On 11/24/2010 10:57 PM, Christoph Noack wrote:
The web site is not intended to please the people who belong to the
community, but to attract new people (new community members, and new
software users) and to communicate with stakeholders (individuals and
companies/organizations interested in
Hi Italo,
I feel a need to second your statements ;-)
Am Sonntag, den 21.11.2010, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Italo Vignoli:
We cannot decide where people will navigate, and which information
they will access from which web site. Of course, we will cross
reference the two web sites, but I think that
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:29 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
Personally I think that this type of organisation is a bit too late
unless everyone is on board and most of OOo members are used to working
under the common understanding of Marketing and Design understanding.
You mentioned philosophical
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:29 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
Personally I think that this type of organisation is a bit too late
unless everyone is on board and most of OOo members are used to working
under the common understanding of Marketing and Design understanding.
You mentioned philosophical
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 01:28 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I think they cover quite clearly what they want to say, so I'd keep them.
If they would, there would be no question whether design should sit
below marketing or not. There would be no questions if the logo or a
brochure belongs to
On 11/20/2010 10:56 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
This is what the Silverstripe and Drupal sites are all about. A one stop
shop place where everything is available under one roof but also where
all is built according to permissions to users as to what levels of the
website they may work on or see.
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 03:50 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
We have been gently reminded that marketing ideas should reside on the
Marekting/ideas wiki pages. For the sake of consistency, could you add
your idea to the http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Ideas
page?
Sure, but shouldn't
On 11/20/2010 11:49 PM, drew wrote:
Your speaking as if there is only one view of the web site, there is not
when under the control of a CMS system. There is a view that is
published, official in other words
Please remember that I behave like a user (and sometimes like a
journalist) and not
OK,
Sorry this has taken a little while, but I have been busy with paid
work over the last week more than normal.
I have created a workflow summary from the information gathered from
this thread.
In addition to this we can build a 'exhibition system' which would
allow people outside of the design
Hi Marc, all,
it's hard to follow general decisions down in threads on Drupal.
Marc Paré schrieb:
[...] Now that we essentially have 2 groups: [Marketing] and
[Design], do we want an ideas section in both? Or would we rather have
on ideas section where we can see the whole range of ideas?
Hi Michael, *
Michael Wheatland schrieb:
[...]
I have created a workflow summary from the information gathered from
this thread.
In addition to this we can build a 'exhibition system' which would
allow people outside of the design team to see examples of projects
that the design team have
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 20:49 +0930, Michael Wheatland wrote:
In addition to this we can build a 'exhibition system' which would
allow people outside of the design team to see examples of projects
that the design team have completed, but that is the next step, we
need to build the groundwork
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 06:13 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
I propose that we keep the ideas section, but that we have two
internal sections: one section for design related ideas and another
with marketing-related ideas. This will keep it simple and both teams
will be aware of what project have
Hi all,
Sorry if this might feel like an empty answer - but since I am travelling at
the moment, I would like to avoid lengthly mails written on tiny keyboards.
So just a: I do have some thoughts how some topic structuring might work. Both
for the Design team stuff and the tooling like the
Michael Wheatland wrote:
It can be hard at times to trust another group with something you are
dependant on, but I assure you that the system will be very functional
and easy to use for non-technical people.
This is not a problem for me. I am used trust others as I do not have a
technical
Hi Marc, Thorsten, *
Marc Paré schrieb:
Le 2010-11-21 11:23, Thorsten Wilms a écrit :
[...]
Design vs Marketing, yes.
If you apply some of the broader definitions, you can both conclude that
Design touches everything and also that Marketing touches everything.
Originally marketing may have
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 20:30 +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote:
* Workflows / Procedures: work in progress
Again, work in progress should be on the wiki.
The web site cannot contain work in progress, as it should be the
basic
source of information about TDF and LibreOffice, and people are
On 11/20/2010 09:04 PM, drew wrote:
So of course the wiki is a tool that is going be used, but the process
of design, as is ongoing here, and then implementation via a CMS, such
as Drupal or Silverstripe for that matter, is precisely a mechanism for
delivery of a system that performs in the way
On 11/20/2010 08:46 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Have you ever had an artwork contributor send a photoshop file for the
team to look at? If so, the Drupal site Team Devs will test the site to
make sure that there are no hiccups if this is ever done. The list is
not to support any of the files formats
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 22:20 +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote:
I do not mind what happens before the publication on the web site
Right - and that is the key descriptor, publication.
Your speaking as if there is only one view of the web site, there is not
when under the control of a CMS system. There
I found it very hard to follow this conversation. Can we take a step back.
The marketing list should not be the place for discussing website
infrastructure.
Quote of Initial email
Needed: Please feel free to add any individual team requirements for the
final Drupal based website. All
21 matches
Mail list logo
