Re: [mailop] Russian crypto phish campaign via sendgrid to stolen Robinhood account

2022-04-24 Thread Atro Tossavainen via mailop
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:02:42PM -0400, John R Levine via mailop wrote: > I've gotten several copies of this phish sent to an address stolen > from a closed Robinhood brokerage account. It's sent from Sendgrid, > with a link to a web host at AWS that does a couple of web redirects > to a web ser

Re: [mailop] Russian crypto phish campaign via sendgrid to stolen Robinhood account

2022-04-24 Thread Alexander Huynh via mailop
On Apr 24, 2022, at 23:09, John R Levine via mailop wrote: Anyone else seeing this? I’ve received a similar spam email supposedly from Metamask almost a month ago, from an O365 tenant to my O365 tenant: https://pastebin.com/Tb3S8BuD There are slight differences in the email I received: * the

Re: [mailop] [E] $GOOG

2022-04-24 Thread Simon Wilson via mailop
The systems may not *strictly* require a Gmail account, only a Google account, Your adding "strictly" does not change the fact that a Gmail account is not required. but that doesn't mean it is not perceived as such. Sure, the Google account sign-up page offers to create a Gmail address

Re: [mailop] [E] $GOOG

2022-04-24 Thread Ángel via mailop
On 2022-04-18 at 19:32 +1000, Simon Wilson wrote: > *Completely* and objectively not true. > > I've run Android phones for many years with a Google account based on > my own personal non-Gmail email. I have never activated or used Gmail, > and at no stage has an Android phone ever tried to for

Re: [mailop] [E] $GOOG. Domain age?

2022-04-24 Thread Ángel via mailop
On 2022-04-16 at 14:26 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote: > Dnia 15.04.2022 o godz. 20:18:54 John Levine via mailop pisze: > > > You quoted that. Eu.org is a *domain registrar*. Only. They don't > > > offer any > > > email service and never did. So how can they "police users for > > > email"? >

Re: [mailop] [E] $GOOG

2022-04-24 Thread Ángel via mailop
On 2022-04-24 at 00:44 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote: > Dnia 23.04.2022 o godz. 14:48:05 Dan Mahoney via mailop pisze: > > I would LOVE there to be legal structure to say “Gee, Equifax, you failed > > to demonstrate the basic opsec of paying some junior admin to type `yum > > upgrade apache

Re: [mailop] Interesting passage from the new EU Digital Services Act

2022-04-24 Thread Ángel via mailop
On 2022-04-24 at 00:55 +0200, Jean-François Bachelet wrote: > Hello ^^) > > Haven't read the full EU stuff yet, but question : > > How can we be possibly become aware of such possible threats without > SPYING -read it all- the email passing by our mail servers ??? Well, it only applies *when* y