==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
For goodness' sake. What's so bloody hard about this? Capitalist
employers are
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 17/10/2010 18:09, Barry Brooks wrote:
Why is an economy benefited by exporting
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
It's inevitable that little is said about the smaller unions. The
difference is
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 30/09/2010 16:11, waistli...@aol.com wrote:
Unions are equality organizations,
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
This article on the New Yorker points out some of the misgivings I have
about
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 23/09/2010 20:19, Nestor Gorojovsky wrote:
Dear David (BTW, do you have any
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
From: Mark Lause markala...@gmail.com
Have we nothing more concrete in front of
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
This discussion is absolutely ridiculous.
Let's concede all the claims, for the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
At the risk of overextending historical analogies and talking about a
country I
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
From: sobuadha...@hushmail.com
Was the CP any closer to seizing power before the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
From: S. Artesian sartes...@earthlink.net
At the same time, what is remarkable on
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
From: Joaquin Bustelo jbust...@bellsouth.net
Certainly not true of the CPUSA --
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
As a curious point, if, perhaps, it may sound trollish, I think it's
interesting
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
So if I'm reading this right, US enterprises have been able to push wages
down or
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I don't have a lot of info on this, but I would say the exceptional factor
in the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Incidentally a similar contoversy is taking place in Spain. A court has
decided
I am almost certain I have read something like this, I'm now trying to find
the source. What I remember went something like this:
That the revolution must create its own enemy, and its enemy, by its
reaction, increases somehow the readiness or the capability of the
revolutionaries to carry the
This is the quote I was thinking of, which does not exactly say the same
thing, but is I believe close enough. It's from the preface to the Class
Struggles in France:
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1850/class-struggles-france/index.htm
In a word: The revolution made progress,
What makes it clear for me that animal liberation is un-marxist is how the
approaches these people take to the question are completely moralistic and
not based on materialism. So for instance I'm sympathetic to arguments about
how conditions of life for farm animals lead to actual dangers for
From: Ryan Neighbors rnei...@uark.edu
I'm new to the study of Marxist theory, so I was hoping some of you
could help me. I need to know (for a paper) a few Marxist theorists
who deal extensively with the ideas of war, pacifism, and/or
revolution. I'm primarily interested in the idea of
From: Michael Smith m...@smithbowen.net
Really? Perl and LISP seem pretty different to me. Fully determined is a
mighty strong claim. Constrained, perhaps. A programming language that
you can't implement in silicon would be pretty useless as long as we have
to depend on silicon, but then --
From: Les Schaffer schaf...@optonline.net
even a hard-bitten reductionist like moi finds this last sentence
incomprehensible. now if you substituted molecular biology and
biochemistry for physics you might be able to salvage the thought, but
biologists don't talk about laws of matter in
In spite of having read a good deal of Rosa's essay and links, I'm not sure
I understand the relevant to the particular questions of materialism and the
will. My fault, not hers, I lack the time to go over it in detail.
--David.
YOU MUST clip
From: Daniel Koechlin d.koech...@wanadoo.fr
The Americans are decidedly anti-dialectic.
And that statement isn't?
A European here, and I'm not convinced the distinction is quite as you put
it. Though maybe a useful way to think about it is the distinction between
procedural and distributive
This is a collection of Soviet songs. Not much more to say than that, except
I found the introduction to the site an interesting read.
URL: http://www.sovmusic.ru/english/
--David.
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Any suggestions here for free web space friendly to iconoclastic politics?
You could do worse than http://otaku.freeshell.org/index.cgi?join
The ARPA membership level requires a one-time donation but it really is
worth it imo.
--David.
YOU
26 matches
Mail list logo