is this truly having an immediate negative impact operationally? It >> seems like this could be feedback you could give them directly, >> offlist, without

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:49:50AM +0200, David Hofstee wrote: > I’m not sure why you cannot have an autoresponder behind the > abuse@/postmaster@ with a link in it, to a ticket, containing > the info sent in the first place. See abuse.io for example. I got ~2,000 spam mails to our abuse address