This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
There is no general practice to consider here. In the U.S., at least,
an image is considered copyrighted as soon as it is
might encounter
have claimed a copyright.
-Original Message-
From: maphist-boun...@geo.uu.nl [mailto:maphist-boun...@geo.uu.nl] On
Behalf Of David M. Lawrence
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 8:44 AM
To: Discussion group for map history
Subject: Re: [MapHist] Digital image copyright
This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
On 11/28/2010 9:19 AM, J. B. Post wrote:
but whether most websites containing maps which members of this list
might encounter
This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
JBP,
Until our map society web site went off line ~ 2 months ago (long story),
all of our map image web pages contained a notice
in advance for your
clarification.
Don McGuirk
- Original Message -
From: David M. Lawrenced...@fuzzo.com
To: Discussion group for map historymaphist@geo.uu.nl
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 6:44:17 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain
Subject: Re: [MapHist] Digital image copyright on websites
This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
In the early MapHist discussion that you mentioned (presumably the one
that took place in October of 2009) there was at least one
:
Sunday, November 28, 2010
8:44 AM
To:
Discussion group for map
history
Subject:
Re: [MapHist] Digital
image copyright on websites
There is no general
practice
