Re: [mailop] Trend Micro

On 13/04/2017 15:15, Brett Schenker wrote: Anyone from Trend Micro on here or have experience dealing with them? I have two IPs for transactional email listed and been going in circles for days now. We gave up and changed the sending IP address. From what I can tell they have a bug in their

[mailop] Trend Micro

Anyone from Trend Micro on here or have experience dealing with them? I have two IPs for transactional email listed and been going in circles for days now. Brett -- Brett Schenker Man of Many Things, Including 5B Consulting - http://www.5bconsulting.com Graphic Policy -

Re: [mailop] 'abuse@' a hosting company - was this a valid response?

Paul Smith wrote: Hi, just wanting a bit of an opinion here. We received spam from a leased/hosted server (195.154.62.181) to an email address which has never been used legitimately (ie it was a scraped email address) We reported it to abuse@ the hosting company with headers, message, etc.

Re: [mailop] 'abuse@' a hosting company - was this a valid response?

On 2017-04-13 09:26:19 (+0100), Paul Smith wrote: We received spam from a leased/hosted server (195.154.62.181) to an email address which has never been used legitimately (ie it was a scraped email address) We reported it to abuse@ the hosting company with headers, message,

Re: [mailop] 'abuse@' a hosting company - was this a valid response?

Hi! > We received spam from a leased/hosted server (195.154.62.181) to an > email address which has never been used legitimately (ie it was a > scraped email address) > > We reported it to abuse@ the hosting company with headers, message, etc. > > The response we got back was essentially

[mailop] 'abuse@' a hosting company - was this a valid response?

Hi, just wanting a bit of an opinion here. We received spam from a leased/hosted server (195.154.62.181) to an email address which has never been used legitimately (ie it was a scraped email address) We reported it to abuse@ the hosting company with headers, message, etc. The response we