Hi, just tested it and reciveing a valid response email from the verifier.
-Andrew
-Original Message-
From: mailop On Behalf Of Blake Hudson via mailop
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 2:31 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] verifier.port25.com
Looks like the email verification
Hey Al, That's easy all you have to do ^^^%% No Carrier
-Original Message-
From: mailop On Behalf Of Al Iverson via mailop
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 10:22 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Privacy research spam apparently from a grad student at
Princeton
I
Hi,
I just reviewed our logs and we are delivering normally to email.it. I don’t
see any current or recent issues delivering to email.it either.
Cheers,
Andrew
From: mailop On Behalf Of Lindani Hlabangana via
mailop
Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 8:22 AM
To: mailop
Subject: [mailop] Email.it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil_bit
Also
>In general, it's in the interest of Spammers to provide *any* clues they can
>that certain messages they send are more likely to be legitimate
FTFY
-Andrew
-Original Message-
From: mailop On Behalf Of Robert L Mathews via
mailop
Sent:
r my users say it is."
-Various Sources
Andrew Wingle
-Original Message-
From: mailop On Behalf Of Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 1:59 PM
To: John Levine
Cc: bl...@google.com; mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] [FEEDBACK] whose address, was Approach to dealing
I’d hedge on “fehlermeldungen” or SMTP-Fehler before those but as I understand
most will understand what a “bounce” represents in regards to email.
* Andrew
From: mailop On Behalf Of Alexander Burch
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 11:51 AM
To: mailop
Subject: [mailop] How to say
Hi,
We used to see that when we allowed PIPELINING. Usually we would get to the
RCPT TO: command without issue, start DATA and while in DATA receive an error
that was issued after RCPT TO: Since we were already in the DATA command their
servers stated we needed a RCPT TO...So the errors
Hi Brett,
Information on those errors was posted by Ira Hawkins back in October. Even
though they are 5xx-level errors it seems they should be treated as a possible
grey-listing.
TWC just implemented new Cloudmark MTAs over the last 2 months that are now
generating those AUP# rate limit
Hi David,
I can attest to the same issue and the replication of the issue. We have found
some scenarios where the same email will deliver to specific domain on one IP
and not of the other. I cannot say that we have seen a different result by
“cleaning” the HTML up. Seems that the blackholing
Anyone else encountering this mess? It came to light due to a SpamAssassin rule
"Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: googleapis.com]."
Any message using "googleapis.com" (used for fonts) is showing up as a proxy
listing.
https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL365718
Hi Dave,
Can you provide the first part of the bounce? Bounces from yahoo with that
detail arent aligned with a blacklisting. I believe those are almost always
reputation related and new sending IPs will see those errors for a few weeks
while their system adjusts to your volume and mailing
Hi Andrew,
If you could provide header samples it would be helpful here. As far as I'm
aware DKIM and/or DomainKeys needs to pass for Yahoo to allow the complaint to
be processed back to the PRA domain's complaint feed. If the DKIM is breaking
as you state then it may be that Yahoo changed
Hi Frank,
It would seem that you are not alone. We received word form AOL about some
issues they were dealing with this morning and that they were working through
them.
Regards,
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent:
alf Of Miles Fidelman
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 4:47 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] looking for contact at / info about comcast fbl -
follow-up
On 6/29/16 4:02 PM, Andrew Wingle wrote:
Hi Miles, on the whim of asking a stupid question, do you have any filtering in
plac
Hi Miles, on the whim of asking a stupid question, do you have any filtering in
place that might be stripping attachments for the inbound complaints?
Every ARF complaint we receive from Comcast has the original message attached
as well as the original headers. They do change some parts such as
15 matches
Mail list logo