Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing Gluster release 7.7

Hi Hu Bert, Thanks for letting us know about improvements. Now to check on possible reason, the question is, from which version did you upgrade to 7.7? Thanks On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:16 PM Hu Bert wrote: > Hi there, > > just wanted to say thanks to all the developers, maintainers etc. This

[Gluster-Maintainers] Flaky Regression tests again?

If I look at the recent regression runs ( https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/), there is more than 50% failure in tests. At least 90% of the failures are not due to the patch itself. Considering regression tests are very critical for our patches to get merged, and takes almost 6-7 ho

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] ACTION REQUESTED: Migrate your glusterfs patches from Gerrit to GitHub

Thanks for getting this done, Deepshika and Michael, and Infra team members. Thanks everyone for valuable feedback during this process! I personally hope this change will help glusterfs project to attract more developers, and we can engage more closely with our developers! Note that this would r

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-infra] [Gluster-devel] ACTION REQUESTED: Migrate your glusterfs patches from Gerrit to GitHub

On Mon, 12 Oct, 2020, 8:08 pm sankarshan, wrote: > It is perhaps on Amar to send the PR with the changes - but that would > kind of make the approval/merge process a bit muddled? How about a PR > being sent for review and then merged in? > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:22, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: centos8-regression #182

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:47 PM Deepshikha Khandelwal wrote: > Can someone please take a look at this failing > tests/bugs/nfs/bug-1053579.t test. > > *23:38:59* (508 / 782) *23:38:59* [18:08:59] Running tests in fi

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [IMP] Requesting a fast-tracked minor update for release-10

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 1:59 PM Shwetha Acharya wrote: > Hi Anoop, > > Release 10.3 was scheduled for August. However, as there were not enough > PRs tagged for release 10, we had to defer the release for 3 more months. > Considering that there is a basic functionality breakage scenario with > Sa

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

lusterfs >> MAINTAINERS file already have more. And that is only for the glusterfs >> project, many will have additional projects they are responsible for. >> >> We started with two to see how many people will be affected by this - > just limi

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 11: Revisting our proposed timeline and features

Here is my honest take on this one. On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 3:06 PM Shwetha Acharya wrote: > It is time to evaluate the fulfillment of our committed > features/improvements and the feasibility of the proposed deadlines as per > Release > 11 tracker

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 11: Revisting our proposed timeline and features

h the branching related activities? -Amar On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 3:24 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:40 AM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:41 AM Xavi Hernandez >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 4:03 A

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainer Meeting notes and AIs - 5th Apr

gt; arBQCMCYIQA===?both > > [2] https://bluejeans.com/s/Nx4MS > > [3] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] bug-1421590-brick-mux-reuse-ports.t failure

c-calls-test.t - 7 second >>> ./tests/basic/gfapi/bug-1241104.t - 7 second >>> ./tests/basic/fops-sanity.t - 7 second >>> ./tests/basic/distribute/throttle-rebal.t - 7 second >>> ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1135514-allow-setxattr-with-null-value.t - 6 >>> second >>> ./tests/bugs/core/bug-557.t - 6 second >>> ./tests/bugs/cli/bug-977246.t - 6 second >>> ./tests/bugs/cli/bug-921215.t - 6 second >>> ./tests/bugs/cli/bug-867252.t - 6 second >>> ./tests/bugs/cli/bug-1378842-volume-get-all.t - 6 second >>> ./tests/bugs/cli/bug-1004218.t - 6 second >>> ./tests/bugs/access-control/bug-1387241.t - 6 second >>> ./tests/bitrot/bug-internal-xattrs-check-1243391.t - 6 second >>> ./tests/basic/gfapi/libgfapi-fini-hang.t - 6 second >>> ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-cli.t - 6 second >>> ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1117951.t - 5 second >>> ./tests/bugs/cli/bug-969193.t - 5 second >>> ./tests/bugs/cli/bug-949298.t - 5 second >>> ./tests/bugs/cli/bug-764638.t - 5 second >>> ./tests/bugs/cli/bug-1047378.t - 5 second >>> ./tests/basic/posixonly.t - 1 second >>> ./tests/basic/netgroup_parsing.t - 1 second >>> ./tests/basic/exports_parsing.t - 1 second >>> ./tests/basic/first-test.t - 0 second >>> >>> Result is 1 >>> >>> tar: Removing leading `/' from member names >>> Logs archived in http://slave28.cloud.gluster.o >>> rg/logs/glusterfs-logs-regression-test-burn-in-2932.tgz >>> kernel.core_pattern = /%e-%p.core >>> Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure >>> ___ >>> maintainers mailing list >>> maintainers@gluster.org >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers >>> >> -- >> - Atin (atinm) >> > > > > -- > > ATin Mukherjee > > Associate Manager, RHGS Development > > Red Hat > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > amukh...@redhat.comM: +919739491377 > <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> IM: IRC: > atinm, twitter: @mukherjee_atin > <https://red.ht/sig> > > > > -- > > ATin Mukherjee > > Associate Manager, RHGS Development > > Red Hat > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > amukh...@redhat.comM: +919739491377 > <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> IM: IRC: > atinm, twitter: @mukherjee_atin > <https://red.ht/sig> > > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > gluster-de...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] proposal on few changes in regression voting to keep upstream 'master' fast moving

any serious concerns. Regards, [1] - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017-March/052245.html [2] - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017-May/052844.html -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Reviews older than 90 days

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:28:40AM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Did get hold of all the pending patches till 2017-05-20 (660 in total). > > Note that it includes "All open" patches. > > > > Attached is

[Gluster-Maintainers] [Proposal]: Changes to how we test and vote each patch

erious concerns. [1] - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017- March/052245.html [2] - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017-May/052844.html Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Reviews older than 90 days

ttps://hackmd.io/MbBsEMFMCMBYEYC0BOYAzATI2BmD5Fp4B2A5DAVlmgA5hjQATZeIA===# Nigel, how would you want to go about this next? On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Did get hold of all the pending patches till 2017-05-20 (660 in total). > Note that it includes "All open" p

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Proposal]: New branch (earlier: Changes to how we test and vote each patch)

aintain this branch to make sure it is in all its sanity, and keep track of patches which gets in. Let me know what each of you would think. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > All, > > Below is mainly a proposal, and I would like to hear people's thought on

[Gluster-Maintainers] M2 maintainer's list

'Final' sheet) : https://docs.google.com/a/redhat.com/spreadsheets/d/16IXxyhYb2VdhVqUYyJ5jAT-EvEj4xnkIMD_C4nrNVoY/edit?usp=sharing If I don't here anything in another 3 days, I will assume these are good? -Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts)

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] M2 maintainer's list

ime now. Lets use more open Use this now: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TPJQsv5FqZiv4Vo2ayla1PoS71N2TZBN31KSXE8kxiA/edit?usp=sharing Let me call it out, I haven't considered 'MAINTAINERS' file totally here. Regards, Amar > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] M2 maintainer's list

NOTICE: I have revoked the access to RedHat drive spreadsheet, and gave link to spreadsheet from my account. Throw your questions, concerns and suggestions. -Amar On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

: https://review.gluster.org/17480 > > [4] Release calendar: https://www.gluster.org/community/release-schedule/ > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) __

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

gt; >> Thanks, >> Shyam/Kaushal >> >> [1] Release bug tracker: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.1 >> >> [2] 3.11 review dashboard: >> https://review.gluster.org/#/projects/glusterfs,dashboards/d &

[Gluster-Maintainers] New 'experimental' branch created for validating your ideas

default. - few more metrics added in memory allocation checks. - All the above can be seen with sending SIGUSR2 signal to GlusterFS process. (@ /tmp/glusterfs.* ) Regards, Amar [1] - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2017-May/002644.h

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] New 'experimental' branch created for validating your ideas

months window (similar to that of release branch cut-off). Yet to finalize on that. > And how has the permission to merge the patches in the experimental branch. > > Assuming it is 'who' and not 'how', Currently I (@amarts) have the permission to merge patches. Regards, Amar

[Gluster-Maintainers] Reducing the time to test patches which doesn't modify code

re file too. [1] - https://review.gluster.org/17522 Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

mentation consistency. For > example, style, glossary, etc, all kind of stuff that shouldn't be per > component but aligned overall. > > > The maintenance of the gluster.readthedocs.io site might be a > > infrastructure task? > > Wouldn't it be more logical

[Gluster-Maintainers] Update on experimental branch (was Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : experimental-periodic #21)

es on master again to stick with 3 months branch out timelines. Regards, Amar On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:07 AM, wrote: > See <https://build.gluster.org/job/experimental-periodic/21/ > display/redirect?page=changes> > > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts)

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Update on experimental branch (was Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : experimental-periodic #21)

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Amar Tumballi >> wrote: >> >>> Experimen

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > All, > > Thanks for participating actively in the discussions. With all your > co-operation we now have a update on maintainers 2.0 proposal. Vijay Bellur > sent a patch last week [1] capturing all the discussions. > &

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

ising the tasks. [11] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/175 [12] - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017-July/053359.html > [1] Review focus: https://review.gluster.org/#/q > /starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] On knowledge transfer of some of the components

> Nithya > >> >> [1] https://review.gluster.org/17583 >> >> regards, >> Raghavendra >> > > > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] On knowledge transfer of some of the components

node table would be a good start > Regards, > Sanoj > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12: Status of features (Require responses!)

____ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] 4.0 discussions: Need time slots

For now, I will create a calendar invite for Wednesday 5pm-6pm IST. Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] 4.0 discussions: Need time slots

> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 03:06 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > >> > >> Tuesday (1st Aug) - 8:30pm-9:30pm IST (11am - 12pm EDT). > >> Wednesday (2nd Aug)

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] [Need Feedback] Monitoring

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Michael Scherer > wrote: > >> Le mardi 13 juin 2017 à 11:14 -0400, Amar Tumballi a écrit : >> > All, >> > >> > Please update the github issue [1], w

[Gluster-Maintainers] [Update] Gluster Maintainers meeting - 9th August, 2017

NFS Ganesha. Had some issues with Glusterd, but otherwise we found it fine. Action Items: - [Amar] To send a mail on protocol changes for 4.0 Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Possible Blog Posts

..@redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead > > _______ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Proposed Protocol changes for 4.0: Need feedback.

and happy to co-ordinate it on experimental branch before sending them as a single patch (or multiple dependent, granular patches) on master when we feel it is ready. Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster 4.0 release: Update from maintainers meeting

Hey Ants, Below is the message we want to get out from ant colony to users and developer community this week. (Was pending AI on me since 2 weeks). I want each of you to review this and give a Ack/No Ack on this. Also if you think major edits are required for message, we can collaborate on hackmd

[Gluster-Maintainers] Reminder: Meeting on 23rd, add up your agenda

the meeting (for keeping time limited to 1hr). Hope that is fine. Regards, Amar -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Meeting minutes: 23rd Aug, 2017

ew.gluster.org/#/c/18091/ - We don’t have a documented process for new peers at this point. - We went with both maintainers acking. - [Amar]: This is the valid process, and is already agreed upon with Maintainers v2.0 document. Regards, Amar -- Ama

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster 4.0 release: Update from maintainers meeting

530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Hey Ants, > > > > Below is the message we want to get out from ant colony to users and > > developer community this week. (Was pending AI on me since 2 weeks). I > want > > each of you to review this and give a Ack/No Ack on this. >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Gerrit for Maintainers

f you have questions with subscribing to changes to > creating custom dashboards. > > -- > nigelb > > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > -- Amar

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Patch-etiquette reminder

et more eyeballs into experimental branch, mainly considering about meeting possible deadline of Nov-Dec, 2017 for Gluster 4.0. Regards, Amar > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/

[Gluster-Maintainers] Metrics: and how to get them out from gluster

rfs/issues/137 [2] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/141 [3] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/275 [4] - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/168 [5] - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2017-August/002954.html (last email of the thread). [6] - https://g

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposed Protocol changes for 4.0: Need feedback.

l plan out execution path for it further. Regards, Amar On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > > > On 11 August 2017 at 18:04, Amar Tumballi wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Below are the proposed protocol changes (ie, XDR changes on the

[Gluster-Maintainers] [Feedback] Error codes instead of errnos

- If the main logic, and changes to `compat-errno.{c.h}` are fine, I would like to hear about possibilities of a hackathon for getting the code-base walk through for changing errno to error code (and also possible new addition to error codes if it makes sense). Regards, A

[Gluster-Maintainers] Reminder: Maintainers' meeting tomorrow (Sept 6th, 2017)

ing in their domain) See you there tomorrow. -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Reminder: Maintainers' meeting tomorrow (Sept 6th, 2017)

d a point to discuss the possible change of timing for maintainers meeting in agenda itself. I agree everyone would have spent time to come to agreement for to this time-slot. But it is a good idea to keep validating every 6 months once. We can discuss about this in meeting today! -Amar

[Gluster-Maintainers] Meeting minutes: 09/06/2017 (Sept 06th)

- [Nigel] Clang/coverity fixes should have a plan to decrease it for future releases. -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Changing Submit Type on review.gluster.org

t. Regards, Amar > [1]: https://review.gluster.org/Documentation/intro-project- > owner.html#submit-type > [2]: http://gerritstats-demo.firebaseapp.com/ > > -- > nigelb > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Metrics: and how to get them out from gluster

Thanks all for the feedback! On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 12:21 AM, John Strunk wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > >> Disclaimer: This email is long, and did take significant time to write. >> Do take time and read, review and give feedb

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.12.1 released

On 12-Sep-2017 6:47 AM, "Atin Mukherjee" wrote: Can someone please explain what's the reason of doing 3.12.1 so early, just after 5 days of 3.12? As per the schedule? It's 10days since release. -Amar On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 at 22:58, Gluster Build System < jenk...@build.gluster.org> wrote: > >

[Gluster-Maintainers] [Reminder] Maintainers meeting tomorrow

n time, and this week, I would like a volunteer to host the meeting. -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Meeting minutes: 09/20/2017 (Sept 20th)

nboard in Red Hat Gluster team. - [Vijay] FOSDEM, DevConf discussion are on, will hear more in the future on this -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Reminder: Maintainers meeting tomorrow: Agenda

points at : https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Reminder: Maintainers meeting tomorrow: Agenda

at 2:00 PM UTC, 7:30 PM IST, 10:00 AM Eastern. -Amar > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) _

[Gluster-Maintainers] Minutes of Meeting (Oct 4th)

Meeting date: 10/04/2017 (Oct 4th) BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 - Download: https://bluejeans.com/s/d0hgj

[Gluster-Maintainers] Client Server incompatibility with Gluster 4.0

ble cherrypicks from upstream fuse project to utilize more features from there, so for the user, there are lot of reason to upgrade the clients. -Amar On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Not sure how many of you have gone through the email! As we are done with > 3.12 rel

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Release 3.12.2 : Scheduled for the 10th of October

s://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.12.2 > >> > >> [2] 3.10 review dashboard: > >> https://review.gluster.org/#/projects/glusterfs,dashboards/d > ashboard:3-12-dashboard > >> > >> > > > > ___ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > gluster-us...@gluster.org > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Rqelease 3.12.2 : Scheduled for the 10th of October

+1 Agree with Shyam. We can make more releases, but let's not stop release cycle. On 12-Oct-2017 8:32 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" wrote: On 10/12/2017 08:09 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: > >> [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/ >> >> [1] : https://review.gluster.org/18506 >>

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Client Server incompatibility with Gluster 4.0

ced as early as possible and so that > users have time to understand that postponing the update to GD2 will incur > a 2 step process. > > >> Kaushal, Atin - can you please share details on how the upgrade process >> would look like from a glusterd perspective? >> > _

[Gluster-Maintainers] Meeting date: 10/17/2017 (Oct 17th, 19:30IST, 10:00EST)

able Feel free to add your points @ https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] RFC: Suggestions on patches taking more than 10 tries

Possible reason it could happen, and possible suggestions, feel free to voice your concerns: - If people are doing 'rebase' only to check centos regressions: - then I guess they should be told that they can probably be able to run the tests locally too. - is there a documentati

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers Meeting: Agenda (Nov 1st, 2017)

Meeting date: 11/01/2017 (Nov 1st, 19:30IST, 14:00UTC, 10:00EST) BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 - Download:

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers' meeting: Minutes (11/01/2017 - Nov 1st, 2017)

r the review”. - etc, etc. --- Join us back in another 2 weeks if you have any further points to discuss. Meantime, feel free to discuss further in this thread if there some thoughts you have on the meeting. -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Branch rebase (Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : experimental-periodic #130)

As we did a branch cut out for release-3.13, I plan to do a rebase of experimental branch on top of latest master by Nov 15th. Regards, Amar On 04-Nov-2017 10:28 AM, wrote: See _

[Gluster-Maintainers] Agenda for Nov 15th Maintainers meeting

inal authors. - Round Table: - <https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both#decisions> Decisions - Update link if you want to add anything: https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both -- Ama

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainer's Meeting Minutes: Meeting date: 11/15/2017 (Nov 15th)

release branches: Ack - regression-test-burn-in on demand for release branches: (I think this was an Ack from Infra folks) - regression-test-burn-in for master moved to nightly (close to mid-day easter TZ): Ack -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ ma

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Branch rebase (Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : experimental-periodic #130)

2 Regards, Amar On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > As we did a branch cut out for release-3.13, I plan to do a rebase of > experimental branch on top of latest master by Nov 15th. > > Regards, > Amar > > On 04-Nov-2017 10:28 AM, wrote: > > See <ht

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: Schedule and scope clarity (responses needed)

Thanks for this compilation. Response inline. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > As this is a longish mail, there are a few asks below, that I request > folks to focus and answer. > > 4.0 is a STM release (Short Term Maintenance), further, 4.1 is also slated > as

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.13: Release notes (Please read and contribute)

Sorry, missed this earlier. On 20-Nov-2017 3:12 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" wrote: Hi, 3.13 RC0 is around the corner (possibly tomorrow). Towards this and the final 3.13.0 release, I was compiling the features that are a part of 3.13 and also attempted to write out the release notes for the same

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: Schedule and scope clarity (responses needed)

to 4.0, >> so that the project board can be rightly populated with the issue. >> >> Ask 4: If the 4.0 branching date was extended by another 4 weeks, would >> that enable you to finish additional features that are already marked for >> 4.0? This helps us move the n

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers' meeting - Agenda : Meeting date: 11/29/2017

<https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both#decisions> Decisions - Add if any - Add your topic at https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers meeting minutes - Nov 29th 2017.

- gluster-spec like template for github feature requests [Shyam] <https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both#decisions> Decisions - Jan 15th Branch out for 4.0 - Maintainers should keep an eye on patches which are important for module, but the aut

[Gluster-Maintainers] Request for holding the merges on posix xlator

Hi maintainers, This may look like a weird request, but at the moment I propose allowing a week (or lesser) for an effort to re-organize posix translator, which is being done here: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18880/ All major patches changing anything on posix are now merged. 2 more patches w

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Branch rebase (Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : experimental-periodic #130)

f6b1827 Add new fields to translator options(quota and marker) for GD2 > e768810 stripe, quiesce: volume option fixes > f5ee636 rfc.sh: fixes for faster submit Regards, Amar On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > 'experimental' is now rebased to latest master

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Branch rebase (Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : experimental-periodic #130)

to ask you to rebase last week and I thought that > happens only once in > 3 months. Hopefully this time, there is no manual conflict resolution:) > > -Kotresh HR > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Amar Tumballi > wrote: > >> I analysed all the changes in experimental,

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers meeting Agenda: Dec 13th

This is going to be a longer meeting if we want to discuss everything here, so please consider going through this before and add your points (with name) in the meeting notes. See you all tomorrow. Meeting date: 12/13/2017 (Dec 13th, 19:30IST, 14:00UTC, 09:00EST)

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers meeting minutes: 13th Dec, 2017

BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 - Download: https://bluejeans.com/s/eTey Attendance - [Sorry Note] - Nigel - Amar - Atin - Nithya

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposed Protocol changes for 4.0: Need feedback.

branch-out. Regards, Amar On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi All, > > Below are the proposed protocol changes (ie, XDR changes on the wire) we > are thinking for Gluster 4.0. > > >- rchecksum/fsetattr: Add 'gfid' field on wire >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] xlator_api and class_methods added to top-level xlator.sym

them in release branch, So that we can fix it by 4.1 version at least. > Thanks, > > -- > > Kaleb > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers' meeting Agenda (10th Jan, 2018)

d your comments at https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainer Meeting minutes - Jan 10th, 2018

The first maintainers' meeting of the year 2018 went well, and there were discussion and participation till the last minute. I hope more maintainers join regularly to this meeting, and make it easier to take decisions. BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 - Download: https

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: Making it happen! (Protocol changes and wireshark)

3285a204bdff3b8b80e2811dc > d9b7ab6fe0;hb=HEAD > > > > [2] Wireshark roadmap: https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Roadmap > > > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 4.0: Making it happen!

be tracked against 4.0 and how much time is possibly >> needed to make it happen. >> >> - Poornima, Amar, Jiffin, Du, Susant, Sanoj, Vijay >> >> > I request an extension till end of next week to complete my task. > > Thanks, > Vijay > > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Geo-replication infra failures

reliably reproduce the geo-rep failure on a machine where `ssh >>>> root@127.0.0.1` works. What are the next steps I can take to debug >>>> this? I can also provide you with access if you'd like. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> nigelb >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> nigelb >> > > > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Kotresh H R > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Amar will not be available from 21st - 28th Jan, 2018.

Considering its a critical time for branch out for 4.0, call me or text me if something critical comes up. I will not be on top of emails/review queue then. Regards, Amar ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailm

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers Meeting Agenda for tomorrow (7th Feb, 2018)

s are being run on CentOS7 partially already) - NetBSD ? --- Add your topic at https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http:/

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainer Meeting minutes (7th Feb, 2018)

he intermitent failures are reduced to almost 0. - NetBSD - No response to our emails, taking that as ‘No one is interested to maintain it at the moment’ - Roundtable - No updates - Feel free to comment on this thread if you have any questions.

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainer's Meeting Agenda (21st Feb 2018)

lease numbers move out from x.y.z to yy.mm.dd format ? (Or any other format too is fine) -- Add your topics @ https://hackmd.io/MYTgzADARgplCGBaA7DArMxAWAZvATIiFhJgCYarBQCMCYIQA===?both -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maint

[Gluster-Maintainers] Meeting Minutes (21st Feb 2018)

e changes to maintainers (today) -> By next Tuesday seek feedback from Users -> 2 weeks hence announce and change the web page to reflect new scheme (and other work in this regard) -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailin

[Gluster-Maintainers] Meeting minutes (7th March)

too), only 4 tests are consistently failing. Need to look at it. -- Amar Tumballi (amarts) ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Update on Process Automation initiatives

Hi all, As a step towards achieving our promise on Goals for the year 2018 [1], we have taken up automating some of the work flow of glusterfs development cycle. Below is the update on one such effort. This work intends to make the development process more efficient by automating aspects o

[Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

Hi all, Below is the proposal which most of us in maintainers list have agreed upon. Sharing it here so we come to conclusion quickly, and move on :-) --- Until now, Gluster project’s releases followed x.y.z model, where x is indicating a major revision, and y a minor, and z as a patched release

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: LTM release targeted for end of May

erimental by then. Regards, Amar > Thanks, > Shyam > P.S: Also any volunteers to shadow/participate/run 4.1 as a release owner? > ___ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

expectation >>>>> > could go away which would actually cause less confusion. >>>>> >>>>> Above is the reason I state it as well (the breaking of the mental >>>>> model >>>>> around this), why tie it together when it is not totally related. I >>>>&

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainer's meeting minutes (21st March, 2018)

ions is the future requirement for us. Everyone, please consider figuring out for your components work for it. - [shyam] I see a good response for features this time. Expectation is to meet what we promised. See github projects page for seeing whats agreed for 4.1 -- Ama

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: LTM release targeted for end of May

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 03/21/2018 04:12 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Current 4.1 project release lane is empty! I cleaned it up, because I > > want to hear from all as to what content to add, than add things > marked > >

[Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to make Design Spec and Document for a feature mandatory.

Hi all, A better documentation about the feature, and also information about how to use the features are one of the major ask of the community when they want to use glusterfs, or want to contribute by helping get the features, bug fixes for features, etc. Finally, we have taken some baby steps to

  1   2   >