==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
LeftStreamed - Recorded in Toronto, May 16, 2010:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Financial Times
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7ac169d8-4b3c-11df-a7ff-00144feab49a.html
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Yeah that's the article. Sorry I am just reading my mail again now after a
long day
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Mark wrote:
Actually, in saying this, brad is himself climbing on board with the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Greg- I can not begin to unravel what that guy was posting on FB. The
only thing I
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Mark wrote:
Gee, brad, didn't you already know the material basis of their anger.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Mark writes:
Again, people are arbitrarily smudging people who say in the polls,
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Here is another tea party poll:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The US manufacturing sector expanded in March at its fastest rate for six
years, a
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis wrote:
The inability of the ruling class in the USA to act on its *long
term*
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/us/politics/28recess.html?ref=todayspaper
Actual
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Yes, this is also where I think we part ways because I think every crisis is
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Gary, I fail to see your point. Are you saying that if Obama looses to a
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Wasn't it 2007 that Sam and Leo were saying there was no crisis?
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
But all this talk of criminal behaviour is only the means to glaze over the
real
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
~~ T h e B u l l e t ~~
A Socialist Project
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The HM Toronto website is up at http://www.yorku.ca/hmyork/index.html even
though
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Someone needs to explain to me how if we don't reach out to workers who are
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I disagree. The teabaggers are not even a movement but a scattering of
people who
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Here is the entire issue:
http://rapidshare.com/files/347251655/NLR_JanFeb2010.zip
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Is it too soon to say that as was the case in the 1930s the big
capitalist powers
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Just so you know, those links to TV shows don't work outside the US.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
really what do you see when you click on the link?
Les
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The most interesting part of this poll report is the potential split in the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
With Europe reeling
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Global warming makes trees grow at fastest rate for 200 years
By Steve Connor,
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
It only amounts to attempts to justify the skewed austerity policies being
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
A) I would be careful not to take the exceptional period of the 'post-war
boom' as
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Mathew Russo wrote:
1) The Democrats, like the Republicans are not simply
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
You know that you are in good company when Thomas Friedman is on your
side.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
WaistLine Wrote:
The Matrix movie generated much discussion as a fun movie, but
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Greg wrote:
This is a tangential point, but speaking of the direct hand of the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
True enough. However, I am not so sure that employing outside labour puts
them at
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/governments/014496.html
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I got this from Wikipedia. (if this is not formatted correctly can you
email me
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Again from Wiki on Australian Labour history-
The trade union response to
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Go to the CIW website, http://ciw-online.org
http://ciw-online.org/ for the full
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Well, do we expect the bourgeois ideologists, professional flacks,
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Now if by capital-ISM there is meant a reference to ideology, then
especially
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
What would make it a crisis of capitalism? Was the Great Depression a
crisis
Part two of Leo Panitch interview on the dollar.
http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=31Itemid=74jumival=4342
In it he confirms my statement that a decline in the dollar will bring about
at least somewhat of a decrease in unemployment but he agrees with
S.Artesian that
This is related to and answers some of the issues I posed. Panitch on the
current state of the dollar.
http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=31Itemid=74jumival=4340
Brad
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to
This article has a lot of flaws but at least it does not fall for the
inter-imperialist rivalry within the G-20 and over the US dollar nonsense.
It properly shows the shared interest (even if it seems to imply a level of
coordination and conspiracy) of capitalists across nations. If only the
left
This article highlights the Obama admin's new undocumented immigrant
enforcement plan, which is going to focus on putting pressure on employers
to fire all employees that it cannot prove are documented US Citizens or
have valid visa's. What I found interesting is that it occurred at American
I don't think it really is as simple as either Luko or Einde (sp?) make it
out to be. Some places where Die Linke have entered coalitions with the SPD
do show both the limits to electoral politics and the necessity to meet the
people were they are at to squeeze out even the slightest of gains for
http://www.thestar.com/default
Marx and his ideas rise from the dustbin of history TheStar.com - Opinion -
Marx and his ideas rise from the dustbin of history
Profound understanding of capitalist dynamics has come to the fore during
the current crisis
September 07, 2009
*Leo Panitch
*Research
To activists in the US it should be painfully obvious to them that there is
no hope for coalition building. It is either the Democrats or something
outside of power. I don't understand all the talk about die Linke etc. It is
kind of a waste of time. There will never be a coalition govenment
I am sorry but that is not a good critique of Benn Michaels. Like yours
Louis it too is filled with strawperson arguments based on things that he
never said. I am not going to get into specifics of his arguments, which I
personally think he does not present very well, because it is clear that
I think the boost
in the US, looking at the new orders in transportation, is probably a
one-off event based on the 'cash for clunkers' deals.
S.Artesian can you please elaborate on this. Why do you still feel that
there is no recovery? How do you incorporate the increased productivity and
From the BEA http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/2009/gdp109f.htm
Corporate Profits
Profits from current production (corporate profits with inventory valuation
and capital
consumption adjustments) increased $48.1 billion in the first quarter, in
contrast to a decrease of $250.3
Hold on a minute. If we are all going to agree that cheap food is a good
thing for the working class I would, from a marxist position, first question
what cheap food actually means: Are we talking about exchange value as being
cheap and what about the relationship of cheap food to value? To talk
Nada wrote- in cereal production, it makes almost no difference whatsoever
if wheat, barely or other grains are produced in very large tracts or
smaller more intensely farmed ones.
What is your source for this position? What exactly are you talking about
as making no difference, no difference
53 matches
Mail list logo