Re: [DISCUSS] Change by-laws on release votes: 5 days instead of 7

+1. Non-binding. Thanks, Junping On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks, I'd like to propose we change our by-laws to reduce our voting periods on new releases from 7 days to 5. Currently, it just takes too long to turn around releases;

Re: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

+1. Thanks, Junping On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com wrote: I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this topic. Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days. 1. Migrate from subversion to git for version control.

Re: Looking to a Hadoop 3 release

Thanks all for good discussions here. +1 on supporting Java 8 ASAP. In addition, I agree that we should separating this effort with cutting down Hadoop 3. IMO, Hadoop is still very cool today, and we should only consider Hadoop 3 until we have revolutionary feature (like YARN for 2.0) which

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

+1. (Non-binding) - Download and verify the checksum on src and binary locally. - Deploy a single node cluster and play with simple MR jobs, i.e. PI, Terasort, etc. All looks fine for now. Thanks, Junping From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org

Re: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0

+1 (non-binding). The plan sounds reasonable. We should make our release train more fast-moving, and predictable - it could benefit our community and ecosystem in many aspects. Thanks, Junping From: Arpit Agarwal aagar...@hortonworks.com Sent: Thursday,

Re: Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release

I would like to nominate YARN-3832 as 2.6.1 candidate which is critical and I also saw it happened recently on a 2.6.0 cluster. Hope this is not too late. Thanks, Junping From: Rich Haase rha...@pandora.com Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 1:52 AM To:

Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x

Thanks Chris Trezzo for volunteer on helping 2.6.3 release. I think Sangjin was asking for a committer to serve as release manager for 2.6.3 according to Apache rules: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html. I would like to serve as that role to work closely with you and Sangjin on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1

+1 (binding) with: - Download and verify signatures. - Build and deploy a single node cluster. - Run some example jobs (PI, etc.) on deployed cluster. Thanks, Junping From: Rohith Sharma K S Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015

Fw: ApacheCon NA 2015 Travel Assistance Applications now open!

FYI. Thanks, From: lewis john mcgibbney Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 4:15 AM Cc: travel-assista...@apache.org Subject: ApacheCon NA 2015 Travel Assistance Applications now open! Hi pmcs@, The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC)

Release plan for Apache Hadoop 2.6.3

forward open tickets [2].​ Thanks, Junping [1] 2.6.3 Fixed Tickets: http://s.apache.org/Ylq [2] 2.6.3 Tickets: http://s.apache.org/9A7 From: Junping Du Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 12:26 PM To: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Cc: Sangjin Lee; mapreduce-dev

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

Hi all developers in hadoop community, I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 (the next maintenance release to follow up 2.6.2.) according to email thread of release plan 2.6.3 [1]. Sorry for this RC coming a bit late as several blocker issues were getting committed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0 So, the original voting mail mentions we are voting on release-2.6.3-RC0 tag. Are we still doing that? What are the RC0.1 and RC1 tags doing then? +Vinod > On Dec 16, 2015, at 2:13 AM, Junping Du <j...@hortonwork

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

permission error. Could you check the permission to access the files? > Forbidden > You don't have permission to access > /~junping_du/hadoop-2.6.3-RC0/hadoop-2.6.3-RC0-src.tar.gz on this server. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com<

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

shows expected usages > > > > On 12/11/15, 4:16 PM, "Junping Du" <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi all developers in hadoop community, >> I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 (the next >> maintenance release t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

single node cluster setup and verified few MR jobs), >>>> submission of Unmanaged AM is getting the RM down. YARN-4452 has >>>> already been raised and i am working on it. Will provide the patch for >>>> the trunk and the 2.6.3 version asap >>>> >>>> Regards, >&

[DISCUSSION] Release Plan for Apache Hadoop 2.6.4

[1] Tickets fixed in 2.6.4: http://s.apache.org/vJB [2] Tickets targets for 2.6.4: http://s.apache.org/JpE From: Junping Du Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 1:36 PM To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache

Re: Highlighting communication on releases

Thanks Karthik to bring up the topic. Comparing with small enhancement on email distribution for release/branch news, I think a more important thing is to make our community (contributor & committer) to be more aware on ongoing releases/branches. I can see two improvements could be helpful

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

Checked 2.7.2-RC1 tag which match exactly with 2.7.2 branch. Downloaded the release bit and deploy a single node cluster which works fine with running some example jobs. Built from src and check signatures, all looks good. Checked release note which has 138 commits (HADOOP:22, HDFS:42,

Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x

org> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 6:55 PM To: Junping Du Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; Hadoop Common; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; Vinod Vavilapalli; Haohui Mai; Chris Trezzo Subject: Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x If the speed and clarity a

Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x

lready have in would > like to see their work out there. > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > +1. Early Dec sounds too early for 2.6.3 release given we only have 18 > > patches since recently release 2.6.2. > >

Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x

xu via jlowe) 7K Thanks, Junping From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 9:23 PM To: Junping Du Cc: Sangjin Lee; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; Hadoop Common; hdfs-...@hadoop.a

Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x

+1. Early Dec sounds too early for 2.6.3 release given we only have 18 patches since recently release 2.6.2. We should nominate more fixes and wait a while for the feedback on 2.6.2. Thanks, Junping From: Vinod Vavilapalli Sent:

Why there are so many revert operations on trunk?

Hi Andrew, I just noticed you revert 8 commits on trunk last Friday: HADOOP-13226 HDFS-10430 HDFS-10431 HDFS-10390 HADOOP-13168 HDFS-10390 HADOOP-13168 HDFS-10346 HADOOP-12957 HDFS-10224 And I didn't see you have any comments on JIRA or email discussion before you did this. I

Re: Why there are so many revert operations on trunk?

responsible, work hardly and carefully and open communication with all community. Only through this, the success of Hadoop in age of 3.0 are guranteed. Thanks, Junping From: Aaron T. Myers <a...@cloudera.com> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 4:46 PM To: Junping

Re: Why there are so many revert operations on trunk?

Andrew Wang Cc: Junping Du; Aaron T. Myers; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Why there are so many revert operations on trunk? Folks, It is truly disappointing how we are escalating situations th

Re: [DISCUSS] Increased use of feature branches

Comparing with advantages, I believe the disadvantages of shipping any releases directly from trunk are more obvious and significant: - A lot of commits (incompatible, risky, uncompleted feature, etc.) have to wait to commit to trunk or put into a separated branch that could delay feature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

unds good to me. > > > "any fix in 2.x.y to be there in all 2.b.c releases (while b>=x) that > get out after 2.x.y release date" > > +1 > > > I would prefer this rule only applies on critical/blocker fixes, but not > applies on minor/trivial issues. >

Re: [UPDATE] New ASF git policy on force-pushes / Tags / Stale branches

There are also several stale branches for YARN-2928 that we should consolidate: remotes/origin/YARN-2928 remotes/origin/YARN-2928-new remotes/origin/YARN-2928-old remotes/origin/YARN-2928-old-2015-11-09 remotes/origin/YARN-2928-rebase remotes/origin/feature-YARN-2928 (the latest one)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC2

In addition, all new fixes backport from 2.6.3 doesn't listed in 2.7.2 entry of CHANGES.txt but keep listed as 2.6.3. I think this is fine no matter we have multiple entries to track the same commit or a single entry to track the earliest commit. The only thing matter is the commits in release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

shape now.​ Thanks, Junping​ From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 11:15 PM To: Junping Du Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 RC0

hen we create new RCs. Thanks Akira for +1 on this proposed additional release step. Once we have an agreement on the details, we will update the wiki page accordingly. Best, --Yongjun On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Hi community folks, &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 RC0

itical (and will be addressed in all future releases), and the concern Allen raised. Best, --Yongjun On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Allen Wittenauer <a...@altiscale.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 9, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > > Thank

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 RC0

this also can be ported to 2.6 > branch so it will help to specify labels at submission time. > > Thanks and Regards > Sunil > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:31 PM Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > >> Hi community folks, >>I've created a release candida

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 RC0

Hi community folks, I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 (the next maintenance release to follow up 2.6.3.) according to email thread of release plan 2.6.4 [1]. Below is details of this release candidate: The RC is available for validation at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC2

I give my binding +1 on 2.7.2-RC2 with following check: - All new commits (155) since 2.7.1 are included in commit log and CHANGES.txt which equally to JIRA marked as fixed in 2.7.2. - Signatures and message digests all are looks good, build get successfully from the source tar ball with JDK

Re: Looking to a Hadoop 3 release

Shall we consolidate effort for 2.8.0 and 3.0.0? It doesn't sounds reasonable to have two alpha releases to go in parallel. Is EC feature the main motivation of releasing hadoop 3 here? If so, I don't understand why this feature cannot land on 2.8.x or 2.9.x as an alpha feature. If we release

Re: 2.7.3 release plan

Thanks for bringing up this topic, Sean. When I released our latest Hadoop release 2.6.4, the patch of HDFS-8791 haven't been committed in so that's why we didn't discuss this earlier. I remember in JIRA discussion, we treated this layout change as a Blocker bug that fixing a significant

Re: [DISCUSS] Set minimum version of Hadoop 3 to JDK8 (HADOOP-11858)

bq. We'll need to be strict after the switch: all patches to go into branch 2 will have to go through yetus as branch-2 patches, then cherry picked to trunk, or a separate patch on the same JIRA done for the branch-2. Assuming yetus still tests the branch-2 stuff on JDK7, that will check

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

Thanks Chris for bring up this discussion. Before we going to detail discussion of releasing 2.6.5, I have a quick question here: do we think it is necessary to continue to release branch-2.6, like 2.6.5, etc after 2.7 is out for more than 1 year. Any reason to not suggest users to upgrade to

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

ris Trezzo <ctre...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 9:30 PM To: Junping Du Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; Jason Lowe Subject: Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities Thanks J

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

; > Thanks > Karthik > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Allen Wittenauer < > a...@effectivemachines.com > > wrote: > > > > > > On Aug 11, 2016, at 8:10 AM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > > > > Allen, to be clear, I am not aga

Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

have more comments or suggestions. Thanks, Junping From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 1:41 AM To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release cadence and EOL

+1 on Sangjin's proposal - "A minor release line is end-of-lifed 2 years after it is released or there are 2 newer minor releases, whichever is sooner. The community reserves the right to extend or shorten the life of a release line if there is a good reason to do so." I also noticed Karthik

Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

to branch-2.8.0 at this moment. Thanks! Cheers, Junping From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:26 PM To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org

Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

he problem? Thanks, Junping ____ From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 6:46 PM To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Varun Vas

Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

:48 AM To: Junping Du Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities You can check the error message by clicking on it, a bunch like this: Missing Sig

Re: [REMINDER] How to set fix versions when committing

Hi Andrew and all, Thanks for the notice on the change. I still concern this rule change may cause some confusion from conflicting against our previous rule - no need to set trunk version if it is landing on 2.x branch. As we can see, there are 4 cases of version setting for JIRA landing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.5 (RC1)

+1 binding, based on: - Download and build from source, check signatures - Deploy a single node cluster and run some simple jobs, like sleep, PI, etc. Thanks Sangjin and Chris for working on 2.6.5 release! Thanks, Junping From: larry mccay

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.3 RC1

I think Allen's previous comments are very misleading. In my understanding, only incompatible API (RPC, CLIs, WebService, etc.) shouldn't land on branch-2, but other incompatible behaviors (logs, audit-log, daemon's restart, etc.) should get flexible for landing. Otherwise, how could 52 issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.3 RC2

Thanks Vinod for creating new RC for 2.7.3 release. +1 (binding) based on following verifications: - Download src and binary tar ball and verify signature (gpg --verify). - Build from source Java 1.8.0_31-b13 on Mac native successfully. - Build from source with Java 1.7.0_79-b15 on Ubuntu VM

Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

he.org/view/H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-trunk-JACC/24/artifact/target/compat-check/report.html Regards, Akira On 2016/12/02 2:08, Junping Du wrote: > Thanks Andrew! That's also a nice suggestion. I already create a similar job: > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-2.8-J

[Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

Hi folks, Per asked by Vinod offline, I would like to continue the effort to push 2.8 release out in next several weeks. The plan is as following: - We only have 5 blockers and 3 critical issues (https://s.apache.org/6kwx) so far, and most of them are in good progress now. I put them

Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

. Non-critical fixes can wait for next one. Any other comments and suggestions? Thanks, Junping From: sjl...@gmail.com <sjl...@gmail.com> on behalf of Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:24 PM To: Junping D

Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

, Junping From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 11:31 AM To: Akira Ajisaka; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [Con

YARN Jenkins Build get consistent failed.

Hi hadoop folks, I noticed that our recent YARN jenkins tests are consistently failed (https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build) due to test environment issues below. I already filed blocker issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13141 to our INFRA team yesterday

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3)

are missing from mirror sites which get reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13755. The Apache infrastructure team is investigating right now. Will send release news when issue get fixed. Stay tuned! Thanks, Junping From: Junping Du &l

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3)

some example MR jobs, like: PI, sleep, etc. Now, we have: 7 binding +1s, from: Wangda Tan, Jason Lowe, Akira Ajisaka, Ravi Prakash, Karthik Kambatla, Jian He, Junping Du 18 non-binding +1s, from: Miklos Szegedi, Eric Payne, Daniel Templeton, Mingliang Liu, Sunil Govind, Marton

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC2)

, March 16, 2017 7:27 AM To: Junping Du Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC2) > On 16 Mar 2017, at 00:25, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC2)

when HDFS-11431 get fixed. Thanks, Junping From: Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 2:04 PM To: Junping Du Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3)

From: John Zhuge <jzh...@cloudera.com> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 9:07 AM To: Junping Du Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3)

jzh...@cloudera.com> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 10:31 AM To: Junping Du Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3) Yes, it only affects ADL. There is a work

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3)

Hi all, With fix of HDFS-11431 get in, I've created a new release candidate (RC3) for Apache Hadoop 2.8.0. This is the next minor release to follow up 2.7.0 which has been released for more than 1 year. It comprises 2,900+ fixes, improvements, and new features. Most of these commits

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3)

if founded - I will check if another round of RC is needed based on your findings. Thanks! Thanks, Junping From: Kuhu Shukla <kshu...@yahoo-inc.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 3:17 PM Cc: Junping Du; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC2)

_ From: Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 2:50 PM To: Junping Du Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC2) Hi Junping, Noti

Re: Upgrading minimum version of Maven to 3.1 from 3.0

Thanks Sunil to bring it up. However, any reason not to go to latest version of maven (3.3+)? Even version 3.1 is quite old - released 3+ years from now (please refer: https://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/). btw, I assume we only plan to change maven version on trunk given new YARN UI

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.1 Release Plan

I just cut off branch-2.8.1 from branch-2.8 for 2.8.1 release. So from now, all patch target for 2.8.1 need to be checked into branch-2.8.1 in addition to branch-2.8. Thanks, Junping From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> Sent: Monday, April 03,

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC2)

Hi all, With several important fixes get merged last week, I've created a new release candidate (RC2) for Apache Hadoop 2.8.0. This is the next minor release to follow up 2.7.0 which has been released for more than 1 year. It comprises 2,919 fixes, improvements, and new features.

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Plan

From: Jason Lowe <jl...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:17 AM To: Kihwal Lee; Junping Du; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Pl

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Plan

Make sense, just raise: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14669 Thanks, Junping From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 12:31 PM To: Junping Du Cc: Kihwal Lee; common-...@hadoop.apache.org

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Plan

. I will also adjust fix version on all affected JIRA accordingly. If you have any concerns on above operations, please raise it before the end of this Sunday (7/23). Thanks, Junping From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> Sent: Friday, July 21,

Re:

bug fixes/improvements, please commit to branch-2.8 (trunk/branch-2) only and mark JIRA fixed as 2.8.3. Thanks for your cooperation! Thanks, Junping From: Junping Du Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 10:36 AM To: Brahma Reddy Battula; Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Cc

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Plan

<brahmareddy.batt...@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:50 AM To: Junping Du; Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Cc: Kihwal Lee; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; Jason Lowe; humbed...@apache.org Subject: Re:

Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Plan

Hi all, Per Vinod's previous email, we just announce Apache Hadoop 2.8.1 get released today which is a special security release. Now, we should work towards 2.8.2 release which aim for production deployment. The focus obviously is to fix blocker/critical issues [2], bug-fixes and *no*

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Plan

: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:41 PM To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: I have done the change. All committers, 2.8.2 release is supposed to be a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 (RC0)

work out a patch soon, I am open to accept it. Thanks, Junping From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:32 PM To: Daniel Templeton; Chris Douglas Cc: Miklos Szegedi; Mingliang Liu; Hadoop Common; Hdfs-dev; mapredu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 (RC0)

From: Daniel Templeton <dan...@cloudera.com> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 4:45 PM To: Chris Douglas; Junping Du Cc: Miklos Szegedi; Mingliang Liu; Hadoop Common; Hdfs-dev; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; junping_du Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop

[Update] Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Status

is still open for blocker/critical issues landing, but for major/minor/trivial issues, please commit to branch-2.8 and marked the fixed version as 2.8.3. Thanks all for heads up. Have a good weekend! Thanks, Junping From: Junping Du &l

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Plan

off RC0 around holiday (this weekend). Thanks, ​Junping From: Brahma Reddy Battula <brahmareddy.batt...@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8:42 AM To: Junping Du; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapredu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 (RC0)

ce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; junping_du; Junping Du Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 (RC0) Hello Junping, Thank you for working on this. Should not YARN-6622 be addressed first? "Summary: Document Docker work as experimental". Thank you, Miklos On Sun, S

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Plan

, Junping From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 12:37 PM To: larry mccay; Steve Loughran Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subje

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 (RC0)

Hi folks, With fix of HADOOP-14842 get in, I've created our first release candidate (RC0) for Apache Hadoop 2.8.2. Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 is the first stable release of Hadoop 2.8 line and will be the latest stable/production release for Apache Hadoop - it includes 305 new fixed issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 (RC0)

From: Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 12:00 PM To: Junping Du Cc: Miklos Szegedi; Mingliang Liu; Hadoop Common; Hdfs-dev; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; junping_du Subject: Re: [VOTE] R

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Plan

Should we fix this? If so, Hadoop 2.8.2 is the time to do it > > > > On 1 Sep 2017, at 11:14, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > > HADOOP-14814 get committed and HADOOP-9747 get push out to 2.8.3, so we > are clean on blocker/critical issues now. >

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Plan

before doing any commits. branch-2.8 is still open for landing. Thanks for your cooperation! Thanks, Junping From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 12:35 AM To: Brahma Reddy Battula; common-...@hadoop.apache.org;

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 (RC1)

;jl...@oath.com> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 2:49 PM To: Junping Du Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 (RC1) My apologies, false alarm on the CHANGES.md and RELEASENO

Re: [Update] Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 Release Status

for vote once the build process get finished. In the mean time, please hold on any commits to branch-2.8.2 unless it really belongs to a blocker and please ping me ahead. Thanks all for your patience! Thanks, Junping From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.

Re: [DISCUSS] A final minor release off branch-2?

Thanks Vinod to bring up this discussion, which is just in time. I agree with most responses that option C is not a good choice as our community bandwidth is precious and we should focus on very limited mainstream branches to develop, test and deployment. Of course, we should still follow

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

uesday, November 21, 2017 7:45 PM To: Junping Du; Konstantin Shvachko Cc: Wangda Tan; Andrew Wang; Zheng, Kai; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan Agree with Kons

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 (RC0)

Hi all, I've created the first release candidate (RC0) for Apache Hadoop 2.8.3. This is our next maint release to follow up 2.8.2. It includes 79 important fixes and improvements. The RC artifacts are available at: http://home.apache.org/~junping_du/hadoop-2.8.3-RC0 The RC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC1

Thanks Andrew for pushing new RC for 3.0.0. I was out last week, just get chance to validate new RC now. Basically, I found two critical issues with the same rolling upgrade scenario as where HADOOP-15059 get found previously: HDFS-12920, we changed value format for some hdfs configurations

Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

Hi, We have several important fixes get landed on branch-2.8 and I would like to cut off branch-2.8.3 now to start 2.8.3 release work. So far, I don't see any pending blockers on 2.8.3, so my current plan is to cut off 1st RC of 2.8.3 in next several days: - For all coming

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

ber 20, 2017 10:22 PM To: Zheng, Kai Cc: Junping Du; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan I'm against including new features in maintenance releases, since they're meant to

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

/critical fixes landing on branch-2.8.3. RC0 will get cut-off shortly. Thanks, Junping From: Wangda Tan <wheele...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:52 AM To: Andrew Wang Cc: Junping Du; Zheng, Kai; common-...@hadoop.apache.org;

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

Another issue I just found is we have token format compatibility issue between 2.x and 3.0. I tried to run a simple MR job on 3.0 RC0 against with 2.9.0 tarball which is failed. This incompatibility change should also break other applications which will break rolling upgrade. I think it is

Re:

Just filed HADOOP-15059 to track this. Thanks, Junping From: Junping Du Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 1:09 PM To: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli; Allen Wittenauer Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs

Re: [DISCUSS] A final minor release off branch-2?

be recognized as "rolling". Do I miss anything? Thanks, Junping From: Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:34 AM To: Junping Du Cc: Wangda Tan; Steve Loughran; Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli; Kai Zheng; Arun

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.9.0 (RC3)

I did following verification work: - build succeed from source - verify signature - deploy a pseudo cluster and run some simple MR jobs - Check HDFS/YARN daemons' UI - Verify commit history matching with JIRA's fix version (which will be included in site document). Most works fine, except I

Re: Cutting branch-2.9

Below is some findings from my recently run of JACC (https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-2.9-JACC/12/artifact/target/compat-check/report.html) job against 2.9 and 2.8.2. I have discussed with Arun and Subru offline on jdiff report who convinced me some of items are not a big concern. Just

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 (RC0)

be it is necessary to extend the voting period for a few more days. But please try as much as possible to verify our release bits. Thanks! Thanks, Junping? From: Eric Payne <eric.payne1...@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 1:51 PM To: Junping Du;

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 (RC0)

md5 checksum for given source tar ball? Thanks, Junping From: Konstantin Shvachko <shv.had...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, December 9, 2017 11:06 AM To: Junping Du Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org

  1   2   >