--- Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 09:34 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
What on earth is community.gnome.org?
As for today it is a launcher from the general nav
bar to the GNOME is
People subsites:
* Planet GNOME
* GUADEC and other event subsites
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 00:31 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/ProjectsPages updated.
Hm, not updated. I fear it never went beyond the Preview. Sht. Anyway,
at least the email with the elements of discussion went through.
--
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 09:34 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
What on earth is community.gnome.org?
As for today it is a launcher from the general nav bar to the GNOME is
People subsites:
* Planet GNOME
* GUADEC and other event subsites if appropriate i.e. Foro Brazil
* The GNOME
quote who=Quim Gil
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 09:34 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
What on earth is community.gnome.org?
As for today it is a launcher from the general nav bar to the GNOME is
People subsites:
Well, you need a way to connect Planet, Foundation and GUADEC from the
General Nav
--- Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Quim Gil
* projects.gnome.org -
GnomeWeb/ProjectsPages . I want to update
this page and see if we find a 2.18
solution that satisfies
Jeff.
* support.gnome.org . Hopefully Luke will
want to take on this.
quote who=Joachim Noreiko
How is projects.gnome.org back on the agenda at all?
Well, we could just delete all the current projects pages ;) Some of them
are unmaintained and some duplicate things we want to say elsewhere. But
the various app teams might object.
This has already been
quote who=Joachim Noreiko
This has already been discussed.
IIRC, the outcome was the marketing wants snazzy pages that present parts
of gnome, not necesarily single modules or apps, and module and app teams
will throw a hissy fit if they lose their little corner of webspace. So we
end up
--- Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Joachim Noreiko
Those ideas never needed to be in opposition, but
were pushed that way. They
are not mutually exclusive.
Fair enough.
But then what's your objection? Using the projects.g.o
subdomain?
That doesn't have to imply Yet
quote who=Joachim Noreiko
Those ideas never needed to be in opposition, but were pushed that way.
They are not mutually exclusive.
Fair enough. But then what's your objection? Using the projects.g.o
subdomain?
Yes. It's unnecessary.
What's wrong with www.gnomesupport.org? There's no
2006/10/23, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Surely a completely different domain is even worse than a subdomain?
The content already exists there, working URLs, etc. Why move it?
I think a very strong argument pro keeping a website not beeing a
subsite of .gnome.org is that people already have
--- Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Joachim Noreiko
Those ideas never needed to be in opposition,
but were pushed that way.
They are not mutually exclusive.
Fair enough. But then what's your objection?
Using the projects.g.o
subdomain?
Yes. It's unnecessary.
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 09:34 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
I have to send the fighting subdomain disease email in response to this.
We have several diseases to fight. One is the mess of subdomains and
domains. Another one is the lack of consistency and general structure
across subsites. We try to
HI, Joachim!
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:44:38 +0100 (BST)
Joachim Noreiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
On the other hand, I think wgo/projects should be moved out.
[snip]
It might be worth to consider dropping the projects.g.o idea, IMHO.
I had two goals in mind when I proposed
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/ProjectsPages updated.
Let's decide what we do with this.
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 09:34 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
How is projects.gnome.org back on the agenda at all?
During 2.16 we agreed that we would drop the goal and leave the
discussion for later. Now we are
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 12:28:27PM +0200, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
I also want to suggest to eliminate most mailing lists that GNOME is
using now. I think most have very low traffic and its much more work
to read ALL mails of some small projects to know the status of a
project than to just open a
2006/10/23, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have to send the fighting subdomain disease email in response to this.
What is all this stuff? Why does it need a subdomain?
I had similar feelings. I think a subdomain can be ok, but too much of
this can be confusing.
Thilo
Blog:
16 matches
Mail list logo
